Literature DB >> 32496805

Use of Multiple Ion Fragmentation Methods to Identify Protein Cross-Links and Facilitate Comparison of Data Interpretation Algorithms.

Bingqing Zhao1, Colin P Reilly1, Caroline Davis2, Andreas Matouschek2, James P Reilly1.   

Abstract

Multiple ion fragmentation methods involving collision-induced dissociation (CID), higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with regular and very high energy settings, and electron-transfer dissociation with supplementary HCD (EThcD) are implemented to improve the confidence of cross-link identifications. Three different S. cerevisiae proteasome samples cross-linked by diethyl suberthioimidate (DEST) or bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3) are analyzed. Two approaches are introduced to combine interpretations from the above four methods. Working with cleavable cross-linkers such as DEST, the first approach searches for cross-link diagnostic ions and consistency among the best interpretations derived from all four MS2 spectra associated with each precursor ion. Better agreement leads to a more definitive identification. Compatible with both cleavable and noncleavable cross-linkers such as BS3, the second approach multiplies scoring metrics from a number of fragmentation experiments to derive an overall best match. This significantly increases the scoring gap between the target and decoy matches. The validity of cross-links fragmented by HCD alone and identified by Kojak, MeroX, pLink, and Xi was evaluated using multiple fragmentation data. Possible ways to improve the identification credibility are discussed. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD018310.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-linked peptides; cross-linking mass spectrometry; ion fragmentation methods; proteasome; proteome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32496805      PMCID: PMC7369150          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  65 in total

Review 1.  Lessons in de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Katalin F Medzihradszky; Robert J Chalkley
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Toward full peptide sequence coverage by dual fragmentation combining electron-transfer and higher-energy collision dissociation tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christian K Frese; A F Maarten Altelaar; Henk van den Toorn; Dirk Nolting; Jens Griep-Raming; Albert J R Heck; Shabaz Mohammed
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A new in vivo cross-linking mass spectrometry platform to define protein-protein interactions in living cells.

Authors:  Robyn M Kaake; Xiaorong Wang; Anthony Burke; Clinton Yu; Wynne Kandur; Yingying Yang; Eric J Novtisky; Tonya Second; Jicheng Duan; Athit Kao; Shenheng Guan; Danielle Vellucci; Scott D Rychnovsky; Lan Huang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Differential Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Cross-Linker: A New Approach for High Confidence in Identifying Protein Cross-Linking.

Authors:  Jayanta K Chakrabarty; Aishwarya G Naik; Michael B Fessler; Gerhard R Munske; Saiful M Chowdhury
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Cross-linking and mass spectrometry methodologies to facilitate structural biology: finding a path through the maze.

Authors:  Eric D Merkley; John R Cort; Joshua N Adkins
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2013-08-07

6.  EThcD and 213 nm UVPD for Top-Down Analysis of Bovine Seminal Plasma Proteoforms on Electrophoretic and Chromatographic Time Frames.

Authors:  Fabio P Gomes; Jolene K Diedrich; Anthony J Saviola; Erdogan Memili; Arlindo A Moura; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Quirks of Error Estimation in Cross-Linking/Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lutz Fischer; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  An integrated workflow for crosslinking mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marta L Mendes; Lutz Fischer; Zhuo A Chen; Marta Barbon; Francis J O'Reilly; Sven H Giese; Michael Bohlke-Schneider; Adam Belsom; Therese Dau; Colin W Combe; Martin Graham; Markus R Eisele; Wolfgang Baumeister; Christian Speck; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Dynamics of ribosomal protein S1 on a bacterial ribosome with cross-linking and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Matthew A Lauber; Juri Rappsilber; James P Reilly
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Richard G Côté; Attila Csordas; José A Dianes; Antonio Fabregat; Joseph M Foster; Johannes Griss; Emanuele Alpi; Melih Birim; Javier Contell; Gavin O'Kelly; Andreas Schoenegger; David Ovelleiro; Yasset Pérez-Riverol; Florian Reisinger; Daniel Ríos; Rui Wang; Henning Hermjakob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interpretation of anomalously long crosslinks in ribosome crosslinking reveals the ribosome interaction in stationary phase E. coli.

Authors:  Santosh A Misal; Bingqing Zhao; James P Reilly
Journal:  RSC Chem Biol       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 2.  Cleavable Cross-Linkers and Mass Spectrometry for the Ultimate Task of Profiling Protein-Protein Interaction Networks in Vivo.

Authors:  Manuel Matzinger; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.466

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.