| Literature DB >> 32489293 |
Mnif Fakhfakh Lobna1, Jeddi Kaouthar1, Anjum A Naser2, Mohamed Chaieb1.
Abstract
A process of continuous degradation of plant communities, due mainly to long-term overgrazing has been revealed by most ecological studies in North African arid climate. Notably, this degradation appeared across the depletion of perennial grass species exhibiting low density in the majority of range ecosystems. This study aimed to examine the phenology and the aboveground phytomass production of Stipagrostis ciliata (Desf.) De Winter accessions, a perennial grass, growing under the same environment but coming from different climates of Tunisia. Additionally, the extent of genetic variation in phenological parameters, root and shoot phytomass productivity and the correlations among these parameters were also analyzed. Significant differences in all morphological parameters of S. ciliata accessions were revealed by ANOVA test and were corroborated with significant and positive correlation indicated by Pearson's correlation analysis. Plant diameter, biovolume, root biomass with protective sleeve and spike number exhibited significant differences and high distinctiveness between S. ciliata accessions. Tukey's HDS tests indicated the presence of three groups of accessions. Principal component analysis (PCA) applied on a table with eight observations and 13 variables, and dispersion of S. ciliata accessions on the first two axes of PCA confirmed the presence of three groups of accessions. Trait variability in the field for the five accessions is more likely to be the result of phenotypic plasticity rather than of genetic differentiation between accessions. Overall, the characterization of S. ciliata accessions exhibited significant differences in terms of morphological and biomass productivity.Entities:
Keywords: Accession; Arid zone; Morphological characters; Phenology; Stipagrostis ciliata
Year: 2020 PMID: 32489293 PMCID: PMC7253882 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Biological and ecological characteristic of Stipagrostis ciliata (Desf.) De Winter.
| Item | Botanical and ecological characteristic | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Family | ||
| Life cycle | Perennial | |
| Biological type | Hemicryptophyte | |
| Photosynthetic pathway | C4 | |
| Optimal temperature of germination | 25 °C | |
| Soil type preferendum | Gypsohalocline | |
| Biogeographical repartition | - North Africa | Hosney et al. (2009) |
| Ecological interest | - Indicators species for good pastoral area | |
| Appetability | -Is one of best forages grasses | |
| Caryotype | x = 11 | |
| Weight of 1000 seeds | 2.9 gr | |
| Reproduction | Facultatively cleistogamous |
Geographical location of the studied sites of Stipagrostis ciliata accessions and their ecological characteristics for the study year 2013/2014.
| Name of site of observation | Geographical characteristics | Bioclimatic characteristics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accession code | GPS coordinates | Bioclimate type (Emberger 1954) | Annual Precipitation (mm) | M (°C) | M (°C) | Soil type | ||
| Bou Hedma | BH | 34° 27′ N | 09° 39′ E | Wet Arid | 220 | 36.2 | 3.8 | Sandy soil |
| Matmata | MA | 33° 53 ’ N | 10° 01′ E | Wet Arid | 177 | 35.4 | 4.2 | Loam soil |
| Sfax | SF | 34° 73′ N | 10° 63′ E | Wet Arid | 210 | 31.5 | 6.5 | Sandy soil |
| Gabes | GA | 34° 10′ N | 09° 59′ E | Dry Arid | 165 | 33 | 6.1 | Sandy soil |
| Bir Ali ben Khalifa | BK | 34° 45′ N | 10°13′ E | Dry Arid | 191 | 35 | 7 | Sandy soil |
Surveyed morphological and productivity parameters of studied Stipagrostis ciliata accessions.
| Number | Parameters | Code of parameters | Unit of measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuft length | PL | cm |
| 2 | Tuft diameter | PD | cm |
| 3 | Tuft biovolume | BV | cm3 |
| 4 | Tiller number | TN | Numb. |
| 5 | Tuft spike number | SpN | Numb. |
| 6 | Tuft seed number | SeN | Numb. |
| 7 | Tuft leaf number | LeaN | Numb. |
| 8 | Aboveground biomass | AgB | gr DM |
| 9 | Root biomass with protective sleeves | RootB1 | gr DM |
| 10 | Root biomass | RootB2 | gr DM |
| 11 | Plant total weight | PtW | gr DM |
| 12 | Harvest index | HI | % |
| 13 | Rain use efficiency | RUE | gr DM m−2 mm−1 |
Fig. 1Shoot dry matter accumulation per each tuft for five Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Variation of root dry matter between the different studied accessions.
| Accession | Root dry matter with protective sleeves | Root dry matter |
|---|---|---|
| BH | 63.55 ± 12 | 16 ± 3.25 |
| MA | 25.32 ± 8 | 11.75 ± 3 |
| SF | 44.44 ± 8.23 | 13.87 ± 2.5 |
| GA | 28.12 ± 5.23 | 13.25 ± 2.87 |
| BK | 40.36 ± 10 | 13.71 ± 3 |
| 6.527 | 1.417 | |
| 0.003 | 0.276 |
Fig. 2Root /shoot dry matter ratio for Stipagrostis ciliata during the growth cycle.
Fig. 3Variation of spike number/tuft between Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8). Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Summary of the variance analysis for morphological and productivity parameters.
| N° | Parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuft length | 4.311 | 0.016 | |
| 2 | Tuft diameter | 8.044 | 0.001 | |
| 3 | Tuft biovolume | 6.679 | 0.003 | |
| 4 | Tiller number | 4.842 | 0.010 | |
| 5 | Tuft spike number | 6.526 | 0.003 | |
| 6 | Tuft seed number | 2.209 | 0.117 | |
| 7 | Tuft leaf number | 2.986 | 0.053 | |
| 8 | Aboveground biomass | 3.350 | 0.038 | |
| 9 | Root biomass with protective sleeve | 6.527 | 0.003 | |
| 10 | Root biomass | 1.417 | 0.276 | |
| 11 | Plant total weight | 3.553 | 0.031 | |
| 12 | Harvest index | 2.515 | 0.085 | |
| 13 | RUE | 4.123 | 0.001 |
n = 8, significant differences p = 0.05.
Fig. 4Variation of mean leaf number/tuft between Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8). Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Pearson‘s correlation coefficients of morphological characteristics.
| PL | PD | BV | TN | SpN | SeN | AgB | RootB1 | RootB2 | PtW | LeaN | HI | RUE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | 1 | ||||||||||||
| PD | 0.790** | 1 | |||||||||||
| BV | 0.768** | 0.903** | 1 | ||||||||||
| TN | 0.764** | 0.722** | 0.864** | 1 | |||||||||
| SpN | 0.803** | 0.778** | 0.871** | 0.790** | 1 | ||||||||
| SeN | 0.491* | 0.290 | 0.345 | 0.409 | 0.585* | 1 | |||||||
| AgB | 0.456* | 0.444* | 0.416 | 0.340 | 0.562** | 0.499* | 1 | ||||||
| RootB1 | 0.456* | 0.496* | 0.395 | 0.274 | 0.535* | 0.531* | 0.844** | 1 | |||||
| RootB2 | 0.466* | 0.475* | 0.463* | 0.448* | 0.533* | 0.382 | 0.480* | 0.622** | 1 | ||||
| PtW | 0.466* | 0.464* | 0.422 | 0.336 | 0.570** | 0.516* | 0.995** | 0.892** | 0.517* | 1 | |||
| LeaN | 0.606** | 0.569** | 0.760** | 0.838** | 0.557* | 0.146 | 0.080 | −0.055 | 0.141 | 0.058 | 1 | ||
| HI | 0.457* | 0.400 | 0.410 | 0.390 | 0.380 | 0.105 | 0.449 | 0.006 | −0.018 | 0.380 | 0.450* | 1 | |
| RUE | 0.406 | 0.443 | 0.439 | 0.328 | 0.582 | 0.509 | 0979 | 0.808 | 0.464 | 0.968 | 0.150 | 0.355 | 1 |
* and **, significance at p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Correlation co-efficient between the first three principal components and the aboveground phytomass and morphological characters.
| Character | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative contribution | 55.08% | 74% | 82.7% |
| PL | 0.791 | ||
| PD | 0.811 | ||
| BV | 0.872 | ||
| TN | 0.786 | ||
| SpN | 0.923 | ||
| SeN | 0.584 | 0.391 | 0.052 |
| AgB | 0.784 | 0.461 | 0.360 |
| RtB1 | 0.707 | 0.667 | |
| RtB2 | 0.669 | 0.250 | |
| PtW | 0.787 | 0.509 | 0.293 |
| LeN | 0.637 | ||
| HI | 0.363 | 0.743 | |
| RUE | 0.587 | 0.499 | 0.421 |
Fig. 5Dispersion of observed variables in the first two axes of the principal component analyses.
Fig. 6Dispersion of Stipagrostis ciliata accessions on the first two axes of principal component analyses.