Literature DB >> 32489288

Identification and culturing of cyanobacteria isolated from freshwater bodies of Sri Lanka for biodiesel production.

Md Fuad Hossain1,2,3, R R Ratnayake2, Shamim Mahbub4, K L Wasantha Kumara3, D N Magana-Arachchi2.   

Abstract

The present study was carried out to investigate cyanobacteria as a potential source for biodiesel production isolated from fresh water bodies of Sri Lanpan>ka. Semi mass culturinpan>g anpan>d mass culturinpan>g were carried out to obtainpan> biomass for extractinpan>g total pan> class="Chemical">lipids. Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) or biodiesel was produced from extracted lipid by trans-esterification reaction. FAME component was identified using gas chromatography (GC). Atotal of 74 uni-algal cultures were obtained from Biofuel and Bioenergy laboratory of the National Institute of Fundamental Studies (NIFS), Kandy, Sri Lanka. The total lipid content was recorded highest in Oscillatoria sp. (31.9 ± 2.01% of dry biomass) followed by Synechococcus sp. (30.6 ± 2.87%), Croococcidiopsis sp. (22.7 ± 1.36%), Leptolyngbya sp. (21.15 ± 1.99%), Limnothrixsp. (20.73 ± 3.26%), Calothrix sp. (18.15 ± 4.11%) and Nostoc sp. (15.43 ± 3.89%), Cephalothrixsp. (13.95 ± 4.27%), Cephalothrix Komarekiana (13.8 ± 3.56%) and Westiellopsisprolifica (12.80 ± 1.97%). FAME analysis showed cyanobacteria contain Methyl palmitoleate, Linolelaidic acid methyl ester, Cis-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid methyl ester, Cis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl ester, Methyl myristate, Methyl pentadecanoate, Methyl octanoate, Methyl decanoate, Methyl laurate, Methyl tridecanoate, Methyl palmitoleate, Methyl pentadeconoate, Methyl heptadeconoate, Linolaidic acid methyl ester, Methyl erucate, Methyl myristate, Myristoloeic acid, Methyl palmitate, Cis-9-oleic acid methyl ester, Methyl arachidate and Cis-8,11,14-ecosatrieconoic acid methyl ester. The present study revealed that cyanobacteria isolated from Sri Lanka are potential source for biodiesel industry because of their high fatty acid content. Further studies are required to optimize the mass culture conditions to increase thelipid content from cyanobacterial biomass along with the research in the value addition to the remaining biomass.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiesel; Cyanobacteria; Gas chromatography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32489288      PMCID: PMC7253897          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.219


Introduction

It is estimated that the global energy demand will grow by more than one-third over the period to 2035 (IEA, 2012). As the global petroleum reserves are shrinking at a fast pace, there is an increase in the demand for alternate fuels (Mutanda et al., 2011). But fossil fuels are non-renewable and will be depleted within next 150 years if this consumption rate stays unchanged (Ferdous et al., 2014). However, the increasing fuel demand worldwide, limited reserve and its effect on environmental pollution and contribution to global warming push scientists to look for alternative, clean and renewable source in replacement of fossil fuel (Posten & Schaub, 2009). Biodiesel has been attracted as a significant potential replacement for this. Researchers have proposed several alternative candidates to displace fossil fuels so that the energy sectors could be made more sustainable (Korres et al., 2010). Most of the discussions for biofuel production has focused on higher plants such as cornpan>, pan> class="Species">sugarcane, palm oil, soybean and other higher plants and these are associated with problems over utilization of arable land, loss of ecosystems along with the competition with human consumptions (Gnansounou et al., 2008, Pandey, 2009, Parmar et al., 2011). Thus far, United States of America (USA), South East Asia, Europe and South America produce biodiesel from vegetable oil extracted from food crops such as corn, canola, soybean, palm, etc. There is already an amplifying warning and rejection on food crops for biofuel production. To overcome these drawbacks for the last two decades scientists' are emphasizing on renewable sources for biodiesel which has no competition with human consumption and economically viable. While most bio-energy options fail on both counts, several microorganism-based options have the potential to produce large amounts of renewable energy without disruptions. Since land-based biodiesel production competes with conpan>ventionpan>al food productionpan>, a pan> class="Chemical">water-based biomass and biodiesel production from cyanobacteria offers large potential (Steinhoff et al., 2014). The use of lipids obtained from cyanobacteria biomass has been described as a promising alternative for production of biodiesel to replace petro-diesel (dos Santos et al., 2014). Cyanobacteria can convert up to 10% of the sun’s energy into biomass, compared to 5% achieved by eukaryotic n class="Species">algae anpan>d 1% recorded by conpan>ventionpan>al energy crops such as cornpan> or pan> class="Species">sugarcane (Parmar et al., 2011). During this process they also transform carbon dioxide into biochemical compounds that can be processed into biofuels, food, feed stocks and high value bioactive compounds (Pereira et al., 2011). Due to their high biomass productivity, rapid growth potential and ability to synthesize and accumulate large amounts (approximately 20–50% of dry weight) of neutral lipid stored in cytosolic lipid bodies, cyanobacteria are viwed as promising feedstock for carbon–neutral biofuels (Halim et al., 2013, Mutanda et al., 2011). Therefore these photosynthetic microorganisms can potentially be employed for the production of biofuels in an economically effective and environmentally sustainable manner and at rates high enough to replace a substantial fraction of our society’s use of fossil fuels (Li et al., 2008). In Sri Lanka, fossil fuel is used as the source of energy in many sectors and n class="Chemical">oil prices directly impacts the econpan>omy anpan>d developmenpan>t of the country. To meet sustainable nationpan>al developmenpan>t, it is time to explore the enpan>vironpan>menpan>tal frienpan>dly, renpan>ewable anpan>d low cost alternpan>ative fuels. Fossil fuel enpan>ergy conpan>sumptionpan> (% of total) in Sri Lanpan>ka was 45.87 as of 2013. Its highest value over the past 43 years was 50.55 in 2014, while its lowest value was 23.53 in 1976 (Inpan>ternpan>ationpan>al Enpan>ergy Agenpan>cy, 2014). The present study was carried out to extract total lipid anpan>d produce biodiesel from cyanpan>obacteria isolated from freshpan> class="Chemical">water bodies of Sri Lanka. The fatty acids of extracted lipids were characterized using gas chromatography. The biomass of cyanobacteria was obtained by semi-mass culturing and mass culturing of selected cyanobacteria.

Materials and methods

Materials

All of the chemicals employed herein were of analytical grade which were utilized as proclaimed. The mass fraction purity of NaOH, pan> class="Chemical">di-methyl sulphoxide (DMSO), Dichloromethane, sodium methoxide and acetic acid were 0.99, 0.98, 0.99, 0.98 and 0.99 respectively and purchased from Merk, Germany.

Semi-mass culturing and mass culturing of cyanobacteria

Semi mass culturing was carried out in 10 L aspirator bottles filled with one third of n class="Chemical">BG11 (Stanpan>ier et al., 1971) anpan>d GO (Rippka et al., 1979) media under 2000 lx light intenpan>sity, pH 7.5 anpan>d shaking at 200 rpm provided by anpan> aerator (Rishenpan>g RS 2800). Mass culturing of cyanpan>obacteria was carried out in 100 L size fish tanpan>k under greenpan> house enpan>vironpan>menpan>t with natural light anpan>d tempan> class="Chemical">perature. Media was prepared at half strength of respective BG11 (Stanier et al., 1971) and GO (Rippka et al., 1979) at pH 7.5 along with aeration (Risheng RS 2800).

Determination of higest biomass concentration

For harvesting biomass, growth concentration of cyanobacteria was measured using a sn class="Chemical">pectrophotometric (UV-2450, Shimadzu) method. Inpan> brief, absorbanpan>ce of the culture was takenpan> at the ranpan>ge of 660 to 690 nm wavelenpan>gth. The highest value of absorbanpan>ce was selected to measure the growth conpan>cenpan>trationpan>. The maximum absorbanpan>ce value for each cyanpan>obacteria was used to pan> class="Chemical">perform the growth curve by optical density (OD) (Rodrigues et al., 2011).

Harvesting biomass

In case of semi mass culturing, algal biomass were harvested by centrifuging the cultures in 2000 rpm for 5 min at 27 °C temperature. The cell pellet was separated in order to be dried at 60 °C for 24 h in oven to obtain dry matter (%). For the purpose of harvesting biomass from mass culture, flocculation technique was applied. pH of the culture was increased using NaOH anpan>d the biomass was allowed to sediment. After sedimentationpan> the pan> class="Chemical">water was filtered using 20 µm filter. The biomass was then oven dried and made into a fine powder for analysis.

Quantitative analysis of total pigments

The phycoerytherin (n class="Chemical">PE), phycocyanpan>in (PC) & allophycocyanpan>in (pan> class="Disease">APC) pigments were determined using the method below: 0.5 g of biomass was added to 10 mL of DMSO anpan>d sonpan>icated for 30 minpan>. Homogenized sample was then centrifuged for 15 minpan> at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C. The supan> class="Chemical">pernatant (0.5 mL) was mixed with 4.5 mL of DMSO and this mixure was used for the experiment. Absorbance was recorded at 480 nm, 562 nm, 615 nm, 649.1 nm, 652 nm and 665.1 nm (UV-2450, Shimadzu). The quantities of PE, PC, APC, Chlorophyll-a (Ch-a), Chlorophyll-b (Ch-b) and Carotene (Cx+c) in the different extracts were calculated using following equations (Bennett and Bogorad, 1973, Bryant et al., 1979, Sumanta et al., 2014): n class="Disease">APC = {A652 – 0.208(A615)}/5.09 mg mL−1 PC = {A615 −0.474(A652)}/5.34 mg mL−1 PE = {pan> class="CellLine">A562-2.41(PC) – 0.849(APC)} /9.62 mg mL−1 n class="Chemical">Ch-a = 12.47A665.1 – 3.62A649.1 µg mL−1 n class="Chemical">Ch-b = 25.06A649.1 – 6.5A665.1 µg mL−1 Cx+c = (1000A480 – 129Ca – 53.78Cb)/220 µg mL−1

Gravimetric quantification of total lipids

The intial weight of biomass was recorded and total lipid was extracted usinpan>g sohxlet extractionpan> apparatus where pan> class="Chemical">hexane was used as extraction solvent. Extracted solvent was evaporated using rotor evaporator (Heidolph, Hei-VAP). The remaining oil was transfered in a pre-weighed screw capped glass vial and the amount of lipid content was measured gravimetrically on w/w % of dry biomass by taking the difference in the pre- and final weights of the vial.

Preparation of FAME (Biodiesel)

0.2 mL of extracted oil was takenpan> for anpan>alysis. pan> class="Chemical">Dichloromethane (0.3 mL) and 2.0 mL of 0.5 M sodium methoxide were added into screw capped tubes containing the sample. The tubes were vortexed and then heated for 30 min at 50 °C in a heat block. The reaction was stopped by careful drop wise addition of 5.0 mL of distilled water containing 0.1 mL of glacial acetic acid. Esterified fatty acids were extracted into 0.5 mL of hexane and hexane layer was separated by centrifugation (1500 rpm for 10 min) at 5 °C and hexane layer was removed by using a Pasteur pipette. Esterified samples were stored at −20 °C until they were analyzed by using GC (Agilent 7860B).

GC analysis of FAME

A fused silica gas chromatography capillary column (Sun class="Chemical">pelco 2560) was used in a gas chromatograph equippan> class="Chemical">ped with flame ionization detector (Agilent 7890B) by the method of Yaniv et al., (1996). FAME standard was purchased from Sigma Aldrich to identify the fatty acid in cyanobacteria sample.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis were done using ANOVA inpan> SAS 9.1 (SAS, 1999), MIpan> class="Chemical">NITAB-14 and SPSS-16 statistical software packages. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. The P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Results and discussion

Biomass and total pigments production in cyanobacteria

Biomass, is defined as the mass of living biological organisms in a given area or ecosystem at a given time. In a natural water body the higher cyanpan>obacterial biomass may sometimes cause the formationpan> of pan> class="Disease">algal blooms leading to releasing of cyanotoxins. According to previous report cyanobacteria had been considered as “blooms” at a biomass concentration of about 200 µg/L in the mixed upper 10 cm of the water (Olenina et al., 2009, Wasmund et al., 2011). In the present study, the rate of biomass production of cyanobacteria in laboratory condition was measured and expressed as milligram of biomass per milliliter of pan> class="Chemical">water (mg/mL). As the aim of the present study was to extract fatty acid from cyanobacterial biomass, the fatty acid yield was calculated based on the percentage of dry biomass. Furthermore, higher biomass had a greater effect on harvesting higher fatty acid, as more biomass results with a dense growth of cyanobacteria in the media (Tsygankov et al., 2002). In this context, the use of biomass for energy production is regarded as a suitable alternative owing to its renewable and carbon neutral features (Cho et al., 2011). The highest biomass was recorded from the isolate U9 (215 mg/mL) followed by U55 (91.8 mg/mL), U4 (73.8 mg/mL), U58 (71 mg/mL), U57 (59 mg/mL), U63 (63 mg/mL), U67 (57 mg/mL), U27 (53.3 mg/mL), U1 (50 mg/mL), U13 (35.6 mg/mL) respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Total pigments and biomass production in different cyanobacteria strain. The identities of the isolates denoted by the codes (U1, U2…) are shown in Annex- 1.1.

Total pigments and biomass production in different cyanobacteria strain. The identities of the isolates denoted by the codes (U1, U2…) are shown in Annex- 1.1. At the same time the highest total pigments were recorded for the isolate U27 (249.90 µg/mL) followed by U44 (188.4 µg/mL), U39 (178.61 µg/mL), U49 (176.26 µg/mL), U38 (172.3 µg/mL), U45 (153.75 µg/mL), U40 (147.05 µg/mL), U43 (134.98 µg/mL), U31 (143.61 µg/mL), U2 (128.14 µg/mL), U19 (120.03 µg/mL), U20 (111.46 µg/mL), U1 (102.32 µg/mL), U22 (68.12 µg/mL) and U55 (10.99 µg/mL) resn class="Chemical">pectively (Fig. 1). A study in Brazil reports, Geitlerinema amphibium produced up to 2.74 mg g−1 of pan> class="Chemical">astaxanthin and 5.49 mg g−1 of lutein, which is seven times more lutein than Marigold, currently the main raw material used commercially (D’Alessandro et al., 2019). Cyanobacteria possess a wide range of pigmentation due to their photosynthetic pigments consisting of chlorophyll-a (which all of them possess) together with different concentrations of accessory phyco-biliprotein pigments, phycocyanin (blue) and phycoerythrin (red). The final external colour of a specimen is largely dependent upon the concentrations of these pigments. Characteristically all cyanobacteria have thin or thick gelatinous sheaths outside their cell walls, their thickness and sometimes their colour contribute to the final appearance of the organism. Recently a few species of cyanobacteria have been investigated for biofuel production because their ability to convert solar energy to chemical energy has been found to be the most efficient among all living organisms. The efficiency rate for solar energy conversion in corn and sugarcane as 1–2%, for algae it is 5% and for cyanobacteria it is estimated as 10%. This is possible because of the photosynthetic pigments variations of cyanobacteria. In addition to chlorophyll-a cyanobacteria have phycobilisomes with the thylakoid membranes which act as antennae to harvest light for photosystem II. Among the pigments contained in the phycobilisomes, phycoerythrin absorbs energy between the wave lengths of 500 – 600 nm, phycocyanin absorbs between 550 and 650 nm and allophycocyanin absorbs between 600 and 675 nm. Together with chlorophyll-a, their light absorption capacity will therefore extend right across the entire spectrum of visible light. Researchers showed that certain part of the oil synthesis machinery in the chloroplasts of the plants and cyanobacteria are from same origin. The result showed cyanobacteria are capable of producing lipid which could be converted into fatty acid methyl ester to produce oil (Mohammed et al., 2020).

Mass culturing

Biomass harvesting time

The light absorbances of cyanobacteria selected (based on total lipid, biomass anpan>d pigments productionpan>) for mass culturinpan>g inpan> the present study at different growth stages are shownpan> inpan> Fig. 2. Anpan> inpan>creased conpan>centrationpan> of biomass with the inpan>crease inpan> the number of days was observed. A slight steady growth was observed from 5th week onpan>wards (Fig. 2). Wavelength was scanpan>ned anpan>d maximum absorbanpan>ce was recorded between 687 anpan>d 690 nm for the present study. The maximum absorbanpan>ce was measured up to 39th day of growinpan>g, which was founpan>d to have same characteristics for all culture. The present study was supported by anpan>other study carried out by Sanpan>tos anpan>d others (Sanpan>tos-Ballardo et al., 2015). The maximum absorbanpan>ce difference inpan> cyanpan>obacteria could be due to the different conpan>tents of pigments, such as pan> class="Chemical">chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b and carotenoids present in the cells (Bricaud et al., 1998). These results are similar to previous reports, where, for cell growth of some microalgae species, wavelengths were from 664 to 678 nm (Padovan, 1992), 680 nm (Geis et al., 2000), 684 nm (Rodrigues et al., 2011), and 687 nm (Valer & Glock, 1998).
Fig. 2

Absorbance of cyanobacterial concentration in mass culture.

Absorbance of cyanobacterial concentration in mass culture. Gas chromatogram image of cyanobaccterial isolate n class="Species">Synechococcus sp. (U10). However, the standard tests of microalgal growth measurement using spectrophotometry, the wavelength 664–690 nm ranpan>ge is recommended, as these values are correlated with the absorbanpan>ce of pan> class="Chemical">chlorophyll (Bricaud et al., 1998). In the present study, the cyanobacterial mass culture was found to grow continuously up to 35th day of its culture and showed steady growth curve thereafter. Therefore the optimum time of harvesting biomass from mass culture was 5th weeks onwards (Fig. 2). U1: Leptolyngbya sp., U2: pan> class="Species">Phormidium sp., U5: Lyngbya sp., U6: Anabaena sp., U10: Synechococcus sp., U13: Croococcidiopsis sp., U15: Calothrix sp., U22: Cephalothrix sp., U30: Limnothrix sp., U55: Oscillatoria sp., U58: Westiellopsis sp., U67: Limnothrix sp.

Harvesting technique

Harvesting biomass from mass culture is one of the major hurdles in cyanobacterial research. In the presesent study flocculation technique was applied to harvest biomass. High molecular weight extracellular metabolites produced by cyanobacteria accumulate rapidly during the late log phase. These polymeric molecules comprise of long chain n class="Chemical">polysaccharides, proteinpan>s anpan>d nucleic acids anpan>d are of sufficient length to form bridges between algal particles, hence enhanpan>cinpan>g flocculationpan>. Due to pH inpan>crease inpan> the culture the extracellular polymers onpan> the surface of the cyanpan>obacterial cell colonpan>ies binpan>ds together causinpan>g them to become too dense to remainpan> afloat. In the present study flocculatinpan>g pH for different cyanpan>obacteria strainpan>s were founpan>d to be different (Table 1).
Table 1

Flocculating pH of samples.

Samples testedpH value at 39th Day of cultureFlocculating pH
U 019.0111.51
U 029.80>12.00
U 059.1911.52
U 1010.17>12.00
U 1310.3611.52
U 229.40>12.00
U 3010.3211.85
U 159.6112.00
U 69.8111.81
U 559.5911.55
U 589.3611.51
U 679.4611.60

U1: Leptolyngbya sp., U2: Phormidium sp., U10: Synechococcus sp., U22: Cephalothrix sp., U55: Oscillatoria sp., U58: Wetiellopsis sp., U13: Croococcidiopsis sp., U30: Limnothrix sp., U5: Lyngbya sp., U6: Anabaena sp., U15: Calothrix sp., U67: Limnothrix sp.

Flocculating pH of samples. U1: Leptolyngbya sp., U2: pan> class="Species">Phormidium sp., U10: Synechococcus sp., U22: Cephalothrix sp., U55: Oscillatoria sp., U58: Wetiellopsis sp., U13: Croococcidiopsis sp., U30: Limnothrix sp., U5: Lyngbya sp., U6: Anabaena sp., U15: Calothrix sp., U67: Limnothrix sp.

Total lipid in cyanobacteria

The lipid conpan>tent was recorded maximum inpan> the isolate U55 as pan> class="Species">Oscillatoria sp. (31.9 ± 2.01% of dry biomass) followed by U10 as Synechococcus sp. (30.6 ± 2.87%), U13 as Croococcidiopsis sp. (22.7 ± 1.36%), U1 as Leptolyngbya sp. (21.15 ± 1.99%), U30 as Limnothrix sp. (20.73 ± 3.26%), U67 as Limnothrix sp. (19.05 ± 0.78%), U15 as Calothrix sp. (18.15 ± 4.11%), U3 as Limnothrix sp. (18.05 ± 2.77%), U5 as Lyngbya sp. (16.05 ± 3.88%), U49 as Nostoc sp. (15.43 ± 3.89%), U57 as Plectonema sp. (14.8 ± 2.22%) respectively (Fig. 4). It was observed that the unicellular strains were proved as potential candidateswith high lipid content. However, filamentous strains such as Oscillatoria sp., Leptolyngbya sp., Limnothrix sp., and Lyngbya sp. were found to be highly lipid rich in the present study.
Fig. 4

Lipid content (% of dry biomass) in different cyanobacterialisoaltes. The identities of the isolates denoted by the codes (U1, U2…) are shown in Annex 1.

Lipid conpan>tenpan>t (% of pan> class="Disease">dry biomass) in different cyanobacterialisoaltes. The identities of the isolates denoted by the codes (U1, U2…) are shown in Annex 1. Accordingly, the lipid conpan>tent of the cyanpan>obacterial culture reported inpan> this study was founpan>d similar or higher thanpan> the recent values reported inpan> some other studies (Cheng et al., 2013, Ehimen et al., 2010, Órpan> class="Chemical">pez et al., 2009, Song et al., 2013, Wahlen et al., 2011). The average lipid content of cyanobacteria and microalgae species is commonly 20–50% by weight of their dry biomass, although up to 80% of lipid contents have been reported (Chisti, 2007, Rajvanshi and Sharma, 2012). The lipid content is known to vary not only by the species of cyanobacterial cells, but also the growing conditions and the growth phase of the cells. These types of information are not usually available in the literature (Soydemir et al., 2016). However, Soydemir et al., (2016) reported that, mixed micro algal cultures was subjected to very low concentrations of nutrients at the time of the harvesting, the cells were at the stationary growth phase and N and P concentrations in water phase were about 3 mg L−1 and 0.1 mg L−1 respectively. Under such nutrient limiting conditions, the cells are expected to accumulate lipids (Soydemir et al., 2016). However, the nutritional requirements of cyanobacteria could be addressed by culturing them in wastewater. In Finland, researchers have explored the use of cyanobacteria to treat wastewater and feedstock for biodiesel production simultaneously. Cyanobacteria was reported best to clean municipal wastewater (Meghan Sapp, 2019). Total glycerides (pan> class="Chemical">TG) are the parts of the lipids that are converted to biodiesel. For analysis of TGs, the preferred method involves esterification to form FAME. Using this approach in our studies, the TG content of the cyanobacterial lipid samples were measured gravimetrically or using GC. Once TG amount is quantified, an estimation was made as to how much of lipid can potentially be converted into biodiesel. In the present study, it was observed that the cyanobacteria isolated from the dry zone are more competitive for pan> class="Chemical">lipid content. This can be due to their greater survival skills in high temperaure, pH and other physicochemical properties in that zone. The deposited fat might provide energy during dry periods for cyanobacterial survival.

Fatty acid compositions in cyanobacteria

The characterization of the FAME compositionpan> usinpan>g GC anpan>alysis showed the presence of high pan> class="Chemical">Methyl palmitate, Linolelaidic acid methyl ester, Heptadecanoic acid methyl ester, Methyl octanoate, Methyl decanoate, Methyl laurate, Methyl tridecanoate, Methyl myristate, Myristoloeic acid, Cis-9-oleic acid methyl ester, Methyl arachidate, Cis-8,11,14-ecosatrieconoic acid methyl ester etc (Table 2). A representative scheme for GC analysis of Synechococcus sp. (U10) has been illustrated in Fig. 3. According to the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D6751) biodiesel standard, good quality biodiesel should have high oxidation stability, high cetane number and low iodine value. Another study on Amazonian cyanobacteria reported that Limnothrix sp. had a better lipid profile and produced high amounts of C16:0, which is favorable for the production of biodiesel. This strain also had better cetane number (58.06) above the minimum established by the ASTM (American Society for Tests and Materials) (de Oliveira et al., 2018).
Table 2

Composition of fatty acid methyl esters related climatic zones and lipid % in cyanobacteria selected for the present study.

Strain IDName of isolateType of FAMEClimatic zoneLipid (% on dry biomass)
U-1Leptolyngbya sp.Methyl behenateWet zone21.15 ± 1.99%
U-2Phormidium sp.Methyl palmitoleate, Linolelaidic acid methyl ester, Cis-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid methyl esterWet zone6.08 ± 1.21%
U-7Phormidium sp.Cis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl ester, Methyl myristate, Methyl pentadecanoateDry Zone18.05 ± 2.11%
U-10Synechococcus sp.Cis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl ester, Methyl octanoate, Methyl decanoate, Methyl laurate, Methyl tridecanoate, Methyl myristateIntermediate zone30.6 ± 2.87%
U-13Croococcidiopsis sp.UndentifiedDry Zone22.7 ± 1.36%
U-16Croococcidiopsis sp.UndentifiedWet zone13.40 ± 2.94%
U-22Cephalothrixsp.Cis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl esterDry Zone13.95 ± 4.27%
U-41Cephalothrix komarekianaCis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl esterDry Zone13.8 ± 3.56%
U-42Synechocystis sp.Methyl palmitoleateDry Zone10.90 ± 2.65%
U-55Oscillatoriales sp.Methyl pentadeconoate, Methyl heptadeconoate, Linolaidic acid methyl ester, Methyl erucateDry Zone31.9 ± 2.01%
U-58WestiellopsisprolificaCis-10-heptadecanoic acid methyl esterIntermediate zone12.80 ± 1.97%
U-67Limnothrix sp.Methyl myristate, Myristoloeic acid, Methyl palmitate, Cis-9-oleic acid methyl ester, Methyl arachidate, Cis-8,11,14-ecosatrieconoic acid methyl esterDry Zone20.73 ± 3.26%
Fig. 3

Gas chromatogram image of cyanobaccterial isolate Synechococcus sp. (U10).

Composition of fatty acid methyl esters related climatic zonpan>es anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">lipid % in cyanobacteria selected for the present study. It is reported that higher amount of palmitic and stearic acid result with high pan> class="Chemical">cetane number and lower iodine value (Kaur et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2009). In the present study, some of the peaks were unidentified because of overlapping with several other peaks or shifting the retention time in the chromatogram in respect to the standard peaks (U13 and U16).

Conclusions

The present study was carried out to isolate cyanobacteria from fresh water bodies of Sri Lanpan>ka, to inpan>vestigate them as a potential source for biodiesel anpan>d other value added products. A total 74 cyanpan>obacterial monpan>ocultures were obtainpan>ed. It was founpan>d that cyanpan>obacteria are highly rich inpan> pan> class="Chemical">lipid content and total lipid content was recorded highest in Oscillatoriales with sp.31.9 ± 2.01% of dry biomass. The Gas chromatograph of FAME confirmed the presence of different types of esters which indicated the potential of using cyanobacteria as a raw material for biodiesel industry. At the same time, the remaining biomass was found to be rich in high carbohydrate, high protein, antioxidant properties, antipathogenic properties, high sun protection factor value and high pigments content. Molecular identification key confirmed the presence of a novel species Cephalothrix komarekiana for the first time in Sri Lanka. Further studies are required for optimization of mass culture conditions of cyanobacteria. To increase the lipid yeild, cyanpan>obacterial mixed cultures canpan> be conpan>sidered. Attempts should be taken for identificationpan> anpan>d isolationpan> of the active compounpan>ds responpan>sible for anpan>tipathogenic anpan>d anpan>tioxidanpan>t propan> class="Chemical">perties. The procedures for biodiesel production in the current study should be followed by standard purification procedures to obtain high cetane number.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Microalgae and terrestrial biomass as source for fuels--a process view.

Authors:  Clemens Posten; Georg Schaub
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Reuse of effluent water from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in microalgae cultivation for biofuel production.

Authors:  Sunja Cho; Thanh Thao Luong; Dukhaeng Lee; You-Kwan Oh; Taeho Lee
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Hydrogen production by cyanobacteria in an automated outdoor photobioreactor under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  A A Tsygankov; A S Fedorov; S N Kosourov; K K Rao
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Using wet microalgae for direct biodiesel production via microwave irradiation.

Authors:  Jun Cheng; Tao Yu; Tao Li; Junhu Zhou; Kefa Cen
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Biodiesel production potential of mixed microalgal culture grown in domestic wastewater.

Authors:  Gulfem Soydemir; Ulker Diler Keris-Sen; Unal Sen; Mirat D Gurol
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Potential use of a thermal water cyanobacterium as raw material to produce biodiesel and pigments.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bezerra D'Alessandro; Aline Terra Soares; Natália Cristina de Oliveira D'Alessandro; Nelson Roberto Antoniosi Filho
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Biodiesel production by simultaneous extraction and conversion of total lipids from microalgae, cyanobacteria, and wild mixed-cultures.

Authors:  Bradley D Wahlen; Robert M Willis; Lance C Seefeldt
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 8.  Cyanobacteria and microalgae: a positive prospect for biofuels.

Authors:  Asha Parmar; Niraj Kumar Singh; Ashok Pandey; Edgard Gnansounou; Datta Madamwar
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Triacylglycerol and phytyl ester synthesis in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803.

Authors:  Mohammed Aizouq; Helga Peisker; Katharina Gutbrod; Michael Melzer; Georg Hölzl; Peter Dörmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Biofuels from microalgae.

Authors:  Yanqun Li; Mark Horsman; Nan Wu; Christopher Q Lan; Nathalie Dubois-Calero
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cyanobacteria as a Promising Alternative for Sustainable Environment: Synthesis of Biofuel and Biodegradable Plastics.

Authors:  Preeti Agarwal; Renu Soni; Pritam Kaur; Akanksha Madan; Reema Mishra; Jayati Pandey; Shreya Singh; Garvita Singh
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.