| Literature DB >> 32489767 |
Kenji Kinashi1, Hayato Tsuchida2, Wataru Sakai1, Naoto Tsutsumi1.
Abstract
The theoretical limit of the color-change sensitivity of a composite <span class="Chemical">resin dosimeter film based on <span class="Chemical">6-nitro BIPS/BaFCl : Eu2+/polystyrene under X-ray exposure has been estimated. Each photophysical and photochemical process occurring inside the composite resin dosimeter was quantitatively determined, and the obtained values were used to estimate the theoretical limit of the color-change sensitivity for the composite resin dosimeter. The values obtained were 70.6 % for the X-ray absorption efficiency, 13 % for the fluorescence quantum yield, 73.5 % for the UV absorption efficiency and 37.6 % for the photochemical quantum yield. Assuming that the figure-of-merit is their product, its value is estimated to be 2.5 %, which contributes to the chromaticity difference and leads to a color-change sensitivity of 100 mGy. The figure-of-merit of a structurally optimized composite dosimeter was estimated to be 1.9 times that of the dosimeter without structural optimization, which showed a sensitivity of 100 mGy. We predicted that the structurally optimized composite resin dosimeter film, which eliminates optical losses due to the structure, will be able to detect X-ray exposure doses on the order of approximately 28 mGy.Entities:
Keywords: Color dosimeters; Composite resin dosimeter; photochromism; radioactivity; spiropyrans
Year: 2020 PMID: 32489767 PMCID: PMC7253063 DOI: 10.1002/open.202000071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1Reversible photochromic reaction of 6‐nitro BIPS in the composite resin dosimeter film. Schematic representation for the mechanism of the composite resin dosimeter film based on the 6‐nitro BIPS/BaFCl : Eu2+/PS. The mechanism for visualizing X‐ray exposure is divided into three steps: (left) X‐ray absorption, (center) UV emission, (right) color change (UV absorption, and the photochemical reaction).
Figure 2Time evolution of the absorbed dose of the Fricke solution for the composite resin dosimeter film (i) before and (ii) after X‐ray transmission. X‐ray absorption efficiency as a function of film thickness for the composite resin dosimeter film with a linear attenuation coefficient μ of 25.2 cm−1.
Figure 3(a) Absorption spectrum (orange curve) of the 6‐nitro BIPS in the PS film (acceptor) and X‐ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) spectrum (purple curve) of the BaFCl : Eu2+ powder (donor). The FRET spectral overlap integral J is located between the absorption spectrum of the acceptor and the XEOL spectrum of the donor. (b) Changes in the XEOL spectral intensity with changes in the 6‐nitro BIPS concentration in the presence of a fixed concentration of BaFCl : Eu2+ powder (1.5 g) in the PS film (3.5 g). The inset shows the XEOL intensity at 381 nm as a function of the 6‐nitro BIPS concentration.
Figure 4(a) Dynamic intensity of the 405 nm pump beam transmitted through the PS film containing 6‐nitro BIPS for 1 s, excluding the opening and closing of the mechanical shutter. (b) Transmittance spectral changes of the 6‐nitro BIPS containing PS film before and after irradiation with 405 nm light. A 6‐nitro BIPS concentration of 5.19×10−3 M in the PS film (film thickness 181 μm) corresponds to the photochemical quantum yield measurement. A 6‐nitro BIPS concentration of 5.03×10−3 M in the PS film (film thickness 167 μm) corresponds to the molar extinction coefficient measurement.
Figure 5(a) Dose response curves for the composite resin dosimeter films with (solid blue line) and without (solid black line) structural optimization. (b) Enlarged view of the gray‐shaded mask region in Figure 5(a). The color‐gradient bar indicates the color tone corresponding to ΔE. The dotted black line indicates the point at which the color change can be visually observed.
Measured and calculated photophysical and photochemical parameters of the 6‐nitro BIPS/BaFCl : Eu2+/PS film.
|
Parameter |
Value |
|---|---|
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
37.6 |
|
FOMX‐to‐P (%)b |
2.5 |
|
|
100 |
[a] A. L. N. Stevels et al., Philips Res. Repts., 30, 277, 1975. [b] FOMX‐P=A X Φ D A UV Φ P. [c] H. Tsuchida et al., New J. Chem., 40, 8658, 2016.