| Literature DB >> 32493423 |
Bishnu Adhikari1, Young Min Kwon2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA gene has provided invaluable insights into diverse microbial communities. Recently a few studies have attempted to use 16S rRNA gene microbiota profiling in combination with the conventional culture methods to explore bacterial communities. In this "culture-enriched microbiota profiling" approach, microbes in a sample are cultured on solid media, and the resulting colonies are combined and subjected to 16S rRNA gene microbiota profiling. Here we investigated the effect of cell densities as determined by varying levels of sample dilution on the culture-enriched microbiota profiles using De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar medium as a model system.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; Cell density; Culture-enriched; MRS agar; Microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32493423 PMCID: PMC7268277 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05113-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Relative abundance of major bacterial genera recovered on MRS plates from different dilutions. M-LOW, M-MEDIUM, and M-HIGH represent bacterial population recovered on MRS from 102, 104, and 106 fold dilutions, respectively
Fig. 2Relative abundance of major Lactobacillus species recovered on MRS plates from different dilutions. M-LOW, M-MEDIUM, and M-HIGH represent bacterial population recovered on MRS from 102, 104, and 106 fold dilutions, respectively
Summary of the relative abundance levels of different taxonomic groups
| Level | Taxa | T-ZERO (%) | M-LOW (%) | M-MEDIUM (%) | M-HIGH (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Firmicutes | (82.03 ± 7.52)a | (93.35 ± 3.82)a | (94.91 ± 3.97)a | (91.68 ± 5.84)a |
| Proteobacteria | (17.97 ± 7.52)a | (6.12 ± 3.33)a | (5.09 ± 3.97)a | (7.98 ± 5.85)a | |
| Genus | Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) | ||||
| (69.01 ± 6.15)a | (81.21 ± 4.48)a | (77.82 ± 5.27)a | (70.01 ± 5.07)a | ||
| (1.24 ± 1.24)b | (5.62 ± 2.31)ab | (12.11 ± 3.66)a | 16.37 ± 5.64)a | ||
| (0.00 ± 0.00)b | (0.00 ± 0.00)b | (1.31 ± 0.67)ab | (3.50 ± 1.47)a | ||
| (0.00 ± 0.00)a | (1.78 ± 1.22)a | (0.49 ± 0.49)a | (0.66 ± 0.66)a | ||
| Other than LAB | |||||
| (0.00 ± 0.00)a | (0.59 ± 0.59)a | (0.00 ± 0.00)a | (0.00 ± 0.00)a | ||
| (11.76 ± 1.72)a | (3.11 ± 1.85)b | (1.93 ± 0.99)b | (1.16 ± 0.77)b | ||
| (1.69 ± 1.69)a | (4.03 ± 3.40)a | (4.03 ± 4.03)a | (6.74 ± 5.96)a | ||
| Other grouping | |||||
| Non | (30.99 ± 6.15)a | (18.79 ± 4.48)a | (22.18 ± 5.27)a | (29.99 ± 5.07)a | |
| LAB other than | (1.24 ± 1.24)c | (7.99 ± 2.98)bc | (13.91 ± 4.08)ab | (20.52 ± 5.24)a | |
| Other than LAB | (29.74 ± 6.00)a | (10.80 ± 4.80)b | (8.27 ± 3.90)b | (9.47 ± 5.76)b | |
| Species | (0.00 ± 0.00)b | (4.66 ± 1.44)a | (4.56 ± 1.23)a | (3.12 ± 1.39)ab | |
| (6.76 ± 1.77)a | (1.70 ± 0.84)b | (0.00 ± 0.00)b | (1.00 ± 1.00)b | ||
| (16.38 ± 1.56)b | (18.85 ± 1.74)ab | 21.66 ± 2.13)ab | (23.53 ± 3.19)a | ||
| (0.00 ± 0.00)b | (0.64 ± 0.64)ab | (1.72 ± 0.87)a | (0.54 ± 0.54)ab | ||
Values are presented in mean ± SEM (Standard Errors of Means). Different letters across each row show statistically significance at p < 0.05 (ANOVA, Student t test). L. acidophilus only present on M-HIGH, absent in all other groups (0.33 ± 0.33) %. Other species didn’t show any significant differences among different groups