R Park1, L Lopes1, A Saeed2. 1. Department of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, GI Oncology Working Group, Kansas City, KS, USA. asaeed@kumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have observed an association between immune-related adverse events (irAE) and favorable clinical outcomes in the setting of cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, results have been variable and inconclusive. Therefore, we have conducted a pan-cancer meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between irAEs and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search included studies published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from conception to 12.28.2019 as well as abstracts published in the ASCO and ESMO meetings from 2015 to 2019. Studies were included if ICI was used in advanced or metastatic cancer settings and excluded if data contained only combination therapy regimens or contained anti-CTLA-4. Raw data for overall response rate (ORR), hazard ratios (HR), number of patients (n), and p values for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the 2 × 2 table and logit transformed proportions; and summary receiver operating curve (sROC) was generated using the bivariate approach for ORR. Pooled HRs were calculated using the means weighted by inverse of the variance for OS and PFS. Heterogeneity was assumed and random effects model was used throughout the analyses. RESULTS: Final analysis included 32 studies, among which ORR data were available in 15 studies, OS in 17, and PFS in 16. 17 studies evaluated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), two studies melanoma, one study gastric cancer, three studies renal cell carcinoma (RCC), seven studies various cancer types, two studies urothelial carcinoma, and one study head and neck cancer (HNSCC). With respect to ORR, pooled SN, SP, PPV and NPV, and OR were 0.522 [0.423-0.619], 0.810 [0.771-0.844], 0.516 [0.413-0.618], 0.819 [0.764-0.864], and 4.59 [3.24-6.50], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) derived from the sROC was 0.773. HR for OS and PFS were 0.47 [95% CI 0.37-0.60] and 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.56], respectively. Between-study publication bias was present for ORR, OS, and PFS; however, results remained significant after trim-fill analysis. CONCLUSION: irAEs predict OR, OS, and PFS across different types of cancer and may represent useful biomarkers in the clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have observed an association between immune-related adverse events (irAE) and favorable clinical outcomes in the setting of cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, results have been variable and inconclusive. Therefore, we have conducted a pan-cancer meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between irAEs and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search included studies published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from conception to 12.28.2019 as well as abstracts published in the ASCO and ESMO meetings from 2015 to 2019. Studies were included if ICI was used in advanced or metastatic cancer settings and excluded if data contained only combination therapy regimens or contained anti-CTLA-4. Raw data for overall response rate (ORR), hazard ratios (HR), number of patients (n), and p values for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the 2 × 2 table and logit transformed proportions; and summary receiver operating curve (sROC) was generated using the bivariate approach for ORR. Pooled HRs were calculated using the means weighted by inverse of the variance for OS and PFS. Heterogeneity was assumed and random effects model was used throughout the analyses. RESULTS: Final analysis included 32 studies, among which ORR data were available in 15 studies, OS in 17, and PFS in 16. 17 studies evaluated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), two studies melanoma, one study gastric cancer, three studies renal cell carcinoma (RCC), seven studies various cancer types, two studies urothelial carcinoma, and one study head and neck cancer (HNSCC). With respect to ORR, pooled SN, SP, PPV and NPV, and OR were 0.522 [0.423-0.619], 0.810 [0.771-0.844], 0.516 [0.413-0.618], 0.819 [0.764-0.864], and 4.59 [3.24-6.50], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) derived from the sROC was 0.773. HR for OS and PFS were 0.47 [95% CI 0.37-0.60] and 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.56], respectively. Between-study publication bias was present for ORR, OS, and PFS; however, results remained significant after trim-fill analysis. CONCLUSION: irAEs predict OR, OS, and PFS across different types of cancer and may represent useful biomarkers in the clinical setting.
Authors: Biagio Ricciuti; Carlo Genova; Andrea De Giglio; Maria Bassanelli; Maria Giovanna Dal Bello; Giulio Metro; Marta Brambilla; Sara Baglivo; Francesco Grossi; Rita Chiari Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Douglas B Johnson; Jennifer Bordeaux; Ju Young Kim; Christine Vaupel; David L Rimm; Thai H Ho; Richard W Joseph; Adil I Daud; Robert M Conry; Elizabeth M Gaughan; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Anastasios Dimou; Pauline Funchain; James Smithy; John S Witte; Svetlana B McKee; Jennifer Ko; John M Wrangle; Bashar Dabbas; Shabnam Tangri; Jelveh Lameh; Jeffrey Hall; Joseph Markowitz; Justin M Balko; Naveen Dakappagari Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephanie G Downey; Jacob A Klapper; Franz O Smith; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Richard E Royal; Udai S Kammula; Marybeth S Hughes; Tamika E Allen; Catherine L Levy; Michael Yellin; Geoffrey Nichol; Donald E White; Seth M Steinberg; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Troy Z Horvat; Nelly G Adel; Thu-Oanh Dang; Parisa Momtaz; Michael A Postow; Margaret K Callahan; Richard D Carvajal; Mark A Dickson; Sandra P D'Angelo; Kaitlin M Woo; Katherine S Panageas; Jedd D Wolchok; Paul B Chapman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexander M M Eggermont; Michal Kicinski; Christian U Blank; Mario Mandala; Georgina V Long; Victoria Atkinson; Stéphane Dalle; Andrew Haydon; Adnan Khattak; Matteo S Carlino; Shahneen Sandhu; James Larkin; Susana Puig; Paolo A Ascierto; Piotr Rutkowski; Dirk Schadendorf; Rutger Koornstra; Leonel Hernandez-Aya; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh; Jean-Jacques Grob; Ralf Gutzmer; Rahima Jamal; Paul C Lorigan; Clemens Krepler; Nageatte Ibrahim; Sandrine Marreaud; Alexander van Akkooi; Caroline Robert; Stefan Suciu Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Kimberly Tang; Bruce C Tiu; Guihong Wan; Shijia Zhang; Nga Nguyen; Bonnie Leung; Alexander Gusev; Kerry L Reynolds; Shawn G Kwatra; Yevgeniy R Semenov Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 11.816