Literature DB >> 32492213

Validation of PATHFx 2.0: An open-source tool for estimating survival in patients undergoing pathologic fracture fixation.

Archie L Overmann1, DesRaj M Clark1, Panagiotis Tsagkozis2, Rikard Wedin2, Jonathan A Forsberg1,2,3.   

Abstract

Treatment decisions in patients with metastatic bone disease rely on accurate survival estimation. We developed the original PATHFx models using expensive, proprietary software and now seek to provide a more cost-effective solution. Using open-source machine learning software to create PATHFx version 2.0, we asked whether PATHFx 2.0 could be created using open-source methods and externally validated in two unique patient populations. The training set of a well-characterized, database records of 189 patients and the bnlearn package within R Version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing), was used to establish a series of Bayesian belief network models designed to predict survival at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Each was externally validated in both a Scandinavian (n = 815 patients) and a Japanese (n = 261 patients) data set. Brier scores and receiver operating characteristic curves to assessed discriminatory ability. Decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated whether models should be used clinically. DCA showed that the model should be used clinically at all time points in the Scandinavian data set. For the 1-month time point, DCA of the Japanese data set suggested to expect better outcomes assuming all patients will survive greater than 1 month. Brier scores for each curve demonstrate that the models are accurate at each time point. Statement of Clinical Significance: we successfully transitioned to PATHFx 2.0 using open-source software and externally validated it in two unique patient populations, which can be used as a cost-effective option to guide surgical decisions in patients with metastatic bone disease.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; PATHFx; postoperative survival; prognostic model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32492213     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

Authors:  Punthitra Arpornsuksant; Carol D Morris; Jonathan A Forsberg; Adam S Levin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases among Orthopedic Surgeons.

Authors:  Dawid Ciechanowicz; Daniel Kotrych; Filip Dąbrowski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  The Prediction of Survival after Surgical Management of Bone Metastases of the Extremities-A Comparison of Prognostic Models.

Authors:  Ofir Ben Gal; Terrence Chi Fang Soh; Sarah Vaughan; Viswanath Jayasanker; Ashish Mahendra; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Can a Bayesian belief network for survival prediction in patients with extremity metastases (PATHFx) be externally validated in an Asian cohort of 356 surgically treated patients?

Authors:  Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh; Yi-Hsiang Lai; Chia-Che Lee; Hung-Kuan Yen; Ting-En Tseng; Jiun-Jen Yang; Shin-Yiing Ling; Ming-Hsiao Hu; Chun-Han Hou; Rong-Sen Yang; Rikard Wedin; Jonathan A Forsberg; Wei-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.925

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.