| Literature DB >> 32486363 |
Zhilan Peng1,2, Beibei Chen1,2, Qinsheng Zheng1, Guoping Zhu1,2,3,4,5, Wenhong Cao1,2,3,4,5, Xiaoming Qin1,2,3,4,5, Chaohua Zhang1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Chronic exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation is a major cause for skin photoaging. UVB induces damage to skin mainly by oxidative stress, inflammation, and collagen degradation. This paper investigated the photo-protective effects of peptides from oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis) protein hydrolysates (OPs) by topical application on the skin of UVB-irradiated mice. Results from mass spectrometry showed that OPs consisted of peptides with a molecular weight range of 302.17-2936.43 Da. In vivo study demonstrated that topical application of OPs on the skin significantly alleviated moisture loss, epidermal hyperplasia, as well as degradation of collagen and elastin fibers caused by chronic UVB irradiation. In this study, OPs treatment promoted antioxidant enzymes (SOD and GPH-Px) activities, while decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) level in the skin. In addition, OPs treatment significantly decreased inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) content, and inhibited inflammation related (iNOS, COX-2) protein expression in the skin. Via inhibiting metalloproteinase 1(MMP1) expression, OPs treatment markedly decreased the degradation of collagen and elastin fibers as well as recovered the altered arrangement of extracellular matrix network in the dermis of skin. Our study demonstrated for the first time that OPs protected against UVB induced skin photodamage by virtue of its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as regulating the abnormal expression of MMP-1. The possible molecular mechanism underlying OPs anti-photoaging is possibly related to downregulating of the MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway, while promoting TGF-β production in the skin.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory; antioxidative; oyster; photoaging; polypeptides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32486363 PMCID: PMC7344810 DOI: 10.3390/md18060288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Total ion chromatogram of peptides from oyster enzymatic hydrolysates (OPs).
Main peptide sequences of OPs.
| Sequence | Peptide Sequence | Length | Molecular Mass (Da) | m/z | Scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LTDDQVDEIIRN | 12 | 1429.70 | 714.85 | 257.09 |
| 2 | LTDDQVDEIIRNT | 13 | 1530.75 | 765.37 | 144.7 |
| 3 | LTDDQVDEIIR | 11 | 1315.66 | 657.83 | 132.32 |
| 4 | MWEGEEPTPSEGGPTPK | 17 | 1827.79 | 913.89 | 260.22 |
| 5 | WEGEEPTPSEGGPTPK | 16 | 1696.75 | 848.37 | 215.77 |
| 6 | NNDDIEGSPFK | 11 | 1234.54 | 617.27 | 169.58 |
| 7 | SIDVVILDPH | 10 | 1106.59 | 553.29 | 167.9 |
| 8 | MHIPGSPFE | 9 | 1013.46 | 506.73 | 162.31 |
| 9 | LCPDWEDWNPKN | 12 | 1572.66 | 786.33 | 159.79 |
| 10 | INCKDNRDGTCT | 12 | 1452.60 | 726.30 | 146.11 |
| 11 | IVENPDGTFS | 10 | 1077.49 | 538.74 | 137.13 |
| 12 | VEYLPSKPGEYD | 12 | 1395.65 | 697.82 | 133.91 |
| 13 | YNNDDIEGSPFK | 12 | 1397.60 | 698.80 | 131.17 |
| 14 | LTDGNGRDVPVKT | 13 | 1370.71 | 685.35 | 126.71 |
| 15 | FGKDPFGKDPFDKD | 14 | 1611.75 | 805.87 | 210.93 |
| 16 | GKDPFGKDPFDKD | 13 | 1464.68 | 732.34 | 174.57 |
| 17 | LFQL | 4 | 519.30 | 519.30 | 94.737 |
| 18 | FDLEL | 5 | 635.31 | 635.31 | 86.627 |
| 19 | LLLE | 4 | 486.30 | 486.30 | 83.129 |
| 20 | LLDP | 4 | 456.25 | 456.25 | 82.602 |
| 21 | LEKNKDPINEN | 11 | 1312.66 | 656.33 | 233.84 |
| 22 | ILEEECMFPK | 10 | 1294.59 | 647.29 | 144.09 |
| 23 | FSCRCNCDGSWNCPS | 15 | 1905.66 | 952.83 | 205.31 |
| 24 | SCRCNCDGSWNCPSS | 15 | 1845.62 | 922.81 | 179.5 |
Note: Scores are obtained by comparing a known protein database to measure the similarity between theoretical and experimental mass spectra.
Composition and contents of amino acids of OPs.
| Amino Acid | Total Amino Acid (g/100 g) | Free Amino Acid (g/100 g) | Hydrolyzed Amino Acid (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspartic Acid | 2.18 | Methionine * | 0.23 |
| Threonine * | 0.94 | Isoleucine * | 0.94 |
| Serine | 0.78 | Leucine * | 1.56 |
| Glutamic acid | 3.59 | Tyrosine | 1.09 |
| Proline | 0.86 | Phenylalanine * | 0.55 |
| Glycine | 1.79 | Lysine | 1.33 |
| Alanine | 1.79 | Histidine | 0.31 |
| Cysteine | 1.17 | Arginine * | 1.87 |
| Valine * | 0.23 | Tryptophan * | 0.45 |
| Total | 21.66 |
Note: * essential amino acid.
Figure 2Effects of OPs on UVB-induced skin photodamage in female Kunming mice. (A) Visual appearance of mice with different treatments at the end of experiment period. (B) H and E staining of dorsal skin sections (200×). Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) The moisture content of dorsal skin (n = 8). (D) The epidermis thickness of dorsal skin (n = 8). Data represents as means ± standard deviation (SD), ** p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with the UVB group. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3Representative images of Masson’s trichrome-stained dorsal skin section (200×). Slices stained with dark blue indicates collagen fiber, red indicates cytoplasm and muscle fiber. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 4Representative images of Victoria Blue-stained dorsal skin section (400×). Slices stained with light blue indicate collagen fiber. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Effects of OPs on SOD, and GSH-Px activities, as well as MDA and collagen contents on UVB-induced photoaging mouse skin.
| Groups | SOD | GSH-PX | MDA | Collagen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 66.02 ± 13.81 | 249.86 ± 52.79 | 6.74 ± 0.67 | 20.11 ± 3.17 |
| UVB | 33.05 ± 8.63 * | 99.01 ± 37.65 ** | 25.39 ± 1.23 ** | 15.58 ± 2.23 * |
| UVB + OPs-L | 48.44 ± 8.89 | 115.48 ± 35.01 | 14.95 ± 3.63 # | 15.28 ± 3.86 |
| UVB + OPs-M | 49.60 ± 8.87 # | 140.79 ± 22.50 ## | 9.77 ± 1.22 ## | 18.04 ± 3.58 # |
| UVB + OPs-H | 62.86 ± 16.19 ## | 242.31 ± 39.70 ## | 9.65 ± 1.32 ## | 17.67 ± 0.88 # |
| UVB + VC | 52.70 ± 9.63 ## | 158.48 ± 53.83 # | 16.49 + 3.76 # | 15.91 ± 2.85 |
Note: Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 compared with the UVB group. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount of the enzyme inhibiting the oxidation by 50%. One unit of glutathione peroxidase was defined as the amount of the enzyme leading 1 μmol GSH oxidized per min. SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde.
Figure 5The effect of OPs on pro-inflammatory cytokines contents. (A) IL-1β concentration in the dorsal skin. (B) IL-6 concentration in the dorsal skin. (C) TNF-α concentration in the dorsal skin. data was expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8). ** p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 compared with the UVB group.
Figure 6The effects of OPs on UVB-induced epidermal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and dermic matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) expressions in dorsal skin of mice. (A) Representative photographs of epidermal COX-2 distribution by IHC staining (400×); Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative photographs of epidermal MMP-1 distribution by IHC staining (400×); Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Relative COX-2 positive expression in epidermal layer was assessed by comparing the number of COX-2 positive cells in different groups vs. in the control group from 10 equal sections of immune-stained dorsal skin per animal (n = 4). (D) Relative MMP-1 positive expression in dermis layer was assessed by comparing the number of COX-2 positive cells in different groups vs. in the control group from 10 equal sections of immune-stained dorsal skin per animal (n = 4). ** p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 compared with the UVB group.
Figure 7Protein expression levels of MAPKs and NF-κB (p65) in the skin. (A) Representative western blot images of MAPK (p-JNK, p-p38, p-ERK,) and NF-κB (p65) signal intensities from multiple experiments. (B) Quantitative densitometric analysis of p-JNK/JNK bands. (C) Quantitative densitometric analysis of p-p38/p38 bands. (D) Quantitative densitometric analysis of p-ERK/ERK bands. (E) Quantitative densitometric analysis of p-p65/p65 bands. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments, ** p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 compared with the UVB group.
Figure 8Protein expressions of COX-2, iNOS, MMP-1, and TGF-β in the dorsal skin of mice by Western blotting. (A) Protein expressions of COX-2, and iNOS in dorsal skins of mice; (B) Protein expressions of MMP-1 and TGF-β in dorsal skins of mice. Data were normalized to protein expression of housekeeping gene beta-actin using the delta-Ct method, and expressed as mean ± S.E.M fold of control. ** p < 0.01, compared with the CT group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 compared with the UVB group.
Figure 9Possible mechanism by which OPs attenuated UVB-induced skin photoaging. ↑: level was increased, ↓level was decreased. green color represents effective.