| Literature DB >> 32488062 |
Jakub Žák1,2, Iva Dyková3, Martin Reichard4.
Abstract
Dietary alteration is one of the most universally effective aging interventions, making its standardization a fundamental need for model organisms in aging. In this dietetic study we address the current lack of standardized formulated diet for turquoise killifish Nothobranchius furzeri - a promising model organism. We first demonstrated that N. furzeri can be fully weaned at the onset of puberty onto a commercially available pelleted diet as the sole nutrition when kept in social tanks. We then compared nine somatic and six reproductive parameters between fish fed a typical laboratory diet - frozen chironomid larvae (bloodworms) and fish weaned from bloodworms to BioMar pellets. Both dietary groups had comparable somatic and reproductive performance. There was no difference between diet groups in adult body size, specific growth rate, condition or extent of hepatocellular vacuolation. Fish fed a pelleted diet had higher juvenile body mass and more visceral fat. Pellet-fed males had lower liver mass and possessed a lipid type of hepatocellular vacuolation instead of the prevailing glycogen-like vacuolation in the bloodworm-fed group. No considerable effect was found on reproductive parameters. The negligible differences between dietary groups and good acceptance of pellets indicate their suitability as a useful starting point for the development of standardized diet for Nothobranchius furzeri.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32488062 PMCID: PMC7265286 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65930-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Macronutrient composition of diets fed to turquoise killifish.
| a INICIO 0.4 mm | a INICIO 0.6 mm | a INICIO 0.8 mm | a INICIO 1 mm | a INICIO 1.5 mm | b Bloodworms | b INICIO 0.8 mm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 63.0% | 62.0% | 56.0% | 56.0% | 54.0% | 53.8% ± 3.0% | 59.5% ± 3.0% |
| Crude lipid | 11.0% | 13.0% | 18.0% | 18.0% | 22.0% | 5.2% ± 8.0% | 17.2% ± 8.0% |
| Carbohydrates (NFE) | 7.3% | 6.3% | 9.0% | 9.0% | 7.7% | 22.8% ± 20.0% | 11.0% ± 20.0% |
| Ash | 12.5% | 12.5% | 11.5% | 11.5% | 11.0% | 18.1% ± 2.5% | 12.3% ± 2.5% |
| Moisture | — | — | — | — | — | 82.9% ± 2.0% | 5.9% ± 2.0% |
aOfficial declaration of the manufacturer - BioMar INICIO, Denmark.
bValues from our analysis. Percentages of Crude protein, Crude lipid, Carbohydrates (NFE) and Ash are computed after subtraction of moisture. Values behind ± are precision of the analytical measurements. NFE stands for nitrogen free extract.
Figure 1Growth and condition parameters in the two dietary groups. (a) Age-dependent body mass. (b) Age-dependent standard length. Values in a) and b) for juveniles are tank dependent weighted means (weighted by number of fish). Confidence intervals (CI, 95%) are computed from tank-specific weighted means. (c) Specific growth rate of body size in % per day during whole experimental period in both diet groups. Linear model fit with 95% CI. SGR for body mass is not shown given its similarity with body mass SGR. (d) Fulton’s condition factor with raw data points and model estimated means with 95% CI.
Figure 2Somatic parameters in the bloodworm-fed and pellet-fed dietary groups. (a) Visceral fat score. The values represent sex and tank dependent means and their associated CIs. (b) Liver mass corrected for eviscerated body mass. Model estimated means with 95% CI and original data points. (c) Relative hepatocyte cytoplasmic vacuolation. Model estimated means with 95% CI and original data points. (d) Proportion of hepatocyte cytoplasmic vacuolation types computed from raw data. Numbers in upper parts of bars indicate sample sizes. Note that observation points in plots do not necessarily fit to the presented means due to the role of random factors. Figures without observation points were based on tank-specific means.
Figure 3Various types of hepatocellular vacuolation of Nothobranchius furzeri and extent of hepatocellular vacuolation stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin (a, b, c, d, f, g) and periodic acid Schiff reaction (e) under 175× magnification. (a) Liver parenchyma with no apparent hepatocellular vacuolation, (b) macrovesicular lipid type hepatocellular vacuolation, in analysis considered as lipid type vacuolation, (c) glycogen-like type severe hepatocellular vacuolation, in analysis considered as glycogen-like type vacuolation, (d) mixed size of lipid vacuoles, in analysis considered as lipid type vacuolation, (e) section with glycogen-like type vacoulation stained with periodic acid Schiff reaction. Note stained content of vacuoles. (f) mostly microvesicular lipid type vacuolation, in analysis considered as lipid type of vacuolation, (g) glycogen-like type of minimal hepatocellular vacuolation, in analysis considered as glycogen-like type vacuolation.
Figure 4Reproductive parameters in pellet-fed and bloodworm-fed dietary groups. (a) Fecundity. Raw data points and Negative-Binomial GLMM estimated means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of four combinations of pairs. (b) Proportion of fertilized eggs from four pair combinations. Means and 95% CI are Binomial GLMM estimated values. (c) Reproductive allotment indicated by ovary mass corrected for eviscerated body mass. Model (LME) estimated means and 95% CI and raw observation points. (d) Egg diameter. Model (LME) estimated mean and 95% CI. Observation points are female-specific mean egg sizes. (e) 30 days post fertilization (dpf) survival of egg individually incubated in water. Mean and 95% CI are Binomial GLMM estimated values. Raw data are not presented due to their binomial nature. (f) Egg diapause stage proportion after 30 dpf. Values in the upper part of bars are sample sizes from which diapause stage was determined.
Overview of statistical models with sample sizes.
| Compared parameter (statistical method) | Model | Sample size per dietary group or combination | Sex-specific sample size per group | Sample size per tank | Total sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL 15 days (LME) | SL15 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 90 | 90 J | 30 J | 180 |
| SL 30 days (LME) | SL30 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| SL 56 days (LME) | SL56 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| BM 15 days (LME) | BM15 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 90 | 90 J | 30 J | 180 |
| BM 30 days (LME) | BM30 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| BM 56 days (LME) | BM56 ~ diet + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| SGR (Gaussian LM) | SGR ~ diet + sampling point | 7 | — | — | 14 |
| Fulton’s condition (LME) | K ~ diet + sex + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| VFS (MPA) | VFS ~ diet + error (tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| LM (LME) | LM ~ diet + BMdis + (1|tank) | 32 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:4 F | 64 |
| Additional LM (LME) | LM ~ diet + HVE + BMdis + (1|tank) | 19-21 | 10 M:10 F | 2-3 M:2-3 F | 40 |
| HVE (LME) | HVE ~ diet + sex (1 | tank) | 20-21 | 10 M:10-11 F | 2-3 M:2-3 F | 41 |
| THCV | Pearson’s χ2 test | 19-21 | 10 M:10 F | 2-3 M:2-3 F | 40 |
| N of eggs (Neg.Bin. GLMM) | N eggs ~ pair combination + BM + (1|tank) | 16 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:8 F | 32/2358 |
| FR (Bin. GLMM) | FR ~ pair combination + (1| TM.TF) | 16 | 16 M:16 F | 4 M:8 F | 32/2358 |
| Ovary mass (LME) | OM ~ diet + BMdis + (1|tank) | 16 | 16 F | 4 F | 32 |
| Egg diameter (LME) | ED ~ diet + (1|tank/ID.female) | 16 | 16 F | 4 F | 32/837 |
| 30dpf egg survival (Bin. GLMM) | ES ~ diet + (1|dish) | 100 | — | — | 400 |
| 30 dpf egg diapause stage | Pearson’s χ2 test | 25-31 | — | — | 114 |
TM.TF is combined factor made by joining tank identity of male and tank identity of female.
The number behind the slash symbol is total number of eggs analysed. Models with missing sex factor were performed separately for each sex due to significant sex-specific interaction (or only completed for females in the case of reproductive parameters). LME – Linear mixed effect model[56]; GLMM – Generalized linear mixed effect model[56]. In all binomial models raw data were used instead of percentages to account for sample size. MPA – Multistratum permutation analysis with specified 10000 iterations[57]. χ2 analyses were completed by Pearson’s chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on 10000 replicates). J: juvenile; M: male; F: female. For parameter coding refer to “Experimental procedures”.