Literature DB >> 32494097

Investigating Visual-Spatial Abilities in Students and Expert Physical Therapists.

Felicity Radan1, Nicole Johnston1, Chi Hai Nguyen1, Alexander Restrepo1, Rachel Varga1, Kara K Patterson1,2,3, Dina Brooks1,2,3,4,5, Julie Vaughan-Graham1,2,6.   

Abstract

Purpose: Visual-spatial abilities (VSAs) - the aptitude for mentally processing, retaining, and manipulating visual input - are used by physical therapists in movement analysis. Superior VSAs have been demonstrated in experts compared with novices in other fields, including surgery, anatomy, and aviation, but no literature has investigated VSAs in physical therapy. The purpose of this study was to quantify VSAs in expert and student physical therapists and investigate the differences between the two groups. Our results could assist future researchers in identifying areas for skill development and improved clinical competency in students and novice therapists. Method: Expert physical therapists and first-year PT students completed four computerized VSA tests in the Psychology Experiment Building Language programme: Four-Choice Response, Sequential Pattern Comparison, Mental Rotation, and Situation Awareness.
Results: A total of 16 participants were recruited for each group. Expert physical therapists responded more accurately to the Four-Choice Response test, but not significantly so (p = 0.06), and with a significantly slower response time than student physical therapists (p = 0.03). No other differences were found. Conclusions: These findings suggest that expert physical therapists use selective attention more effectively and may value accuracy over speed. No differences were found in other measures of VSAs. Further studies are required to confirm and expand our findings. © Canadian Physiotherapy Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mental processes; neuropsychological tests; spatial processing; students

Year:  2020        PMID: 32494097      PMCID: PMC7238925          DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of observational gait analysis data: judgments of push-off in gait after stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer L McGinley; Patricia A Goldie; Kenneth M Greenwood; Sandra J Olney
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-02

2.  Visual spatial ability for surgical trainees: implications for learning endoscopic, laparoscopic surgery and other image-guided procedures.

Authors:  Patrick Henn; Anthony G Gallagher; Emmeline Nugent; Neal E Seymour; Randy S Haluck; Hazem Hseino; Oscar Traynor; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomy.

Authors:  Ruth Fernandez; Itiel E Dror; Claire Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Stéphane Champely; Christophe Batier; Patrice Thiriet; Christian Collet
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Visual spatial perception and surgical competence.

Authors:  Donald A Risucci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Brian J Piper
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Over the hill at 24: persistent age-related cognitive-motor decline in reaction times in an ecologically valid video game task begins in early adulthood.

Authors:  Joseph J Thompson; Mark R Blair; Andrew J Henrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of the validity of the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests of vigilance, auditory memory, and decision making.

Authors:  Brian Piper; Shane T Mueller; Sara Talebzadeh; Min Jung Ki
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults.

Authors:  Brian J Piper; Shane T Mueller; Alexander R Geerken; Kyle L Dixon; Gregory Kroliczak; Reid H J Olsen; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.