Literature DB >> 32486791

The effect of simulated room acoustic parameters on the intelligibility and perceived reverberation of monosyllabic words and sentences.

Daniel Fogerty1, Ahmed Alghamdi2, Wai-Yip Chan2.   

Abstract

Individual acoustic parameters of reverberation have the potential to affect both the intelligibility of speech and the degree of perceived reverberation. The current experiments used monaural acoustic simulations to investigate the effect of reverberation time (RT) and direct-to-reverberant ratio (DRR) on word and sentence intelligibility at different levels of analysis (phonemes, words, and sentences). Perceived reverberation and recall of sentences were also assessed. Intelligibility and perceived reverberation decreased with increasing RT and decreasing DRR (particularly between 0 and -10 dB). Results indicate consistent effects of both RT and DRR on the intelligibility and perceived reverberation of words and sentences.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32486791      PMCID: PMC7210003          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables.

Authors:  M A Redford; R L Diehl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development of materials for speech audiometry.

Authors:  I J HIRSH; H DAVIS; S R SILVERMAN; E G REYNOLDS; E ELDERT; R W BENSON
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1952-09

3.  Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation.

Authors:  S A Gelfand; I Hochberg
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1976 Jan-Feb

4.  A Speech Perception Test in Simulated Reverberation Conditions.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Spitzer; Sharon A Sandridge; Craig W Newman; Sarah Sydlowski; Robert M Ghent
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55.

Authors:  T W Tillman; R Carhart
Journal:  Tech Rep SAM-TR       Date:  1966-06

6.  Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation.

Authors:  J P Moncur; D Dirks
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-06

7.  A comparison of the Auditec of St. Louis cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on a normal-hearing population.

Authors:  R C Beattie; B J Edgerton; D V Svihovec
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1977-02

8.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences.

Authors:  David L Woods; E William Yund; T J Herron
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010
View more
  3 in total

1.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.