| Literature DB >> 32494118 |
Abdelhamid Elhofi1, Hany Ahmed Helaly1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with a collagen implant versus trabeculectomy in primary congenital glaucoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective interventional comparative non-randomized clinical study that included 80 eyes of 80 children presenting with primary congenital glaucoma under the age of 3 years. Forty eyes have undergone non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and the other 40 eyes have undergone penetrating trabeculectomy. The main outcome measure was the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP). Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients with complete and qualified success, need for topical antiglaucoma medications, rate of complications, and need for further interventions. Complete success of the surgical outcome was considered an IOP ≤16 mmHg with no antiglaucoma medications. Qualified success was considered an IOP ≤16 mmHg using antiglaucoma medications.Entities:
Keywords: childhood glaucoma; deep sclerectomy; non-penetrating; non-penetrating deep sclerectomy; primary congenital glaucoma; trabeculectomy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32494118 PMCID: PMC7229790 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S253689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Characteristics of the Patients in the Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Group and the Trabeculectomy Group
| Deep Sclerectomy Group (n = 40) | Trabeculectomy Group (n = 40) | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 14.5 ± 13.1 (3–36) | 13.7 ± 12.2 (3–35) | 0.521 |
| Sex (Male:Female) | 24:16 | 26:14 | 0.644 |
| Preop. IOP (mmHg) | 27.4 ± 6.9 (19.0–38.0) | 28.5 ± 6.6 (22.0–36.0) | 0.175 |
| Preop. corneal diameter (mm) | 12.5 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 12.6 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 0.422 |
| Preop. cup/disc ratio | 0.5 ± 0.2 (0.3–0.9) | 0.6 ± 0.3 (0.4–0.9) | 0.388 |
Note: *Using independent samples t test or chi-square test where appropriate.
The Intraocular Pressure Changes Before and After Surgery in the Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Group and the Trabeculectomy Group
| Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) | Deep Sclerectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | Trabeculectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 27.4 ± 6.9 (19.0–38.0) | 28.5 ± 6.6 (22.0–36.0) | 0.175 |
| 1 week | 4.3 ± 2.8 (2.0–7.0) | 2.1 ± 1.2 (0.0–4.0) | 0.021** |
| 1 month | 9.5 ± 4.6 (4.0–17.0) | 8.1 ± 3.9 (4.0–12.0) | 0.034** |
| 3 months | 10.9 ± 4.3 (6.0–19.0) | 11.3 ± 3.1 (8.0–18.0) | 0.121 |
| 6 months | 11.3 ± 4.5 (8.0–20.0) | 11.5 ± 3.9 (8.0–19.0) | 0.254 |
| 12 months | 11.4 ± 4.5 (8.0–20.0) | 11.6 ± 4.1 (8.0–20.0) | 0.311 |
| 24 months | 11.3 ± 4.6 (8.0–20.0) | 11.5 ± 3.8 (9.0–19.0) | 0.303 |
| 36 months | 11.2 ± 4.5 (8.0–18.0) | 11.1 ± 3.4 (8.0–16.0) | 0.342 |
Notes: *Using independent samples t test. **Statistically significant.
The Mean Corneal Diameter Among the Deep Sclerectomy and Trabeculectomy Groups
| Corneal Diameter (mm) | Deep Sclerectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | Trabeculectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 12.5 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 12.6 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 0.422 |
| 1 week | 12.5 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 12.6 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 0.401 |
| 1 month | 12.4 ± 0.6 (11.5–13.0) | 12.6 ± 0.6 (11.5–13.0) | 0.387 |
| 3 months | 12.6 ± 0.8 (12.0–13.5) | 12.7 ± 0.8 (11.5–13.5) | 0.389 |
| 6 months | 12.7 ± 0.7 (12.0–13.5) | 12.5 ± 0.7 (11.5–13.0) | 0.411 |
| 12 months | 12.6 ± 0.8 (11.5–13.5) | 12.6 ± 0.6 (12.0–13.5) | 0.382 |
| 24 months | 12.7 ± 0.6 (12.0–13.5) | 12.6 ± 0.6 (11.5–13.0) | 0.420 |
| 36 months | 12.6 ± 0.7 (12.0–13.5) | 12.6 ± 0.7 (12.0–13.5) | 0.454 |
Note: *Using independent samples t test.
The Mean Cup/Disc Ratio Among the Deep Sclerectomy and Trabeculectomy Groups
| Cup/Disc Ratio | Deep Sclerectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | Trabeculectomy Mean ± SD (Range) | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 0.4 ± 0.2 (0.3–0.9) | 0.5 ± 0.3 (0.4–0.9) | 0.388 |
| 1 week | 0.4 ± 0.2 (0.2–0.7) | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.2–0.7) | 0.422 |
| 1 month | 0.3 ± 0.1 (0.1–0.6) | 0.3 ± 0.1 (0.2–0.7) | 0.399 |
| 3 months | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.5) | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.378 |
| 6 months | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.5) | 0.2 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.422 |
| 12 months | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.421 |
| 24 months | 0.3 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.2 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.7) | 0.395 |
| 36 months | 0.2 ± 0.2 (0.1–0.5) | 0.2 ± 0.3 (0.1–0.6) | 0.434 |
Note: *Using independent samples t test.
The Success and Failure Rates Among the Deep Sclerectomy and Trabeculectomy Groups
| Deep Sclerectomy No. (%) | Trabeculectomy No. (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Success | Qualified Success | Failure | Complete Success | Qualified Success | Failure | |
| 1 week | 40 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 40 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 1 month | 38 (95) | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 40 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 3 months | 30 (75) | 7 (17.5) | 3 (7.5) | 32 (80) | 5 (12.5) | 3 (7.5) |
| 6 months | 27 (67.5) | 8 (20) | 5 (12.5) | 27 (67.5) | 8 (20) | 5 (12.5) |
| 12 months | 25 (62.5) | 9 (22.5) | 6 (15) | 24 (60) | 10 (25) | 6 (15) |
| 24 months | 25 (62.5) | 9 (22.5) | 6 (15) | 23 (57.5) | 10 (25) | 7 (17.5) |
| 36 months | 24 (60) | 10 (25) | 6 (15) | 23 (57.5) | 10 (25) | 7 (17.5) |
Figure 1Survival analysis curve for overall success rates among non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy groups.