Literature DB >> 32486351

Benchmarking Farm Animal Welfare-A Novel Tool for Cross-Country Comparison Applied to Pig Production and Pork Consumption.

Peter Sandøe1,2, Henning Otte Hansen1, Helle Lottrup Halkjær Rhode2, Hans Houe2, Clare Palmer3, Björn Forkman2, Tove Christensen1.   

Abstract

A pluralist approach to farm animal welfare, combining animal welfare legislation with market-driven initiatives, has developed in many countries. To enable cross-country comparisons of pig welfare, a number of welfare dimensions, covering the features typically modified in legislative and market-driven welfare initiatives aimed at pig production, were defined. Five academic welfare experts valued the different welfare states within each dimension on a 0-10 scale, then assessed the relative contribution of each dimension to overall welfare on a 1-5 scale. By combining these values and weights with an inventory of pig welfare initiatives in five countries, the additional welfare generated by each initiative was calculated. Together with information on the national coverage of each initiative, the Benchmark value for each country's production and consumption of pork could be calculated on a scale from 0 to 100. Two (Sweden and the UK) had a much higher Benchmark value than the rest. However, there was a drop in the Benchmark for consumption in Sweden and the UK (indicating imports from countries with lower-Benchmark values for production). Even though the experts differed in the values and weights ascribed to different initiatives, they were largely in agreement in their ranking of the countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; animal welfare assessment; animal welfare legislation; market-driven animal welfare; pig production; pork

Year:  2020        PMID: 32486351     DOI: 10.3390/ani10060955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  4 in total

1.  Moral Convictions and Meat Consumption-A Comparative Study of the Animal Ethics Orientations of Consumers of Pork in Denmark, Germany, and Sweden.

Authors:  Thomas B Lund; Sigrid Denver; Jonas Nordström; Tove Christensen; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  A Sustainability Compass for policy navigation to sustainable food systems.

Authors:  Aniek Hebinck; Monika Zurek; Thom Achterbosch; Björn Forkman; Anneleen Kuijsten; Marijke Kuiper; Birgit Nørrung; Pieter van 't Veer; Adrian Leip
Journal:  Glob Food Sec       Date:  2021-06

3.  Corticosterone in feathers of laying hens: an assay validation for evidence-based assessment of animal welfare.

Authors:  K E Häffelin; R Lindenwald; F Kaufmann; S Döhring; B Spindler; R Preisinger; S Rautenschlein; N Kemper; R Andersson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  For the Sake of Production-And the Animal, and Me. How Students at Danish Agricultural Colleges Perceive Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Inger Anneberg; Jesper Lassen; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.