| Literature DB >> 32493320 |
Peng Xue1,2, Man Tat Alexander Ng3, Youlin Qiao4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) called for global action towards the elimination of cervical cancer. One of the main strategies is to screen 70% of women at the age between 35 and 45 years and 90% of women managed appropriately by 2030. So far, approximately 85% of cervical cancers occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The colposcopy-guided biopsy is crucial for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and becomes the main bottleneck limiting screening performance. Unprecedented advances in artificial intelligence (AI) enable the synergy of deep learning and digital colposcopy, which offers opportunities for automatic image-based diagnosis. To this end, we discuss the main challenges of traditional colposcopy and the solutions applying AI-guided digital colposcopy as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). MAIN BODY: Existing challenges for the application of colposcopy in LMICs include strong dependence on the subjective experience of operators, substantial inter- and intra-operator variabilities, shortage of experienced colposcopists, consummate colposcopy training courses, and uniform diagnostic standard and strict quality control that are hard to be followed by colposcopists with limited diagnostic ability, resulting in discrepant reporting and documentation of colposcopy impressions. Organized colposcopy training courses should be viewed as an effective way to enhance the diagnostic ability of colposcopists, but implementing these courses in practice may not always be feasible to improve the overall diagnostic performance in a short period of time. Fortunately, AI has the potential to address colposcopic bottleneck, which could assist colposcopists in colposcopy imaging judgment, detection of underlying CINs, and guidance of biopsy sites. The automated workflow of colposcopy examination could create a novel cervical cancer screening model, reduce potentially false negatives and false positives, and improve the accuracy of colposcopy diagnosis and cervical biopsy.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cervical cancer screening; Colposcopy diagnosis; Global elimination of cervical cancer
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32493320 PMCID: PMC7271416 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01613-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Fig. 1The diagnostic workflow of colposcopy clinic based on AI-guided digital colposcopy. Note: with abnormal screening results following cytology or HPV testing, women are generally referred to colposcopy clinic for AI-guided digital colposcopy evaluation, including biopsy spots as shown in green outline, and possibilities of cervical lesions. And the diagnostic results are later confirmed by pathology for the decision of clinical management (either immediate treatment or follow-up). During colposcopy examination, five sequential colposcopy images are captured and transmitted to one of two available clinical applications: (1) AI local server that is suitable for areas with poor network conditions and (2) AI Cloud that is for areas with good internet access. Both can provide a real-time response as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for colposcopists after they uploaded their colposcopic images to AI local server or the cloud platform. It also represents a useful training tool for new colposcopists. This Figure was created by the authors
The advancements in computer algorithms applying to cervical images
| Reference | Publish year | Aim of the study | Study design | Number of subjects | Image-generating devices | Type of algorithms | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simoes et al. [ | 2014 | Classification of colposcopy images | Retrospective | 170 images (training set 48; test and internal validation set 122) | Digital colposcopy | ANN | Accuracy 72.15% |
| Kim and Huang [ | 2013 | Detection of CIN2+ from normal/CIN1 | Retrospective | 2000 images (normal/CIN2 1000; CIN2+ 1000) | Cervicography (discontinued) | SVM | Sensitivity 75% Specificity 75% |
| Asiedu et al. [ | 2019 | Detection of CIN1+ against normal | Retrospective | 134 patients (training set 107; internal validation set 27) | Digital colposcopy | SVM | Accuracy 80% Sensitivity 81.3% Specificity 78.6% |
| Miyagi et al. [ | 2019 | Classification of CIN1 and CIN2+ | Retrospective | 310 images (both using in training and internal validation set) | Traditional colposcopy | Convolutional neural networks | Accuracy 82.3% Sensitivity 80% Specificity 88.2% |
| Song et al. [ | 2015 | Detection of CIN2+ | Retrospective | 7669 patients with < CIN2, 142 patients with CIN2+ (training set 7531; internal validation set 280) | Cervicography (discontinued) | Multimodal convolutional neural networks | Accuracy 89% Sensitivity 83.21% Specificity 94.79% |
| Schiffman et al. [ | 2019 | Detection of CIN2+ | Retrospective | 9127 patients with < CIN2, 279 patients with CIN2+ (training set 744, internal validation set 324, rest in screening set) | Cervicography (discontinued) | Faster R-CNN | AUC 0.91 |