Rachel M Aitken1,2, Judith S L Partridge1,3, Charles Matthew Oliver2,4, Dave Murray2,5, Sarah Hare2,6, Sonia Lockwood2,7, Nick Beckley-Hoelscher8, Jugdeep K Dhesi1,3,9. 1. Perioperative Care of Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS), Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2. National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK. 3. Division of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Health Systems Research, UCL Division of Targeted Intervention, London, UK. 5. Department of Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. 6. Department of Anaesthesia, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK. 7. General Surgery Unit, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK. 8. School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. 9. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: older patients aged ≥65 years constitute the majority of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) population. To better understand this group and inform future service changes, this paper aims to describe patient characteristics, outcomes and process measures across age cohorts and temporally in the 4-year period (2014-2017) since NELA was established. METHODS: patient-level data were populated from the NELA data set years 1-4 and linked with Office of National Statistics mortality data. Descriptive data were compared between groups delineated by age, NELA year and geriatrician review. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and discharge to care-home accommodation. RESULTS: in total, 93,415 NELA patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 67 years. Patients aged ≥65 years had higher 30-day (15.3 versus 4.9%, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (20.4 versus 7.2%, P < 0.001) rates, longer LOS (median 15.2 versus 11.3 days, P < 0.001) and greater likelihood of discharge to care-home accommodation compared with younger patients (6.7 versus 1.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality rate reduction over time was greater in older compared with younger patients. The proportion of older NELA patients seen by a geriatrician post-operatively increased over years 1-4 (8.5 to 16.5%, P < 0.001). Post-operative geriatrician review was associated with reduced mortality (30-day odds ratio [OR] 0.38, confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.42, P < 0.001; 90-day OR 0.6, CI 0.56-0.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: older NELA patients have poorer post-operative outcomes. The greatest reduction in mortality rates over time were observed in the oldest cohorts. This may be due to several interventions including increased perioperative geriatrician input.
BACKGROUND: older patients aged ≥65 years constitute the majority of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) population. To better understand this group and inform future service changes, this paper aims to describe patient characteristics, outcomes and process measures across age cohorts and temporally in the 4-year period (2014-2017) since NELA was established. METHODS:patient-level data were populated from the NELA data set years 1-4 and linked with Office of National Statistics mortality data. Descriptive data were compared between groups delineated by age, NELA year and geriatrician review. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and discharge to care-home accommodation. RESULTS: in total, 93,415 NELA patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 67 years. Patients aged ≥65 years had higher 30-day (15.3 versus 4.9%, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (20.4 versus 7.2%, P < 0.001) rates, longer LOS (median 15.2 versus 11.3 days, P < 0.001) and greater likelihood of discharge to care-home accommodation compared with younger patients (6.7 versus 1.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality rate reduction over time was greater in older compared with younger patients. The proportion of older NELA patients seen by a geriatrician post-operatively increased over years 1-4 (8.5 to 16.5%, P < 0.001). Post-operative geriatrician review was associated with reduced mortality (30-day odds ratio [OR] 0.38, confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.42, P < 0.001; 90-day OR 0.6, CI 0.56-0.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: older NELA patients have poorer post-operative outcomes. The greatest reduction in mortality rates over time were observed in the oldest cohorts. This may be due to several interventions including increased perioperative geriatrician input.
Keywords:
general surgery; geriatric assessment; health services research; mortality rates; older people; perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS)
Authors: Ben Fluck; Keefai Yeong; Radcliffe Lisk; Jonathan Robin; David Fluck; Christopher H Fry; Thang S Han Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 5.410
Authors: Carol J Peden; Geeta Aggarwal; Robert J Aitken; Iain D Anderson; Nicolai Bang Foss; Zara Cooper; Jugdeep K Dhesi; W Brenton French; Michael C Grant; Folke Hammarqvist; Sarah P Hare; Joaquim M Havens; Daniel N Holena; Martin Hübner; Jeniffer S Kim; Nicholas P Lees; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo; Shahin Mohseni; Carlos A Ordoñez; Nial Quiney; Richard D Urman; Elizabeth Wick; Christopher L Wu; Tonia Young-Fadok; Michael Scott Journal: World J Surg Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Marc Weijie Ong; Serene Si Ning Goh; Wei Min James Tung; Woan Wui Lim; Hilda Haoling Hu; Choong Yan Lim; Priscilla Ng; Kok Yang Tan; Tiong Thye Jerry Goo Journal: Acute Med Surg Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Nadir Adnan Hacım; Ahmet Akbaş; Yigit Ulgen; Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan; Serhat Meric; Merve Tokocin; Onder Karabay; Gulcin Ercan; Yuksel Altinel Journal: Ann Geriatr Med Res Date: 2021-12-07