Literature DB >> 32490042

Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire-Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Pain-related Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Samuel U Jumbo1, Joy C MacDermid1,2, Michael E Kalu3, Tara L Packham3, George S Athwal2, Kenneth J Faber2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) are generic pain assessment tools used in research and practice for pain assessment in musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. A comprehensive review that systematically analyses their measurement properties in MSK conditions has not been performed. This review protocol describes the steps that will be taken to locate, critically appraise, compare and summarize clinical measurement research on the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in pain-related MSK conditions.
METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus will be searched for publications that examine the measurement properties of the Brief Pain Inventory and Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2. Two reviewers will independently screen citations (title, abstract and full text) and extract relevant data. The extensiveness, rigor, and quality of measurement property reports will be examined with a structured measurement studies appraisal tool, and with the updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Findings will be descriptively summarized, and when possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This review will summarize and compare the current level of evidence on the measurement properties of the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in a spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions. We expect clinicians/researchers dealing with MSK conditions to have synthesized evidence that informs their decision making and preferences. In addition, the review hopes to identify gaps and determine priorities for future research with or on the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in MSK conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brief pain inventory; McGill pain questionnaire; Musculoskeletal conditions; Patient reported outcomes; Psychometrics properties; Systematic review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32490042      PMCID: PMC7191979          DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2020.36779.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jens R Chapman; Daniel C Norvell; Jeffrey T Hermsmeyer; Richard J Bransford; John DeVine; Matthew J McGirt; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments to Assess Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Abhilasha Ramasamy; Mona L Martin; Steven I Blum; Hiltrud Liedgens; Charles Argoff; Rainer Freynhagen; Mark Wallace; Kelly P McCarrier; Donald M Bushnell; Noël V Hatley; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 4.  A systematic review of the measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.

Authors:  Saurabh P Mehta; Joy C MacDermid; Julie Richardson; Norma J MacIntyre; Ruby Grewal
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  C A C Prinsen; L B Mokkink; L M Bouter; J Alonso; D L Patrick; H C W de Vet; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  L B Mokkink; H C W de Vet; C A C Prinsen; D L Patrick; J Alonso; L M Bouter; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2).

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Dennis A Revicki; Gale Harding; Karin S Coyne; Sarah Peirce-Sandner; Dileep Bhagwat; Dennis Everton; Laurie B Burke; Penney Cowan; John T Farrar; Sharon Hertz; Mitchell B Max; Bob A Rappaport; Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; K M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 9.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 202.731

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Regression Modeling of Individual-Patient Correlated Discrete Outcomes with Applications to Cancer Pain Ratings.

Authors:  George J Knafl; Salimah H Meghani
Journal:  Open J Stat       Date:  2022-08-11

2.  Reproducibility: reliability and agreement parameters of the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 for use in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain.

Authors:  Samuel U Jumbo; Joy C MacDermid; Tara L Packham; George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.