Literature DB >> 32484542

Implementing the new European Regulations on medical devices-clinical responsibilities for evidence-based practice: a report from the Regulatory Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology.

Alan G Fraser1,2, Robert A Byrne3,4, Josef Kautzner5, Eric G Butchart6, Piotr Szymański7, Ilaria Leggeri8, Rudolf A de Boer9, Enrico G Caiani10, Frans Van de Werf2, Panagiotis E Vardas11, Lina Badimon12.   

Abstract

The new European Union (EU) law governing the regulatory approval of medical devices that entered into force in May 2017 will now take effect from 26 May 2021. Here, we consider how it will change daily practice for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and healthcare professionals. Clinical evidence for any high-risk device must be reported by the manufacturer in a Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) that will be publicly available in the European Union Database on Medical Devices (Eudamed) maintained by the European Commission; this will facilitate evidence-based choices of which devices to recommend. Hospitals must record all device implantations, and each high-risk device will be trackable by Unique Device Identification (UDI). Important new roles are envisaged for clinicians, scientists, and engineers in EU Expert Panels-in particular to scrutinize clinical data submitted by manufacturers for certain high-risk devices and the evaluations of that data made by notified bodies. They will advise manufacturers on the design of their clinical studies and recommend to regulators when new technical specifications or guidance are needed. Physicians should support post-market surveillance by reporting adverse events and by contributing to comprehensive medical device registries. A second law on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices will take effect from 2022. We encourage all healthcare professionals to contribute proactively to these new systems, in order to enhance the efficacy and safety of high-risk devices and to promote equitable access to effective innovations. The European Society of Cardiology will continue to advise EU regulators on appropriate clinical evaluation of high-risk devices. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Registries; Regulations;  Medical devices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32484542     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records.

Authors:  Edward A Frankenberger; Frederic S Resnic; Henry Ssemaganda; Susan Robbins; Melissa R Dunbar; Paul Coplan; Shumin Zhang; Cortney Bruno; Mitchell Maltenfort; Jillian B Benedetti; Michael E Matheny; Zoher Ghogawala
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices).

Authors:  A G Fraser; R G H H Nelissen; P Kjærsgaard-Andersen; P Szymański; T Melvin; P Piscoi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 3.  Decision Support Systems in HF based on Deep Learning Technologies.

Authors:  Marco Penso; Sarah Solbiati; Sara Moccia; Enrico G Caiani
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Real-World and Regulatory Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ernst Wellnhofer
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 5.  Digital Health: Implications for Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  Arvind Singhal; Martin R Cowie
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2021-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.