| Literature DB >> 32494907 |
Laura J Corbin1,2, David A Hughes1,2, Andrew J Chetwynd3,4, Amy E Taylor2,5, Andrew D Southam3,4, Andris Jankevics3,4, Ralf J M Weber3,4, Alix Groom1,2, Warwick B Dunn3,4,6, Nicholas J Timpson7,8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: High plasma triacylglyceride levels are known to be associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) is a key regulator of plasma triacylglyceride levels and is associated with hypertriglyceridemia via a number of pathways. There is consistent evidence for an association of cardiovascular events with blood apoC-III level, with support from human genetic studies of APOC3 variants. As such, apoC-III has been recognised as a potential therapeutic target for patients with severe hypertriglyceridaemia with one of the most promising apoC-III-targeting drugs, volanesorsen, having recently progressed through Phase III trials.Entities:
Keywords: ALSPAC; APOC3; Genotype; Metabolites; Recall-by-genotype; Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32494907 PMCID: PMC7270992 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-020-01689-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Fig. 1An overview of the data processing pipeline. PQN probabilistic quotient normalization, QC quality control, RSD relative standard deviation, SD standard deviations. Dashed lines indicate the flow for sensitivity analyses
Sample characteristics
| Young participants | Mothers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carriers | Non-carriers | Carriers | Non-carriers | |
| No. of samples (carriers/non-carriers) | 21 | 42 | 30 | 22 |
| No. of fasted samples (carriers/non-carriers)a | 21 | 42 | 21 | 22 |
| No. of unique individuals (carriers/non-carriers) | 15 | 42 | 11 | 22 |
| Sex (% females)b | 47.6% | 47.6% | 100% | 100% |
| Age (years) at sampling (mean, standard deviation)b | 16.2 (1.2) | 16.2 (1.2)n | 49.6 (6.0) | 47.2 (5.1)n |
| Body mass index (mean, standard deviation)b | 21.6 (3.2) | 22.3 (4.3)n | 24.8 (3.7) | 25.4 (4.5)n |
| HDL mmol/L (mean, standard deviation)c | 1.62 (0.30) | 1.19 (0.25)*** | 1.93 (0.49) | 1.42 (0.25)** |
| LDL mmol/L (mean, standard deviation)c | 2.12 (0.45) | 1.89 (0.63)n | 2.56 (0.43) | 3.16 (0.80)* |
| TAG mmol/L (mean, standard deviation)c | 0.45 (0.06) | 0.81 (0.39)*** | 0.59 (0.14) | 1.03 (0.40)** |
aNon-fasting samples were excluded from the primary analysis
bCalculated across all samples (rather than unique individuals)
cUsing all available data (n = 39 young participants; n = 32 mothers); HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, TAG triacylglycerides. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test (Bauer 1972; Hollander and Wolfe 1999) was performed in R v3.6.1 (R Core Team 2019) to test for a difference in quantitative traits between carriers and non-carriers: n = p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
The distribution across (selected) metabolite classes of identified metabolites from the primary analysis (for full table see Supplementary Table S4)
| Metabolite class | No. of associated features (% of total) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined | Young participants | Mothers | |
| Acyl-acyl GPL | 39 (28%) | 34 (37%) | 0 |
| Triacylglyceride | 35 (26%) | 7 (8%) | 9 (75%) |
| Ceramide | 24 (18%) | 20 (22%) | 0 |
| Diacylglyceride | 14 (10%) | 10 (11%) | 1 (8%) |
| Acyl-alkyl GPL | 10 (7%) | 8 (9%) | 0 |
| Sphingolipid | 5 (4%) | 6 (7%) | 0 |
| Total | 137 | 92 | 12 |
GPL Glycerophospholipid
Fig. 2Heatmap showing the 137 unique associated metabolites based on data from the combined dataset residualised on age and sex. M.Class = metabolite class (see plot for colour key), GPL = glycerophospholipid, G.group = genotype group (red = young participants, non-carriers; dark red = mothers, non-carriers; green = young participants, carriers of the ‘A’ allele; dark green = mothers, carriers of the ‘A’ allele (colour figure online)
Fig. 3Effect sizes by metabolite class. Effect estimates (betas) taken from linear mixed model with age, sex and pedigree fitted, and using the combined dataset after rank-normal transformation. The same plot ordered by effect estimates (beta) (instead of mass to charge ratio (m/z)) can be found in Fig. S5 (colour figure online)