| Literature DB >> 32489293 |
Mnif Fakhfakh Lobna1, Jeddi Kaouthar1, Anjum A Naser2, Mohamed Chaieb1.
Abstract
A process of continuous degradation of plant communities, due mainly to long-term overgrazing has been revealed by most ecological studies in North African arid climate. Notably, this degradation appeared across the depn>letion of perennial grass spn>ecies exEntities:
Keywords: Accession; Arid zone; Morphological characters; Phenology; Stipagrostis ciliata
Year: 2020 PMID: 32489293 PMCID: PMC7253882 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Biological and ecological characteristic of Stipagrostis ciliata (Desf.) De Winter.
| Item | Botanical and ecological characteristic | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Family | ||
| Life cycle | Perennial | |
| Biological type | Hemicryptophyte | |
| Photosynthetic pathway | C4 | |
| Optimal temperature of germination | 25 °C | |
| Soil type preferendum | Gypsohalocline | |
| Biogeographical repartition | - North Africa | Hosney et al. (2009) |
| Ecological interest | - Indicators species for good pastoral area | |
| Appetability | -Is one of best forages grasses | |
| Caryotype | x = 11 | |
| Weight of 1000 seeds | 2.9 gr | |
| Reproduction | Facultatively cleistogamous |
Geographical location of the studied sites of Stipagrostis ciliata accessions and their ecological characteristics for the study year 2013/2014.
| Name of site of observation | Geographical characteristics | Bioclimatic characteristics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accession code | GPS coordinates | Bioclimate type (Emberger 1954) | Annual Precipitation (mm) | M (°C) | M (°C) | Soil type | ||
| Bou Hedma | BH | 34° 27′ N | 09° 39′ E | Wet Arid | 220 | 36.2 | 3.8 | Sandy soil |
| Matmata | MA | 33° 53 ’ N | 10° 01′ E | Wet Arid | 177 | 35.4 | 4.2 | Loam soil |
| Sfax | SF | 34° 73′ N | 10° 63′ E | Wet Arid | 210 | 31.5 | 6.5 | Sandy soil |
| Gabes | GA | 34° 10′ N | 09° 59′ E | Dry Arid | 165 | 33 | 6.1 | Sandy soil |
| Bir Ali ben Khalifa | BK | 34° 45′ N | 10°13′ E | Dry Arid | 191 | 35 | 7 | Sandy soil |
Surveyed morphological and productivity parameters of studied Stipagrostis ciliata accessions.
| Number | Parameters | Code of parameters | Unit of measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuft length | PL | cm |
| 2 | Tuft diameter | PD | cm |
| 3 | Tuft biovolume | BV | cm3 |
| 4 | Tiller number | TN | Numb. |
| 5 | Tuft spike number | SpN | Numb. |
| 6 | Tuft seed number | SeN | Numb. |
| 7 | Tuft leaf number | LeaN | Numb. |
| 8 | Aboveground biomass | AgB | gr DM |
| 9 | Root biomass with protective sleeves | RootB1 | gr DM |
| 10 | Root biomass | RootB2 | gr DM |
| 11 | Plant total weight | PtW | gr DM |
| 12 | Harvest index | HI | % |
| 13 | Rain use efficiency | RUE | gr DM m−2 mm−1 |
Fig. 1Shoot dry matter accumulation per each tuft for five Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Variation of root dry matter between the different studied accessions.
| Accession | Root dry matter with protective sleeves | Root dry matter |
|---|---|---|
| BH | 63.55 ± 12 | 16 ± 3.25 |
| MA | 25.32 ± 8 | 11.75 ± 3 |
| SF | 44.44 ± 8.23 | 13.87 ± 2.5 |
| GA | 28.12 ± 5.23 | 13.25 ± 2.87 |
| BK | 40.36 ± 10 | 13.71 ± 3 |
| 6.527 | 1.417 | |
| 0.003 | 0.276 |
Fig. 2Root /shoot dry matter ratio for Stipagrostis ciliata during the growth cycle.
Fig. 3Variation of spike number/tuft between Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8). Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Summary of the variance analysis for morphological and productivity parameters.
| N° | Parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuft length | 4.311 | 0.016 | |
| 2 | Tuft diameter | 8.044 | 0.001 | |
| 3 | Tuft biovolume | 6.679 | 0.003 | |
| 4 | Tiller number | 4.842 | 0.010 | |
| 5 | Tuft spike number | 6.526 | 0.003 | |
| 6 | Tuft seed number | 2.209 | 0.117 | |
| 7 | Tuft leaf number | 2.986 | 0.053 | |
| 8 | Aboveground biomass | 3.350 | 0.038 | |
| 9 | Root biomass with protective sleeve | 6.527 | 0.003 | |
| 10 | Root biomass | 1.417 | 0.276 | |
| 11 | Plant total weight | 3.553 | 0.031 | |
| 12 | Harvest index | 2.515 | 0.085 | |
| 13 | RUE | 4.123 | 0.001 |
n = 8, significant differences p = 0.05.
Fig. 4Variation of mean leaf number/tuft between Stipagrostis ciliata accessions. Bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8). Bars with Different letters are significantly different within accessions (Tukey’s HDS test P < 0.05).
Pearson‘s correlation coefficients of morphological characteristics.
| PL | PD | BV | TN | SpN | SeN | AgB | RootB1 | RootB2 | PtW | LeaN | HI | RUE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | 1 | ||||||||||||
| PD | 0.790** | 1 | |||||||||||
| BV | 0.768** | 0.903** | 1 | ||||||||||
| TN | 0.764** | 0.722** | 0.864** | 1 | |||||||||
| SpN | 0.803** | 0.778** | 0.871** | 0.790** | 1 | ||||||||
| SeN | 0.491* | 0.290 | 0.345 | 0.409 | 0.585* | 1 | |||||||
| AgB | 0.456* | 0.444* | 0.416 | 0.340 | 0.562** | 0.499* | 1 | ||||||
| RootB1 | 0.456* | 0.496* | 0.395 | 0.274 | 0.535* | 0.531* | 0.844** | 1 | |||||
| RootB2 | 0.466* | 0.475* | 0.463* | 0.448* | 0.533* | 0.382 | 0.480* | 0.622** | 1 | ||||
| PtW | 0.466* | 0.464* | 0.422 | 0.336 | 0.570** | 0.516* | 0.995** | 0.892** | 0.517* | 1 | |||
| LeaN | 0.606** | 0.569** | 0.760** | 0.838** | 0.557* | 0.146 | 0.080 | −0.055 | 0.141 | 0.058 | 1 | ||
| HI | 0.457* | 0.400 | 0.410 | 0.390 | 0.380 | 0.105 | 0.449 | 0.006 | −0.018 | 0.380 | 0.450* | 1 | |
| RUE | 0.406 | 0.443 | 0.439 | 0.328 | 0.582 | 0.509 | 0979 | 0.808 | 0.464 | 0.968 | 0.150 | 0.355 | 1 |
* and **, significance at p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively.
Correlation co-efficient between the first three principal components and the aboveground phytomass and morphological characters.
| Character | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative contribution | 55.08% | 74% | 82.7% |
| PL | 0.791 | ||
| PD | 0.811 | ||
| BV | 0.872 | ||
| TN | 0.786 | ||
| SpN | 0.923 | ||
| SeN | 0.584 | 0.391 | 0.052 |
| AgB | 0.784 | 0.461 | 0.360 |
| RtB1 | 0.707 | 0.667 | |
| RtB2 | 0.669 | 0.250 | |
| PtW | 0.787 | 0.509 | 0.293 |
| LeN | 0.637 | ||
| HI | 0.363 | 0.743 | |
| RUE | 0.587 | 0.499 | 0.421 |
Fig. 5Dispersion of observed variables in the first two axes of the principal component analyses.
Fig. 6Dispersion of Stipagrostis ciliata accessions on the first two axes of principal component analyses.