| Literature DB >> 32493393 |
Chao-Wei Lee1,2,3, Ming-Chin Yu1,2,3, Gigin Lin4,5,6, Jo-Chu Chiu2, Meng-Han Chiang4, Chang-Mu Sung2,3,7, Yi-Chung Hsieh3,7, Tony Kuo3,7, Cheng-Yu Lin3,7, Hsin-I Tsai8,9,10.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver with a dismal prognosis. Vascular invasion, among others, is the most robust indicator of postoperative recurrence and overall survival after liver resection for HCC. Few studies to date have attempted to search for effective markers to predict vascular invasion before the operation. The current study would examine the plasma metabolic profiling via 1H-NMR of HCC patients undergoing liver resection and aim to search for potential biomarkers in the early detection of HCC with normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and the diagnosis of vascular invasion preoperatively.Entities:
Keywords: Formate; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatoma; Metabolites; Metabolomics; Vascular invasion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32493393 PMCID: PMC7271504 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01885-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Patient demographics and tumor characteristics of the investigation cohort (n = 35)
| No (%) | |
|---|---|
| ≦ | 20 (57.1) |
| > | 15 (42.9) |
| 27 (77.1) | |
| 8 (22.9) | |
| 11 (31.4) | |
| 24 (68.6) | |
| 6 (17.1) | |
| 29 (82.9) | |
| 23 (65.7) | |
| 12 (34.3) | |
| 8 (22.9) | |
| 27 (77.1) | |
| 14 (40.0) | |
| 21 (60.0) | |
| 20 (57.1) | |
| 15 (42.9) | |
| 14 (40.0) | |
| 21 (60.0) | |
| 27 (77.1) | |
| 8 (22.9) | |
| 9 (25.7) | |
| 26 (74.3) | |
| 24 (68.6) | |
| 11 (31.4) | |
| 28 (80.0) | |
| 7 (20.0) | |
| 14 (40.0) | |
| 21 (60.0) | |
| 3 (8.6) | |
| 32 (91.4) | |
| 4 (11.4) | |
| 31 (88.6) | |
| 0 (0) | |
| 35 (100) | |
| 4(11.8)/10(28.6) | |
| 18(52.9)/3(8.8) | |
| 4 (11.4) | |
| 31 (88.6) |
aTumor recurrence within 2 years after surgery
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between investigation cohort (n = 35) and validation cohort (n = 22)
| Categorical variables ( | Continuous variables (mean ± SE) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation | Validation | Investigation | Validation | ||||
| 27 (77.1) | 19 (86.4) | 0.502 | 62.7 ± 1.9 | 60.2 ± 2.4 | 0.429 | ||
| 23 (65.7) | 11 (50.0) | 0.277 | 23.9 ± 0.5 | 25.6 ± 0.7 | 0.063 | ||
| 8 (22.9) | 9 (40.9) | 0.234 | 9.53 ± 0.88 | 11.44 ± 1.64 | 0.316 | ||
| 21 (60.0) | 10 (45.5) | 0.413 | 16096 ± 12568 | 17938 ± 17777 | 0.931 | ||
| 9 (25.7) | 6 (27.3) | 1.000 | 6.07 ± 4.07 | 1.57 ± 0.20 | 0.361 | ||
| 28 (80.0) | 22 (100.0) | 0.036 | 26.6 ± 3.7 | 22.1 ± 3.9 | 0.421 | ||
| 14 (40.0) | 10 (45.5) | 0.785 | 4.59 ± 0.61 | 4.05 ± 0.68 | 0.557 | ||
| 4 (11.4) | 2 (9.1) | 1.000 | |||||
| 3 (8.6) | 1 (4.5) | 1.000 | |||||
| 14 (40.0) | 13 (59.1) | 0.184 | |||||
| 4(11.8)/10(28.6)/18(52.9)/3(8.8) | 3(13.6)/13(59.1)/5(22.7)/1(4.5) | 0.073 | |||||
Fig. 1Metabolome analysis by NMR in HCC. a Heatmap analysis in HCC with or without normal AFP. b1H-NMR plasma profiles using OPLS-DA. A separation is seen between the two groups. Red area denotes HCC patients with normal AFP levels (less than 15 ng/mL, N-HCC) while green area denotes HCC patients with abnormal AFP levels (greater or equal to 15 ng/mL, A-HCC)
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) observed serum metabolites with intensity differences associated with different AFP for hepatocellular carcinoma
| Metabolites | AFP < 15 ng/ml | AFP ≥ 15 ng/ml | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glycine | 26.128 ± 2.83 | 18.627 ± 1.09 | 0.006 |
| O-Acetylcarnitine | 0.600 ± 0.08 | 0.374 ± 0.11 | 0.025 |
| Histidine | 6.597 ± 0.36 | 5.532 ± 0.37 | 0.062 |
| Ornithine | 9.263 ± 1.05 | 7.065 ± 0.58 | 0.073 |
| Glycine | 26.810 ± 1.33 | 27.195 ± 2.19 | 0.752 |
| O-Acetylcarnitine | 0.958 ± 0.09 | 0.687 ± 0.08 | 0.032 |
| Histidine | 7.303 ± 0.32 | 6.070 ± 0.55 | 0.153 |
| Ornithine | 10.504 ± 0.86 | 9.061 ± 0.75 | 0.215 |
Metabolites were expressed as mean ± SE in arbitrary units
aStudent’s t test
Fig. 2ROC curves of O-acetylcarnitine for HCC with normal AFP. In the entire HCC group, O-acetylcarnitine has shown an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) or AUROC of 0.753 in the investigation group and an AUROC of 0.718 in the validation group for N-HCC
Fig. 3Metabolome analysis by NMR in HCC in association with vascular invasion. a Heatmap analysis with or without microscopic vascular invasion. b1H-NMR plasma profiles using OPLS-DA. A separation is seen between the two groups. Red area denotes HCC patients without vascular invasion while green area denotes HCC patients with vascular invasion
Fig. 4PLS-DA variable importance projection (VIP) scores. The metabolites responsible for the classification of VI or not would be identified using the variable importance in projection (VIP) scores. Metabolites with high VIP are more important in providing class separation, while those with small VIP provide less contribution [22]. Formate had the highest VIP score in terms of VI. Red or green on the right of Fig. 4 indicated the low or high concentration of metabolites by comparing the concentration of each metabolite in patients with (1) or without (0) vascular invasion
Clinical variables and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) observed serum metabolites with intensity differences associated with vascular invasion (VI) for hepatocellular carcinoma
| Metabolites | Without VI | With VI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor size (cm) | 3.47 ± 0.49 | 6.29 ± 1.22 | 0.047 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 6541.91 ± 6486.76 | 30428.30 ± 30156.35 | 0.360 |
| ICG-15 (%) | 9.80 ± 1.10 | 9.11 ± 1.54 | 0.711 |
| Formate | 19.697 ± 3.23 | 37.592 ± 7.83 | 0.023 |
| Tumor size (cm) | 3.80 ± 0.98 | 4.33 ± 0.95 | 0.710 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 145.82 ± 87.38 | 39289.31 ± 39109.13 | 0.343 |
| ICG-15 (%) | 13.18 ± 2.42 | 9.35 ± 2.10 | 0.256 |
| Formateb | 14.807 ± 1.48 | 18.776 ± 0.99 | 0.042 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SE
aStudent’s t test
bExpressed in arbitrary units
Fig. 5ROC curves of formate, tumor size, and AFP in diagnosing vascular invasion in HCC. Formate has shown an AUROC of 0.612 in the investigation group and an AUROC of 0.727 in the validation group in terms of predicting VI. Tumor size and AFP levels, on the other hand, have AUROC of 0.730 and 0.714 in the investigation group, and 0.591 and 0.591 in the validation group, respectively, for predicting VI
Fig. 6Prediction of vascular invasion in HCC using a combination of formate, tumor size, and AFP. When combining formate, AFP, and tumor size, the AUROC in predicting microscopic VI raised to 0.806 in the investigation group and 0.745 in the validation group