BACKGROUND: Limited evidence indicates greater female-to-male (F-M) transmission of genital infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) relative to male-to-female (M-F). We verified the hypothesis of a differential transmission rate in couple-based studies by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published until December 2019. We calculated pooled estimates of F-M and M-F transmission rates and their rate differences per 100 person-months, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random-effects model. We counted occurrences of directionality preponderance for each HPV type. RESULTS: We identified 7 eligible studies published between 2008 and 2019, providing data for 752 couples. Pooled estimates for F-M and M-F transmission rates were 3.01 (95% CI, 1.19-7.64; I2 = 97%) and 1.60 (95% CI, 0.86-2.98; I2 = 89%), respectively. The overall rate difference was 0.61 (95% CI, -0.27 to 1.49; I2 = 75%). Three studies provided rates by sex and HPV genotype; 2 favored a preponderance of F-M and 1 favored M-F transmission. CONCLUSIONS: There was slight evidence for a differential transmission rate favoring higher F-M than M-F transmission with substantial statistical heterogeneity across studies.
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence indicates greater female-to-male (F-M) transmission of genital infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) relative to male-to-female (M-F). We verified the hypothesis of a differential transmission rate in couple-based studies by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published until December 2019. We calculated pooled estimates of F-M and M-F transmission rates and their rate differences per 100 person-months, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random-effects model. We counted occurrences of directionality preponderance for each HPV type. RESULTS: We identified 7 eligible studies published between 2008 and 2019, providing data for 752 couples. Pooled estimates for F-M and M-F transmission rates were 3.01 (95% CI, 1.19-7.64; I2 = 97%) and 1.60 (95% CI, 0.86-2.98; I2 = 89%), respectively. The overall rate difference was 0.61 (95% CI, -0.27 to 1.49; I2 = 75%). Three studies provided rates by sex and HPV genotype; 2 favored a preponderance of F-M and 1 favored M-F transmission. CONCLUSIONS: There was slight evidence for a differential transmission rate favoring higher F-M than M-F transmission with substantial statistical heterogeneity across studies.
Authors: Anna R Giuliano; Alan G Nyitray; Aimée R Kreimer; Christine M Pierce Campbell; Marc T Goodman; Staci L Sudenga; Joseph Monsonego; Silvia Franceschi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Anna R Giuliano; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Luisa L Villa; Roberto Flores; Jorge Salmeron; Ji-Hyun Lee; Mary R Papenfuss; Martha Abrahamsen; Emily Jolles; Carrie M Nielson; Maria Luisa Baggio; Roberto Silva; Manuel Quiterio Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brenda Y Hernandez; Lynne R Wilkens; Xuemei Zhu; Pamela Thompson; Katharine McDuffie; Yurii B Shvetsov; Lori E Kamemoto; Jeffrey Killeen; Lily Ning; Marc T Goodman Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Donna J Ingles; Hui-Yi Lin; William J Fulp; Staci L Sudenga; Beibei Lu; Matthew B Schabath; Mary R Papenfuss; Martha E Abrahamsen; Jorge Salmeron; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo Lazcano Ponce; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Papillomavirus Res Date: 2015-10-08
Authors: Talía Malagón; Aaron MacCosham; Ann N Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Pierre Paul Tellier; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Jacek Baj; Alicja Forma; Iga Dudek; Zuzanna Chilimoniuk; Maciej Dobosz; Michał Dobrzyński; Grzegorz Teresiński; Grzegorz Buszewicz; Jolanta Flieger; Piero Portincasa Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 6.575