Literature DB >> 32497058

Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants.

Anna De Benedictis1,2, Emanuele Lettieri3, Luca Gastaldi3, Cristina Masella3, Alessia Urgu1, Daniela Tartaglini1,2.   

Abstract

The implementation of hospital-wide Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) is still an unsolved quest for many hospital managers. EMRs have long been considered a key factor for improving healthcare quality and safety, reducing adverse events for patients, decreasing costs, optimizing processes, improving clinical research and obtaining best clinical performances. However, hospitals continue to experience resistance from professionals to accepting EMRs. This study combines institutional and individual factors to explain which determinants can trigger or inhibit the EMRs implementation in hospitals, and which variables managers can exploit to guide professionals' behaviours. Data have been collected through a survey administered to physicians and nurses in an Italian University Hospital in Rome. A total of 114 high-quality responses had been received. Results show that both, physicians and nurses, expect many benefits from the use of EMRs. In particular, it is believed that the EMRs will have a positive impact on quality, efficiency and effectiveness of care; handover communication between healthcare workers; teaching, tutoring and research activities; greater control of your own business. Moreover, data show an interplay between individual and institutional determinants: normative factors directly affect perceived usefulness (C = 0.30 **), perceived ease of use (C = 0.26 **) and intention to use EMRs (C = 0.33 **), regulative factors affect the intention to use EMRs (C = -0.21 **), and perceived usefulness directly affect the intention to use EMRs (C = 0.33 **). The analysis carried out shows that the key determinants of the intention to use EMRs are the normative ones (peer influence) and the individual ones (perceived usefulness), and that perceived usefulness works also as a mediator between normative factors and intention to use EMRs. Therefore, Management can leverage on power users to motivate, generate and manage change.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32497058     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Improving the Quality of Electronic Medical Record Documentation: Development of a Compliance and Quality Program.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jedwab; Michael Franco; Denise Owen; Anna Ingram; Bernice Redley; Naomi Dobroff
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Stagewise Overview of Issues Influencing Organizational Technology Adoption and Use.

Authors:  Mina Saghafian; Karin Laumann; Martin Rasmussen Skogstad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Healthcare providers' readiness for electronic health record adoption: a cross-sectional study during pre-implementation phase.

Authors:  Habtamu Setegn Ngusie; Sisay Yitayih Kassie; Alex Ayenew Chereka; Ermias Bekele Enyew
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Nurses' Experiences After Implementation of an Organization-Wide Electronic Medical Record: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jedwab; Elizabeth Manias; Alison M Hutchinson; Naomi Dobroff; Bernice Redley
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2022-07-26

5.  Understanding How to Improve the Use of Clinical Coordination Mechanisms between Primary and Secondary Care Doctors: Clues from Catalonia.

Authors:  Laura Esteve-Matalí; Ingrid Vargas; Franco Amigo; Pere Plaja; Francesc Cots; Erick F Mayer; Joan-Manuel Pérez-Castejón; María-Luisa Vázquez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluation of a Paper-Based Checklist versus an Electronic Handover Tool Based on the Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) Concept in Patients after Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Carolin Rehm; Richard Zoller; Alina Schenk; Nicole Müller; Nadine Strassberger-Nerschbach; Sven Zenker; Ehrenfried Schindler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.