Literature DB >> 32491258

Corneal nerve loss in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy or microalbuminuria.

Hoda Gad1, Bara Al-Jarrah2, Saras Saraswathi2, Ioannis N Petropoulos1, Georgios Ponirakis1, Adnan Khan1, Parul Singh3, Souhaila Al Khodor3, Mamoun Elawad2, Wesam Almasri2, Hatim Abdelrahman2, Ahmed Elawwa4, Amel Khalifa4, Ahmed Shamekh4, Fawziya Al-Khalaf4, Goran Petrovski4, Mahmoud Al Zyoud4, Maryam Al Maadheed4, Mohamed A Hendaus5, Khalid Hussain4, Anthony K Akobeng2, Rayaz A Malik1,6.   

Abstract

AIMS/
INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy is a rapid, non-invasive ophthalmic technique to identify subclinical neuropathy. The aim of this study was to quantify corneal nerve morphology in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with age-matched healthy controls using corneal confocal microscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (age 14 ± 2 years, diabetes duration 4.08 ± 2.91 years, glycated hemoglobin 9.3 ± 2.1%) without retinopathy or microalbuminuria and 20 healthy controls were recruited from outpatient clinics. Corneal confocal microscopy was undertaken, and corneal nerve fiber density (n/mm2 ), corneal nerve branch density (n/mm2 ), corneal nerve fiber length (mm/mm2 ), corneal nerve fiber tortuosity and inferior whorl length (mm/mm2 ) were quantified manually.
RESULTS: Corneal nerve fiber density (22.73 ± 8.84 vs 32.92 ± 8.59; P < 0.001), corneal nerve branch density (26.19 ± 14.64 vs 47.34 ± 20.01; P < 0.001), corneal nerve fiber length (13.26 ± 4.06 vs 19.52 ± 4.54; P < 0.001) and inferior whorl length (15.50 ± 5.48 vs 23.42 ± 3.94; P < 0.0001) were significantly lower, whereas corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (14.88 ± 5.28 vs 13.52 ± 3.01; P = 0.323) did not differ between children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and controls. Glycated hemoglobin correlated with corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (P < 0.006) and aspartate aminotransferase correlated with corneal nerve fiber density (P = 0.039), corneal nerve branch density (P = 0.003) and corneal nerve fiber length (P = 0.037).
CONCLUSION: Corneal confocal microscopy identifies significant subclinical corneal nerve loss, especially in the inferior whorl of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy or microalbuminuria.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Small fiber neuropathy; Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32491258      PMCID: PMC7610109          DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Investig        ISSN: 2040-1116            Impact factor:   4.232


Introduction

Type 1 diabetes mellitus affects over half a million children worldwide , . Diabetes is associated with chronic microvascular complications in adults, which increase morbidity and all‐cause mortality . Diabetes is the main cause of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) , , . Adults with DSPN present with a combination of symptoms, such as numbness, pain and tingling in the feet . The American Diabetes Association endorses screening for DSPN at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, 5 years after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and annually thereafter . Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes rarely complain of neuropathic symptoms. However, a study of children with type 1 diabetes showed reduced motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (24%), and at least one neuropathic symptom (60%) or sign (58%) . In another study, symptomatic neuropathy was present in 13.5% of patients, whereas 22.5% of patients had neurophysiological evidence of neuropathy and 18% had impaired vibrotactile sense . Furthermore, in one study, 36% of patients had more than two abnormal autonomic function tests, and 18.8% had severe autonomic neuropathy . In a prospective study, abnormal nerve conduction velocity was found in 31.6% at baseline, which increased to 63.2% after 5 years . In another study, over a period of 10 years, the prevalence of clinical neuropathy increased from 6.5% to 16.1%, whereas nerve conduction velocity abnormalities increased from 17.7% to 46.8% . Although neurophysiological assessments are highly sensitive, they are not easily carried out in children . Vibration perception threshold and tactile perception threshold tests are easy to carry out, but lack sensitivity for the early detection of DSPN . There is a need for non‐invasive sensitive screening tools for the early detection of neuropathy in children with diabetes. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non‐invasive and well‐tolerated technique to detect and quantify neuropathy in adults with type 1 diabetes , , , , , , , . An early study found no significant changes in CCM parameters among children with type 1 diabetes . However, a more recent study has shown a significant reduction in corneal nerve fiber measures in young children with type 1 diabetes with and without diabetic retinopathy . The aim of the present study was to quantify corneal nerve morphology in the central cornea and inferior whorl of children with type 1 diabetes compared with age‐matched healthy controls using CCM.

Methods

A total of 20 participants with type 1 diabetes and 20 age‐matched healthy controls underwent CCM. Patients with a history of any other cause of neuropathy, malignancy, deficiency of vitamin B12 or folate, chronic renal failure, liver failure, connective tissue or systemic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, systemic scleroderma, Raynaud’s phenomenon), previous corneal trauma or systemic disease that affects the cornea, surgery and a history of or current contact lens wear were excluded from the study. All participants provided assent and parental informed consent. The research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by Sidra Medicine and the Weill Cornell Medicine Research Ethics Committee.

Image selection and quantification

Six central sub‐basal nerve plexus images were selected from the central cornea and corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD; n/mm2), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD; n/mm2), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL; mm/mm2) and corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (CNFT) were quantified using manual CCMetrics (The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK). Six images centered on the inferior whorl and adjacent areas (upper right/left corner and lower right/left corners) were selected, and the inferior whorl length (IWL) (mm/mm2) was quantified utilizing the manual CNFL mode in CCMetrics (Figure 1) . The investigator was blind to the study group when carrying out CCM and analyzing CCM images.
Figure 1

Central corneal sub‐basal nerve plexus and inferior whorl. (a) Schematic presentation of the sub‐basal nerve plexus (SBNP) at the central and inferior whorl. (b) Nerve fibers at the central cornea, (c) tracing of the nerves using CCMetrics, (d) nerve fibers at the inferior whorl and (e) tracing of the inferior whorl using CCMetrics.

Central corneal sub‐basal nerve plexus and inferior whorl. (a) Schematic presentation of the sub‐basal nerve plexus (SBNP) at the central and inferior whorl. (b) Nerve fibers at the central cornea, (c) tracing of the nerves using CCMetrics, (d) nerve fibers at the inferior whorl and (e) tracing of the inferior whorl using CCMetrics.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using IBM spss Statistics software version 26 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Normally distributed data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and the means were compared using an independent sample t‐test. Pearson’s correlation was undertaken to investigate the association between clinical parameters and corneal nerve fiber parameters. GraphPad Prism version 8 (La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to build the plots.

Results

A total of 20 participants with type 1 diabetes and 20 healthy controls underwent CCM. Participants with type 1 diabetes were slightly older (P < 0.02) and taller (P < 0.02), but had comparable weight and body mass index (BMI). They also had a lower aspartate aminotransferase (AST; P < 0.02), but comparable bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical and laboratory measures in patients with type 1 diabetes and controls

Healthy (n = 20)T1DM (n = 20) P‐value
Age (years)12.83 ± 1.9114.47 ± 2.43 0.02
Duration of T1DM4.08 ± 2.91NA
Height (m)1.45 ± 0.131.54 ± 0.09 0.02
Weight (kg)47.87 ± 18.6351.65 ± 13.460.467
BMI (kg/m2)22.26 ± 5.4721.68 ± 5.090.733
HbA1c (%)9.3 ± 2.1NA
Bilirubin (μmol/L)10.54 ± 5.413.22 ± 5.920.206
AST (IU/L)24.83 ± 5.4520.44 ± 4.23 0.02
ALT (IU/L)15.08 ± 4.0316.44 ± 3.740.339
25(OH)D (ng/mL)23.88 ± 8.9618.16 ± 8.560.085
Microalbuminuria, n (%)
Yes0NA
No11 (55.0%)
Diabetic retinopathy, n (%)
Yes0NA
No8 (40.0%)

Bold signifies the statistically significant comparisons. Data are presented as mean ± SD. 25(OH)D, 250hydroxy vitamin D; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c , glycated hemoglobin; NA, not available; T1DM, type 1 diabetes.

Clinical and laboratory measures in patients with type 1 diabetes and controls Bold signifies the statistically significant comparisons. Data are presented as mean ± SD. 25(OH)D, 250hydroxy vitamin D; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c , glycated hemoglobin; NA, not available; T1DM, type 1 diabetes. Just four (20%) of the patients met the American Diabetes Association criteria (aged >10 years and >5 years of diabetes) to undergo screening for microvascular complications. Eight (40.0%) underwent assessment for retinopathy, and 11 (55.0%) underwent assessment for microalbuminuria, of whom none had retinopathy or microalbuminuria. CNFD (22.73 ± 8.84 vs 32.92 ± 8.59; P = 0.001), CNBD (26.19 ± 14.64 vs 47.34 ± 20.01; P < 0.001) and CNFL (13.26 ± 4.06 vs 19.52 ± 4.54; P < 0.001) were lower in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with healthy controls (Figure 2a–c). CNFT did not differ between groups (14.88 ± 5.28 vs 13.52 ± 3.01; P = 0.323; Figure 3d). IWL was significantly lower in patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 19) compared with controls (n = 19; 15.50 ± 5.48 vs 23.42 ± 3.94; P < 0.0001; Figure 3a–c). CNFD, CNBD, CNFL and IWL were more than two standard deviations lower than the mean of controls in 15, 10, 30 and 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes.
Figure 2

Corneal confocal microscopy parameters and images of the sub‐basal plexus in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and healthy controls. (a) Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), (b) corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), (c) corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), (d) corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (CNFT) and (e) corneal confocal microscopy image of corneal nerves in a healthy control. (f) Corneal confocal microscopy image of reduced corneal nerves in a child with type 1 diabetes.

Figure 3

Inferior whorl length and corneal confocal microscopy images of the inferior whorl in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and healthy controls. (a) Inferior whorl length (IWL) in healthy controls and children with type 1 diabetes, (b) corneal confocal microscopy image of IWL in a healthy control and (c) corneal confocal microscopy image of IWL in a child with type 1 diabetes.

Corneal confocal microscopy parameters and images of the sub‐basal plexus in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and healthy controls. (a) Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), (b) corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), (c) corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), (d) corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (CNFT) and (e) corneal confocal microscopy image of corneal nerves in a healthy control. (f) Corneal confocal microscopy image of reduced corneal nerves in a child with type 1 diabetes. Inferior whorl length and corneal confocal microscopy images of the inferior whorl in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and healthy controls. (a) Inferior whorl length (IWL) in healthy controls and children with type 1 diabetes, (b) corneal confocal microscopy image of IWL in a healthy control and (c) corneal confocal microscopy image of IWL in a child with type 1 diabetes.

Correlation between CCM parameters and clinical/laboratory measures

Age, height, BMI, 25‐hydroxy vitamin D, bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase did not correlate with any CCM parameter (P > 0.05). There was no correlation between duration of diabetes and CCM parameters (P > 0.05), and only glycated hemoglobin correlated significantly with CNFT (P < 0.006). AST correlated with BMI (P < 0.01), CNFD (P = 0.039), CNBD (P = 0.003) and CNFL (P = 0.037; Table 2).
Table 2

Correlations between corneal confocal microscopy parameters and clinical and metabolic parameters

Age (years)Duration of disease (years)HbA1c (%)

Height

(m)

BMI (kg/m2)25(OH)D (ng/mL)Bilirubin (μmol/L)AST (IU/L)ALT (IU/L)
CNFD (n/mm2)−0.278 (0.235)0.027 (0.915)−0.300 (0.226)−0.028 (0.907)−0.396 (0.084)0.072 (0.783)−0.207 (0.41)0.489 (0.039) −0.121 (0.633)
CNBD (n/mm2)−0.144 (0.544)0.108 (0.670)0.221 (0.377)0.040 (0.876)−0.329 (0.157)−0.002 (0.995)0.033 (0.897)0.666 (0.003) 0.129 (0.611)
CNFL (mm/mm2)−0.188 (0.428)0.067 (0.791)−0.036 (0.887)0.053 (0.824)−0.257 (0.275)−0.099 (0.706)−0.127 (0.615)0.495 (0.037) −0.013 (0.959)
CNFT (TC)0.28 (0.231)0.032 (0.899)0.619 (0.006) 0.202 (0.392)0.203 (0.39)0.244 (0.344)0.267 (0.284)−0.165 (0.505)−0.282 (0.256)
IWL (mm/mm2)0.195 (0.423)0.029 (0.911)−0.009 (0.974)0.063 (0.798)0.358 (0.133)−0.380 (0.132)−0.456 (0.066)0.014 (0.957)−0.001 (0.995)

Bold signifies the statistically significant comparisons. 25(OH)D, 25‐hydroxy vitamin D; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFD, corneal nerve fiber density; CNFL, corneal nerve fiber length; CNFT, corneal nerve fiber tortuosity; HbA1c , glycated hemoglobin; IWL, inferior whorl length; TC, tortuosity coefficient.

Correlations between corneal confocal microscopy parameters and clinical and metabolic parameters Height (m) Bold signifies the statistically significant comparisons. 25(OH)D, 25‐hydroxy vitamin D; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFD, corneal nerve fiber density; CNFL, corneal nerve fiber length; CNFT, corneal nerve fiber tortuosity; HbA1c , glycated hemoglobin; IWL, inferior whorl length; TC, tortuosity coefficient.

Discussion

In the present study, there was evidence of significant corneal nerve loss in children with type 1 diabetes without retinopathy or microalbuminuria. It is critical to detect and prevent nerve damage at the earliest stage of diabetic neuropathy, as improvement in glycemic control and other risk factors, such as obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia, might prevent nerve degeneration and promote nerve regeneration , . Previous studies of adults with type 1 diabetes have found a significant reduction in central CNFD, CNBD and CNFL compared with healthy controls , , , , , , , and in type 1 diabetes patients without retinopathy or microalbuminuria . Corneal nerve loss has good diagnostic utility for both diabetic somatic and autonomic neuropathy . Furthermore, a lower CNFL is associated with the development of clinical diabetic neuropathy , , , and a more rapid reduction in CNFL predicts the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy . Significant improvements in CNFD, CNBD and CNFL have been observed in type 1 diabetes patients after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation , , omega‐3 supplementation , and an improvement in multiple risk factors for diabetic neuropathy . In the present study, a significant reduction in central corneal nerve fiber parameters in young children with type 1 diabetes has been shown, which is comparable to a previous study of children and young adolescents with type 1 diabetes . Established risk factors for diabetic neuropathy, such as age, height, glycated hemoglobin and BMI, were not associated with the reduction in corneal nerve parameters, consistent with previous findings in adults with type 1 diabetes , . CNFT was not altered, in contrast with a study of adults with diabetes where nerve tortuosity was higher . A reduction in corneal nerves occurs, regardless of diabetes duration, in young patients with type 1 diabetes and adults with type 2 diabetes . The American Diabetes Association has recommended initial screening for albuminuria and retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes aged >10 years, after 3–5 years of diabetes . Although 20% of this cohort fulfilled the criteria for screening, none had microalbuminuria or retinopathy. Indeed, the significant corneal nerve loss in these children with type 1 diabetes without retinopathy or microalbuminuria agrees with previous findings in adults with type 1 diabetes , , and supports the thesis that neuropathy might precede retinopathy . It also argues for earlier screening of diabetic neuropathy in children with type 1 diabetes using CCM. AST was lower in the present cohort with type 1 diabetes, and correlated with CNFD, CNBD and CNFL. No relationship between AST and CCM has been observed in studies in adults with diabetes , , , . Although the association between BMI and elevated AST is well established as a marker for liver injury in obese adults , , , , in the present study, AST was inversely correlated with BMI. The inferior whorl is distal to the central nerves, and might allow the identification of earlier nerve damage , . Studies of adults with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes have shown a greater reduction in IWL , , especially in those with painful diabetic neuropathy , . This is the first study of children with type 1 diabetes showing a marked reduction in IWL, with 50% having a reduction greater than two standard deviations lower than the mean in controls. A limitation of the current study was the cross‐sectional design, relatively small number of participants studied and the lack of additional measures of diabetic neuropathy. Prospective studies are required to assess progression of corneal nerve abnormalities in relation to other complications and risk factors for diabetic neuropathy. Significant corneal nerve loss has been shown in the central cornea and inferior whorl indicative of neuropathy in children with type 1 diabetes without microalbuminuria or retinopathy. This suggests that CCM could be used to screen for early subclinical neuropathy and to assess disease progression in children with type 1 diabetes.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  56 in total

1.  Corneal confocal microscopy best identifies the development and progression of neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Katie Edwards; Nicola Pritchard; Cirous Dehghani; Dimitrios Vagenas; Anthony Russell; Rayaz A Malik; Nathan Efron
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 2.  Evaluation and Care of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Lee M Jampol; Adam R Glassman; Jennifer Sun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Body mass index and liver enzyme activity in serum.

Authors:  A Salvaggio; M Periti; L Miano; M Tavanelli; D Marzorati
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Cardiac autonomic function in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Kotb Abbass Metwalley; Sherifa Ahmed Hamed; Hekma Saad Farghaly
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Diagnostic work-up in peripheral neuropathy: an analysis of 171 cases.

Authors:  D Lubec; W Müllbacher; J Finsterer; B Mamoli
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Corneal confocal microscopy predicts 4-year incident peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Nicola Pritchard; Katie Edwards; Anthony W Russell; Bruce A Perkins; Rayaz A Malik; Nathan Efron
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Uazman Alam; Maria Jeziorska; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Omar Asghar; Hassan Fadavi; Georgios Ponirakis; Andrew Marshall; Mitra Tavakoli; Andrew J M Boulton; Nathan Efron; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impaired vibrotactile sense in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes - Signs of peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Erik Ising; Lars B Dahlin; Helena Elding Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Greater corneal nerve loss at the inferior whorl is related to the presence of diabetic neuropathy and painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Alise Kalteniece; Maryam Ferdousi; Ioannis Petropoulos; Shazli Azmi; Safwaan Adam; Hassan Fadavi; Andrew Marshall; Andrew J M Boulton; Nathan Efron; Catharina G Faber; Giuseppe Lauria; Handrean Soran; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Diabetic Neuropathy: New Insights to Early Diagnosis and Treatments.

Authors:  Mark Yorek; Rayaz A Malik; Nigel A Calcutt; Aaron Vinik; Soroku Yagihashi
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.011

View more
  7 in total

1.  Distinctive Microbial Signatures and Gut-Brain Crosstalk in Pediatric Patients with Coeliac Disease and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Parul Singh; Arun Rawat; Bara Al-Jarrah; Saras Saraswathi; Hoda Gad; Mamoun Elawad; Khalid Hussain; Mohammed A. Hendaus; Wesam Al-Masri; Rayaz A Malik; Souhaila Al Khodor; Anthony K Akobeng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy to Image Small Nerve Fiber Degeneration: Ophthalmology Meets Neurology.

Authors:  Ioannis N Petropoulos; Gulfidan Bitirgen; Maryam Ferdousi; Alise Kalteniece; Shazli Azmi; Luca D'Onofrio; Sze Hway Lim; Georgios Ponirakis; Adnan Khan; Hoda Gad; Ibrahim Mohammed; Yacob E Mohammadi; Ayesha Malik; David Gosal; Christopher Kobylecki; Monty Silverdale; Handrean Soran; Uazman Alam; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 3.  Diabetic corneal neuropathy as a surrogate marker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Wei Zheng So; Natalie Shi Qi Wong; Hong Chang Tan; Molly Tzu Yu Lin; Isabelle Xin Yu Lee; Jodhbir S Mehta; Yu-Chi Liu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 6.058

Review 4.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review.

Authors:  Eleonora Cosmo; Giulia Midena; Luisa Frizziero; Marisa Bruno; Michela Cecere; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy in type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Meijian Wang; Cong Zhang; Anju Zuo; Lili Li; Li Chen; Xinguo Hou
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.232

6.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Rayaz A Malik; Nathan Efron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hoda Gad; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Adnan Khan; Georgios Ponirakis; Ross MacDonald; Uazman Alam; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.232

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.