Literature DB >> 32484631

Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Repeat-Dose Injections of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results from a Prospective, Open-Label, Phase III Study.

Tanja Fischer, Gerhard Sattler, Welf Prager, Berthold Rzany, Tatjana Pavicic, Gerd Gauglitz, Petra Weissenberger, Shahbaz Riaz.   

Abstract

In aesthetic practice, wrinkles in the upper face are commonly treated with repeat-dose injections. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of repeat-dose injections of incobotulinumtoxinA in the combined treatment of moder-ate to severe upper facial lines (UFL) [glabellar frown lines (GFL), horizontal forehead lines (HFL), and lateral periorbital lines (LPL)]. Healthy subjects (≥18 years) with moderate to severe GFL, HFL, and LPL on the Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) at maximum contrac-tion were administered 54 to 64 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (GFL, 20 U; HFL, 10 to 20 U; LPL, 24 U) in up to four, 120-day treatment cycles. Adverse events (AE) were recorded for each cycle until 120 ± 7 days after treatment. Investigator-assessed MAS scores were evaluated for each treated area at maximum contraction on day 30 [responder = score of “none” (0) or “mild” (1)]. Subject-assessed scores for overall appearance of the upper face of “much improved” or “very much improved” were noted at day 30 of each treatment cycle on the Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS). Overall, 140 subjects were treated, and 125 subjects completed the study. Mean injected units per injection cycle ranged from 56.3 U to 57.7 U. During the four-cycle study period 17.1% of total treated subjects experienced a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). TEAEs of special interest were documented for 9 subjects (6.4%), in 6 of these subjects (4.3%) the TEAEs were related to treatment. No clinically significant mean changes in laboratory and vital-sign values were observed from screening to final-treatment visit. Over the study interval, a response rate of > 80% on the investigator-assessed MAS was reported for all treated areas except HFL. Greater than 80% of subjects in cycles 1, 3, and 4 and 78.5% of subjects in cycle 2 reported ratings of “much improved” or “very much improved” on the GICS for the overall appearance of the upper face. Incobotu-linumtoxinA for the repeat-dose treatment of UFL is safe and well tolerated with a stable safety profile, without new formation of neutralizing antibodies and has excellent efficacy during prolonged administration. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5):461-469. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32484631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  3 in total

Review 1.  [New botulinum toxins for aesthetic dermatology : A comprehensive review].

Authors:  A Patil; M Kassir; U Wollina; M Goldust
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Emerging Trends in Botulinum Neurotoxin A Resistance: An International Multidisciplinary Review and Consensus.

Authors:  Wilson W S Ho; Philipp Albrecht; Pacifico E Calderon; Niamh Corduff; David Loh; Michael U Martin; Je-Young Park; Lis S Suseno; Fang-Wen Tseng; Vasanop Vachiramon; Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Chong-Hyun Won; Jonathan N T Yu; Mary Dingley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Aesthetic Treatments in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ilaria Proietti; Nevena Skroza; Alessandra Mambrin; Federica Marraffa; Ersilia Tolino; Nicoletta Bernardini; Anna Marchesiello; Giovanni Rossi; Salvatore Volpe; Concetta Potenza
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-12-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.