Literature DB >> 32485371

Evaluating mobile monitoring of on-road emission factors by comparing concurrent PEMS measurements.

Hui Wang1, Ye Wu2, K Max Zhang3, Shaojun Zhang4, Richard W Baldauf5, Richard Snow6, Parikshit Deshmukh7, Xuan Zheng8, Liqiang He1, Jiming Hao9.   

Abstract

Many countries have adopted portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) testing in their latest regulations to measure real-world vehicular emissions. However, its fleetwide implementation is severely limited by the high equipment costs and lengthy setup procedures, posing a need to develop more cost-effective, efficient emission measurement methods, such as mobile chasing tests. We conducted conjoint PEMS-chasing experiments for twelve heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDTs) to evaluate the accuracy of mobile measurement results. Two data processing approaches were integrated to automate the calculations of fuel consumption-based emission factors of nitrogen oxides (NOX). With a total of 245 plume chasing tests conducted, and then averaged by vehicle and road types, we found that the relative errors of vehicle-specific emission factors using an algorithm developed for this project were within approximately ±20% of the PEMS results for all tested vehicles. Stochastic simulations suggested reasonable results could be obtained using fewer chasing tests per vehicle (e.g., 71% for freeways and 94% for local road, equivalent to two chase tests per vehicle). This study improves the understanding of the accuracy of the mobile chasing method, and provides a practical approach for real-time emission measurements for future scaled-up mobile chasing studies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diesel; Emission factors; NOx; Plume chasing; Vehicle emissions

Year:  2020        PMID: 32485371      PMCID: PMC7778828          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Characterizing the spatial variation of air pollutants and the contributions of high emitting vehicles in Pittsburgh, PA.

Authors:  Yi Tan; Eric M Lipsky; Rawad Saleh; Allen L Robinson; Albert A Presto
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  In-Use NOx Emissions from Diesel and Liquefied Natural Gas Refuse Trucks Equipped with SCR and TWC, Respectively.

Authors:  Chandan Misra; Chris Ruehl; John Collins; Don Chernich; Jorn Herner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets.

Authors:  Susan C Anenberg; Joshua Miller; Ray Minjares; Li Du; Daven K Henze; Forrest Lacey; Christopher S Malley; Lisa Emberson; Vicente Franco; Zbigniew Klimont; Chris Heyes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Overestimation of on-road air quality surveying data measured with a mobile laboratory caused by exhaust plumes of a vehicle ahead in dense traffic areas.

Authors:  Sang-Hee Woo; Kyung-Hwan Kwak; Gwi-Nam Bae; Kyung Hwan Kim; Chang Hyeok Kim; Se-Jin Yook; Sangzin Jeon; Sangil Kwon; Jeongsoo Kim; Seung-Bok Lee
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  On-Road Chemical Transformation as an Important Mechanism of NO2 Formation.

Authors:  Bo Yang; K Max Zhang; W David Xu; Shaojun Zhang; Stuart Batterman; Richard W Baldauf; Parikshit Deshmukh; Richard Snow; Ye Wu; Qiang Zhang; Zhenhua Li; Xian Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data.

Authors:  Joshua S Apte; Kyle P Messier; Shahzad Gani; Michael Brauer; Thomas W Kirchstetter; Melissa M Lunden; Julian D Marshall; Christopher J Portier; Roel C H Vermeulen; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Quantifying on-road emissions from gasoline-powered motor vehicles: accounting for the presence of medium- and heavy-duty diesel trucks.

Authors:  Timothy R Dallmann; Thomas W Kirchstetter; Steven J DeMartini; Robert A Harley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production.

Authors:  John D Albertson; Tierney Harvey; Greg Foderaro; Pingping Zhu; Xiaochi Zhou; Silvia Ferrari; M Shahrooz Amin; Mark Modrak; Halley Brantley; Eben D Thoma
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Ambient Air Quality Measurements from a Continuously Moving Mobile Platform: Estimation of Area-Wide, Fuel-Based, Mobile Source Emission Factors Using Absolute Principal Component Scores.

Authors:  Timothy Larson; Timothy Gould; Erin A Riley; Elena Austin; Jonathan Fintzi; Lianne Sheppard; Michael Yost; Christopher Simpson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty.

Authors:  Barouch Giechaskiel; Michael Clairotte; Victor Valverde-Morales; Pierre Bonnel; Zlatko Kregar; Vicente Franco; Panagiota Dilara
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.498

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.