Literature DB >> 3248524

Patterns of junctional communication during development of the early amphibian embryo.

S Guthrie1, L Turin, A Warner.   

Abstract

Cell-cell communication through gap junctions was examined in Xenopus laevis embryos between the 16-cell and early blastula stages using Lucifer Yellow, Fluorescein, lead EDTA and dicyanoargentate as probes of junctional permeability. Injections were made into cells whose position was identified with respect to the primary cleavage axis and the grey crescent. FITC dextrans revealed cytoplasmic bridges between the injected cell and its sister only. In the animal pole at the 16-cell stage at the future dorsal side of the embryo, Lucifer Yellow was frequently and extensively transferred between cells through gap junctions. At the future ventral side gap junctional transfer of Lucifer Yellow was significantly less frequent and less extensive. The asymmetry of transfer between future dorsal and ventral sides of the animal pole was more marked at the 32-cell stage. In the vegetal pole also at the 32-cell stage, a dorsoventral difference in junctional permeability to Lucifer Yellow was observed. At the 64-cell stage the transfer of Lucifer Yellow was relatively frequent between cells lying in the same radial segment in the animal pole; transfer into cells outside each segment was infrequent, except at the grey crescent. At the 128-cell stage, Lucifer transfer between future dorsal or future ventral cells in the equatorial region was infrequent. A high incidence of transfer was restored at the future dorsal side at the 256-cell stage. At the 32-cell stage, fluorescein was infrequently transferred between animal pole cells although lead EDTA moved from cell to cell with high, comparable frequency in future dorsal and ventral regions. Dicyanoargentate always transferred extensively, both at the 32- and 64-cell stages. Treatment of embryos with methylamine raised intracellular pH by 0.15 units, increased the electrical conductance of the gap junction and produced a 10-fold increase in the frequency of Lucifer Yellow transfer through gap junctions in future ventral regions of the animal pole at the 32-cell stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3248524     DOI: 10.1242/dev.103.4.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  10 in total

Review 1.  Gap junctional communication in morphogenesis.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  A quantitive evaluation of gap junctions and their morphological alteration during differentiation of amphibian notochord cells.

Authors:  Zeng Mi-Bai; Zhou Mei-Yun
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1992-02

3.  Maize mesocotyl plasmodesmata proteins cross-react with connexin gap junction protein antibodies.

Authors:  A Yahalom; R D Warmbrodt; D W Laird; O Traub; J P Revel; K Willecke; B L Epel
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Switch in gap junction protein expression is associated with selective changes in junctional permeability during keratinocyte differentiation.

Authors:  J L Brissette; N M Kumar; N B Gilula; J E Hall; G P Dotto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mitochondrial apoptosis-induced channel (MAC) function triggers a Bax/Bak-dependent bystander effect.

Authors:  Pablo M Peixoto; Jennifer K Lue; Shin-Young Ryu; Brian N Wroble; Jill C Sible; Kathleen W Kinnally
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Remodeling of the metabolome during early frog development.

Authors:  Livia Vastag; Paul Jorgensen; Leonid Peshkin; Ru Wei; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Marc W Kirschner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intercellular communication is cell cycle modulated during early Xenopus laevis development.

Authors:  J W Su; L G Tertoolen; S W de Laat; W J Hage; A J Durston
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Gap junctional communication in the early Xenopus embryo.

Authors:  Y Landesman; D A Goodenough; D L Paul
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Differential regulation of the levels of three gap junction mRNAs in Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  R L Gimlich; N M Kumar; N B Gilula
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Quantum dot assisted tracking of the intracellular protein Cyclin E in Xenopus laevis embryos.

Authors:  Yekaterina I Brandt; Therese Mitchell; Gennady A Smolyakov; Marek Osiński; Rebecca S Hartley
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 10.435

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.