| Literature DB >> 32493745 |
Daniel Franklin1,2, Ziqian He3, Pamela Mastranzo Ortega2, Alireza Safaei1,2, Pablo Cencillo-Abad2, Shin-Tson Wu3, Debashis Chanda4,2,3.
Abstract
Nanostructured plasmonic materials can lead to the extremely compact pixels and color filters needed for next-generation displays by interacting with light at fundamentally small length scales. However, previous demonstrations suffer from severe angle sensitivity, lack of saturated color, and absence of black/gray states and/or are impractical to integrate with actively addressed electronics. Here, we report a vivid self-assembled nanostructured system which overcomes these challenges via the multidimensional hybridization of plasmonic resonances. By exploiting the thin-film growth mechanisms of aluminum during ultrahigh vacuum physical vapor deposition, dense arrays of particles are created in near-field proximity to a mirror. The sub-10-nm gaps between adjacent particles and mirror lead to strong multidimensional coupling of localized plasmonic modes, resulting in a singular resonance with negligible angular dispersion and ∼98% absorption of incident light at a desired wavelength. The process is compatible with arbitrarily structured substrates and can produce wafer-scale, diffusive, angle-independent, and flexible plasmonic materials. We then demonstrate the unique capabilities of the strongly coupled plasmonic system via integration with an actively addressed reflective liquid crystal display with control over black states. The hybrid display is readily programmed to display images and video.Entities:
Keywords: color; display; liquid crystal; nanoscience; plasmonic
Year: 2020 PMID: 32493745 PMCID: PMC7306820 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001435117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Self-assembled plasmonic system and particle statistics. (A) Schematic of self-assembled aluminum particles atop an oxide spacer and aluminum mirror. Wavelength of plasmon resonance scales with particle size. (B) Camera images and scanning electron microscope images of three sampled surfaces corresponding to yellow, magenta, and cyan. (C) Histogram of particle sizes obtained from the SEM images shown in B. Radii for particles are calculated assuming an area equivalent sphere.
Fig. 2.Particle size-dependent plasmonic color and quality. (A) Camera image of a 1- × 2-in. sample in which the amount of aluminum deposited is azimuthally varied. This changes the size of particles and results in the reflectance spectra seen in B. White dotted lines indicate thicknesses corresponding to 4, 7.5, and 11 MET. (C) The CIELAB space diagram where black dots indicate values for the surface color in A and B. Black outlines indicate print industry standards ISO 12647-3 for the inner hexagon and SWOP coated 1, ISO-standard on grade 1 high-quality photo paper for the outer hexagon. (D) Reflectance measurements of the surface compared to discrete dipole approximation theory and finite difference time domain modeling. (E) Field profiles obtained through FDTD at resonance showing field confinement in the gaps between particles. (F) Finite element method modeling of an MIM system as a function of top metal thickness. (G) FDTD simulations predicting resonance location as a function of particle diameter. The dotted red line shows the MIM model resonance location, while the dotted black line shows the hybrid MIM model taking into account finite film thickness. The solid black line indicates the experimentally observed location. (H) FDTD simulations over interparticle distance in which the shift in resonance location from the MIM model and experiment is found to be due to near-field coupling of adjacent particles.
Fig. 3.Angle-independent, diffuse, and flexible plasmonic color. (A) Top experimental row is obtained through angle-resolved reflectance measurements using an integrating sphere and fiber optic coupled spectrometer. The bottom row consists of FDTD simulations using a perfectly periodic square array of particles. Adjacent to each dataset is the projected color of the surface obtained using the CIE chromaticity matching functions. (B) Fabrication performed on a thin, flexible layer of PDMS (2 × 3 in.) and (C) masked fabrication of the aluminum particles in the form of the UCF Pegasus logo (2 × 3 in. sample). (D) Microscope images of the surface fabricated on a 100% polyethylene terephthalate fabric.
Fig. 4.Active addressing and LCD integration. (A) Schematic illustration and working principle of the 80° mixed–twisted–nematic reflective display. (B) Camera image of the 2.7-in. diagonal display before and after particle coating. Microscope images depict single pixels. (C) Microscope images of the completed display and demonstration of individual pixel control. (D) Camera images of the display showing various logos and symbols. (E) Time series of the “bee” as it has a sinusoidal trajectory across the active region of the display. The functional display can be seen in Movie S1.