Literature DB >> 32495066

Availability and Variability of Consumer Prices for Lumbar Discectomy Across US Hospitals in 2018.

Alexander J Butler1, Caroline J Granger2, Sebastian Rivera3, Chester J Donnally4, Alexander Ghasem5, Deborah Li2, Michael Y Wang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability and variability of consumer pricing data for an elective lumbar discectomy in the USA.
METHODS: Hospital representatives were contacted via telephone, hospital websites, and state price-transparency websites. A total of 153 hospitals were contacted via telephone calls under the guise of a patient requesting a self-pay price for elective lumbar discectomy. The same hospitals were then researched for price comparison between those requested by phone and those listed on hospital websites after installment of the price transparency law by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on 1 January 2019. Complete and partial prices were recorded for both datasets when available. Hospitals were grouped based on profit status, teaching status, and geographical region. Statistical analysis compared rates of price availability and mean prices between hospital groups and between datasets.
RESULTS: Thirty-four (23.0%) of 148 hospitals included in the final analysis were able to provide complete price information via telephone. An additional 70 (47.3%) were able to provide a partial price. A total of four (2.7%) institutions provided a complete price and an additional 65 (43.9%) provided a partial price via website. The mean complete price for microdiscectomy when provided was $27,342.36 (n = 34). When compared to government and non-profit hospitals combined, private hospitals had significantly lower partial-prices.
CONCLUSION: A patient seeking to undergo a common surgical procedure in the USA will likely be met with difficulty and few options if motivated by price. A high degree of variability exists among US hospitals in 2018 with regards to availability and comprehensiveness of pricing information.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32495066     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00592-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  15 in total

1.  How much savings can we wring from Medicare?

Authors:  Michael Chernew; Dana Goldman; Sarah Axeen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Kai Zheng; Dianne C Singer; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Toward a 21st-century health care system: recommendations for health care reform.

Authors:  Kenneth Arrow; Alan Auerbach; John Bertko; Shannon Brownlee; Lawrence P Casalino; Jim Cooper; Francis J Crosson; Alain Enthoven; Elizabeth Falcone; Robert C Feldman; Victor R Fuchs; Alan M Garber; Marthe R Gold; Dana Goldman; Gillian K Hadfield; Mark A Hall; Ralph I Horwitz; Michael Hooven; Peter D Jacobson; Timothy Stoltzfus Jost; Lawrence J Kotlikoff; Jonathan Levin; Sharon Levine; Richard Levy; Karen Linscott; Harold S Luft; Robert Mashal; Daniel McFadden; David Mechanic; David Meltzer; Joseph P Newhouse; Roger G Noll; Jan B Pietzsch; Philip Pizzo; Robert D Reischauer; Sara Rosenbaum; William Sage; Leonard D Schaeffer; Edward Sheen; B Michael Silber; Jonathan Skinner; Stephen M Shortell; Samuel O Thier; Sean Tunis; Lucien Wulsin; Paul Yock; Gabi Bin Nun; Stirling Bryan; Osnat Luxenburg; Wynand P M M van de Ven
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Increased price transparency in health care--challenges and potential effects.

Authors:  Anna D Sinaiko; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.

Authors:  Chester J Donnally; Eric S Roth; Deborah J Li; James A Maguire; Johnathon R McCormick; Grant P Barker; Sebastian Rivera; Nathan H Lebwohl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals?

Authors:  Shoshanna Sofaer; Christine Crofton; Elizabeth Goldstein; Elizabeth Hoy; Jenny Crabb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Do popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings identify hospitals with better cardiovascular surgery outcomes?

Authors:  Nicholas H Osborne; Lauren H Nicholas; Amir A Ghaferi; Gilbert R Upchurch; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.

Authors:  Bassam Kadry; Larry F Chu; Bayan Kadry; Danya Gammas; Alex Macario
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Variation in the cost of care for primary total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Derek A Haas; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 10.  Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.

Authors:  Christopher M Burkle; Mark T Keegan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.