Literature DB >> 32486077

Utilisation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in European Countries by Type of Screening Offer: Results from the European Health Interview Survey.

Rafael Cardoso1,2, Feng Guo2,3, Thomas Heisser2,3, Michael Hoffmeister3, Hermann Brenner1,3,4.   

Abstract

In the past two decades, an extensive rollout of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes has been initiated in European countries with a large heterogeneity of screening offers. Using data from a population-based cross-sectional survey conducted between 2013 and 2016 in all European Union countries, we analysed the utilisation of faecal tests and colonoscopy among people aged 50-74 years and the factors associated with uptake by type of screening offer. We observed the highest utilisation of either test for countries with fully rolled out organised programmes with faecal tests (ranging from 29.7% in Croatia to 66.7% in the UK) and countries offering both faecal tests and colonoscopy (from 22.7% in Greece to 70.9% in Germany). Utilisation was very low for countries with no programme (from 6.3% in Romania to 30.5% in Norway). Younger age (50-54 years), longer time since last consultation with a doctor and a lifestyle score associated with increased CRC risk were significantly associated with lower test use, a pattern observed across all types of screening offers. Our results suggest that more countries should implement organised programmes with faecal immunochemical tests, in combination with alternative endoscopy offers where resources allow. Furthermore, there is a large potential for increasing screening use in Europe by better reaching the younger eligible individuals, those who have not been to the doctor recently and those at increased risk for CRC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; faecal tests; screening; utilisation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32486077     DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  11 in total

1.  Overall and stage-specific survival of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer in European countries: A population-based study in 9 countries.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Harlinde De Schutter; Nancy Van Damme; Mef Christina Nilbert; Jane Christensen; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Véronique Bouvier; Guy Launoy; Anne-Sophie Woronoff; Mélanie Cariou; Michel Robaszkiewicz; Patricia Delafosse; Florence Poncet; Paul M Walsh; Carlo Senore; Stefano Rosso; Valery E P P Lemmens; Marloes A G Elferink; Sonja Tomšič; Tina Žagar; Arantza Lopez de Munain Marques; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Montse Puigdemont; Jaume Galceran; Marià Carulla; Antonia Sánchez-Gil; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  Change in colorectal cancer (CRC) testing rates associated with the introduction of the first organized screening program in canton Uri, Switzerland: Evidence from insurance claims data analyses from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sarah Bissig; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Rémi Schneider; Kali Tal; Kevin Selby; Cinzia Del Giovane; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Oliver Senn; Cyril Ducros; Christian P R Schmid; Urs Marbet; Reto Auer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Impact of demographic changes and screening colonoscopy on long-term projection of incident colorectal cancer cases in Germany: A modelling study.

Authors:  Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hanna Tillmanns; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Colorectal Cancer Screening within Colonoscopy Capacity Constraints: Can FIT-Based Programs Save More Lives by Trading off More Sensitive Test Cutoffs against Longer Screening Intervals?

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Steffie Naber; Linda Sharp; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Frank Kee
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2022-05-07

5.  Regional variations and associations between colonoscopy resource availability and colonoscopy utilisation: a population-based descriptive study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Colleen Webber; Jennifer A Flemming; Richard Birtwhistle; Mark Rosenberg; Patti A Groome
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06

Review 6.  Fecal microRNAs, Fecal microRNA Panels, or Combinations of Fecal microRNAs with Fecal Hemoglobin for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Its Precursors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zitong Zhao; Anna Zhu; Megha Bhardwaj; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Socio-economic inequality of utilization of cancer testing in Europe: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  H Bozhar; M McKee; T Spadea; P Veerus; S Heinävaara; A Anttila; C Senore; N Zielonke; I M C M de Kok; N T van Ravesteyn; I Lansdorp-Vogelaar; H J de Koning; E A M Heijnsdijk
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Laura F Gruner; Efrat L Amitay; Thomas Heisser; Feng Guo; Tobias Niedermaier; Anton Gies; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Strongly Divergent Impact of Adherence Patterns on Efficacy of Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Need to Refine Adherence Statistics.

Authors:  Thomas Heisser; Rafael Cardoso; Feng Guo; Tobias Moellers; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.