Lucy R Holland1,2,3, Rick Walker4,5,6,7, Roslyn Henney4, Christine E Cashion8, Natalie K Bradford9. 1. School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 2. Department of Social Work, Welfare and Indigenous Liaison, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. 4. Queensland Youth Cancer Service, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Oncology Services Group, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 7. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia. 8. Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 9. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Healthcare Transformation and School of Nursing at Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) experience cancer at a time of significant developmental transition. Both disease and treatment impact psychosocial well-being in significant, persistent ways. While the impacts are now described, and the need for psychosocial care is increasingly well recognized, to date, the barriers in access to care have not been well delineated. This is essential to understand to facilitate access to appropriate care and improve outcomes. Methods: This study explored the barriers in access to psychosocial care for young people. Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were undertaken with 16 AYAs aged 15-25 years. Eligible participants were diagnosed within the previous 24 months and recruited through the Queensland Youth Cancer Service (QYCS). Transcribed interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Barriers in access to support were related to person-centered, service-related, and systemic factors. Barriers experienced at diagnosis and during treatment were less common compared with barriers after treatment; these were significant and largely related to a lack of holistic, multidisciplinary survivorship care. Conclusion: Barriers in access to psychosocial care are multifactorial, although most can be addressed through health-service responses. Ensuring standardized referral and repeated introduction of psychosocial care for young people is imperative, regardless of location of treatment. Flexible services are especially important for patients treated across different facilities. The development of comprehensive post-treatment survivorship models of care is also essential. Continued evaluation of the experience of young people and the barriers they face is also crucial to ensure responsive service development and promote optimal care.
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) experience cancer at a time of significant developmental transition. Both disease and treatment impact psychosocial well-being in significant, persistent ways. While the impacts are now described, and the need for psychosocial care is increasingly well recognized, to date, the barriers in access to care have not been well delineated. This is essential to understand to facilitate access to appropriate care and improve outcomes. Methods: This study explored the barriers in access to psychosocial care for young people. Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were undertaken with 16 AYAs aged 15-25 years. Eligible participants were diagnosed within the previous 24 months and recruited through the Queensland Youth Cancer Service (QYCS). Transcribed interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Barriers in access to support were related to person-centered, service-related, and systemic factors. Barriers experienced at diagnosis and during treatment were less common compared with barriers after treatment; these were significant and largely related to a lack of holistic, multidisciplinary survivorship care. Conclusion: Barriers in access to psychosocial care are multifactorial, although most can be addressed through health-service responses. Ensuring standardized referral and repeated introduction of psychosocial care for young people is imperative, regardless of location of treatment. Flexible services are especially important for patients treated across different facilities. The development of comprehensive post-treatment survivorship models of care is also essential. Continued evaluation of the experience of young people and the barriers they face is also crucial to ensure responsive service development and promote optimal care.
Entities:
Keywords:
psychosocial; standard of care; supportive care; survivorship
Authors: Martien J P van Bussel; Gaby J Odekerken-Schröder; Carol Ou; Rachelle R Swart; Maria J G Jacobs Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Joachim Cohen; Kim Beernaert; Anne van Driessche; Joni Gilissen; Aline De Vleminck; Marijke Kars; Jurrianne Fahner; Jutte van der Werff Ten Bosch; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 2.567
Authors: Pandora Patterson; Fiona E J McDonald; Kimberley R Allison; Helen Bibby; Michael Osborn; Karen Matthews; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Kate Thompson; Meg Plaster; Antoinette Anazodo Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-05-06