Literature DB >> 32487842

Vasopressor use in cardiogenic shock.

Bruno Levy1,2,3, Thomas Klein1,2,3, Antoine Kimmoun1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Data and interventional trials on vasopressor use during cardiogenic shock are scarce. Their use is limited by their side-effects and the lack of solid evidence regarding their effectiveness in improving outcomes. In the present article, we review the current use of vasopressor therapy during cardiogenic shock. RECENT
FINDINGS: Two recent Cochrane analyses concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove that any one vasopressor was superior to others in terms of mortality. A recent RCT and a meta-analysis on individual data suggested that norepinephrine may be preferred over epinephrine in patients with cardiogenic shock, in particular, after myocardial infarction. In patients with right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension, the use of vasopressin may be advocated under advanced monitoring.
SUMMARY: When blood pressure needs to be restored, norepinephrine is a reasonable first-line agent. Information regarding comparative effective outcomes is sparse and their use should be limited to a temporary measure as a bridge to recovery, mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32487842     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  7 in total

1.  Relationship Between Initial Urine Output and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Units: More Is Not Better.

Authors:  Le Li; Zhenhao Zhang; Yulong Xiong; Zhao Hu; Shangyu Liu; Bin Tu; Yan Yao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  The clinical efficacy of integrated care in combination with vasopressin for cardiogenic shock induced by acute myocardial infarction: A randomized controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Ling Xu; Qunxing Li; Delu Yin; Guangyu Song; Hongyan Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Vasopressors and Risk of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Worldwide Pharmacovigilance Analysis and Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Guillaume Geri; Driss Laghlam; Kevin Boussion; Charles Dolladille; Lee S Nguyen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 4.  Timing of vasoactive agents and corticosteroid initiation in septic shock.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Ammar; Abdalla A Ammar; Patrick M Wieruszewski; Brittany D Bissell; Micah T Long; Lauren Albert; Ashish K Khanna; Gretchen L Sacha
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 10.318

Review 5.  A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditi Shankar; Gayathri Gurumurthy; Lakshmi Sridharan; Divya Gupta; William J Nicholson; Wissam A Jaber; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-07

6.  Angiotensin II infusion in COVID-19: An international, multicenter, registry-based study.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Giovanni Landoni; Marlies Ostermann; Nuttha Lumlertgul; Lui Forni; Lucas Alvarez-Belon; Tony Trapani; Patricia V Alliegro; Kai Zacharowski; Carolin Wiedenbeck; Daniel de Backer; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  Characteristics of circulatory failure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Halvor Langeland; Daniel Bergum; Magnus Løberg; Knut Bjørnstad; Thomas R Skaug; Trond Nordseth; Pål Klepstad; Nils Kristian Skjærvold
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.