Literature DB >> 32496395

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Lacrimal Practice: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nasal Endoscopy and Dacryoendoscopy.

Mohammad Javed Ali.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32496395      PMCID: PMC7437426          DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   2.011


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

Nasal endoscopy is quite a routine pre- and postoperative procedure in well-established lacrimal practices, while dacryoendoscopy has specific indications.[1] The unprecedented crisis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced cancellation of elective endoscopy procedures across the specialties, and lacrimal practice is no exception.[2] While this is important and is currently practiced, prolong deferral can be detrimental with respect to patient morbidity, healthcare, and economic loss. Hence, there is a need for better evidence-based understanding on the safety and optimal utilization of endoscopy for patient care during COVID-19 pandemic. The nasal tissues have demonstrated shedding of SARS-CoV-2 virus, and nasal interventions are potential aerosol generators.[3,4] Hence, lacrimal surgeons who perform endoscopy and their staff are at a high risk of virus transmission. This risk can be compounded by the face-to-face position with the patients during examination and the possible sneezing and coughing that can be induced by the procedure. The risk of nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy may be different because the duration of the procedure and its nature (diagnostic or therapeutic) can significantly alter the transmission risk.[5] Dacryoendoscopy usually takes a longer time and therapeutic procedures using it can notably enhance the risks. The triage of indications for nasal or dacryoendoscopy as emergency, urgency (can be deferred for up to 3–4 weeks with or without conservative management), and elective, even though arbitrary, can be helpful for surgeons to take decisions on operating during this pandemic. Table 1 summarizes these indications, which are by no means an exhaustive list and can itself be a subject of debate. Therefore, individual and institutional discretion based on local government guidelines is advised. Patients who are designated as urgent or elective and their endoscopy examination is deferred should be clearly communicated with and also receive such decisions in writing to avoid medicolegal issues or lawsuits.
TABLE 1.

Categorization of nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy indications

Categorization of nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy indications Table 2 summarizes the precautions to be taken while performing a nasal and a dacryoendoscopy. There are no evidence-based guidelines as to which among the flexible or rigid endoscopy is preferable during COVID-19.[4] The use of topical decongestants and local anesthetics is controversial. If used, the surgeon should preferably avoid spray and instead use soaked pledgets. Care should be taken during this step to avoid reflex sneezing or coughing. It is also important to remember that the virus remains viable on multiple surfaces for hours,[6,7] and the same can be true of endoscopes. Hence, systematic cleaning of all surfaces after endoscopy is crucial for disinfection. There are no special guidelines for sterilization and standard sterilization procedures for endoscopes and instruments are recommended. While performing dacryoendoscopy, it is natural to come in close proximity to the patients while passing the scope through the punctum and canaliculus. Hence, it is advisable to either use an operating microscope or magnifiers or loupes to avoid close contact with the patient’s face.
TABLE 2.

Precautions during nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy in lacrimal practice

Precautions during nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy in lacrimal practice The major question that remains is dealing with emergencies and urgent procedures in suspected COVID-19 patients. All such cases should undergo laboratory testing in the form of polymerase chain reaction test using a nasopharyngeal swab combined with an antibody testing (IgM and IgG). While emergency endoscopy may not be able to wait for the results, the procedure can be performed with full personal protective equipment. The urgent cases can wait for the laboratory results before the procedure. Hence, screening of the patients for COVID-19 symptoms, laboratory tests where needed, adherence to specific operating room guidelines, and personal protective equipment should facilitate performance of nasal endoscopy and dacryoendoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the medical communities would continue to experience numerous changes to their endoscopy practice, it would also be an opportunity to consider certain evolving concepts such as the use of imaging in lieu of endoscopy and the utility of disposable endoscopes.
  7 in total

1.  A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dacryoendoscopy.

Authors:  Swati Singh; Mohammad Javed Ali
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  EUS-guided gallbladder drainage during a pandemic crisis - How the COVID-19 outbreak could impact interventional endoscopy.

Authors:  Andrea Lisotti; Pietro Fusaroli
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 3.  Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents.

Authors:  G Kampf; D Todt; S Pfaender; E Steinmann
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients.

Authors:  Lirong Zou; Feng Ruan; Mingxing Huang; Lijun Liang; Huitao Huang; Zhongsi Hong; Jianxiang Yu; Min Kang; Yingchao Song; Jinyu Xia; Qianfang Guo; Tie Song; Jianfeng He; Hui-Ling Yen; Malik Peiris; Jie Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nasal, pharyngeal and laryngeal endoscopy procedures during COVID-19 pandemic: available recommendations from national and international societies.

Authors:  Pietro De Luca; Alfonso Scarpa; Massimo Ralli; Marco De Vincentiis; Ettore Cassandro; Giuseppe Chiarella; Claudia Cassandro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  German Endoscopy Unit Preparations for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Jakob Garbe; Stephan Eisenmann; Steffen Walter; Frank Lammert; Kaid Darwiche; Jonas Rosendahl
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 22.682

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  COVID-19 pandemic and lacrimal practice: Multipronged resumption strategies and getting back on our feet.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  A Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Lacrimal Surgery: The Asia-Pacific Perspective.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Natasha Narayanan; Mohammad Javed Ali
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.