Literature DB >> 32484416

Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 10 Years' Experience.

Francisco Cesar Carnevale1, Airton Mota Moreira1, Andre Moreira de Assis1, Alberto Azoubel Antunes1, Vanessa Cristina de Paula Rodrigues1, Miguel Srougi1, Giovanni Guido Cerri1.   

Abstract

Background Long-term experience with prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia remains limited. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term results of PAE for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study was conducted from June 2008 to June 2018 in patients with moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia-related symptoms. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life score, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume were assessed. PAE was performed with 100-500-μm embolic microspheres. Mixed-model analysis of variance and Kaplan-Meyer method was accessed, as appropriate. Results A total of 317 consecutive men (mean age ± standard deviation, 65 years ± 8) were treated. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 96 months (mean, 27 months). Bilateral and unilateral PAE was performed in 298 (94%) and 19 (6%) men, respectively. Early clinical failure occurred in six (1.9%) and symptom recurrence in 72 (23%) men at a median follow-up of 72 months. Mean maximum improvement was as follows: IPSS, 16 points ± 7; quality-of-life score, 4 points ± 1; prostatic volume reduction, 39 cm3 ± 39 (39% ± 29); maximum urinary flow rate, 6 mL/sec ± 10 (155% ± 293); and postvoid residual volume, 70 mL ± 121 (48% ± 81) (P < .05 for all). Unilateral PAE was associated with higher recurrence (42% vs 21%; P = .04). Baseline PSA was inversely related with recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.9 per nanograms per milliliter of PSA; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8, 0.9; P < .001). Embolization with combined particle sizes (100-500 μm) did not relate to symptom recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 1.1 for 100-500-μm group vs 300-500-μm group and hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.5 for 100-500-μm group vs 100-300-μm group; P = .19).None of the patients presented with urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction. Conclusion Prostatic artery embolization was a safe and effective procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia with good long-term results for lower urinary tract symptoms. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32484416     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Salvage versus primary holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: trends, outcomes and safety analysis.

Authors:  Adri M Durant; Jonathan Moore; Sandeep Voleti; Sarah Wu; Lanyu Mi; Gopal Narang; Scott Cheney; Mitchell Humphreys
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Prostatic Artery Embolization: Indications, Preparation, Techniques, Imaging Evaluation, Reporting, and Complications.

Authors:  Ubenicio Silveira Dias; Maurício Ruettimann Liberato de Moura; Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana; André Moreira de Assis; Antônio Sérgio Zanfred Marcelino; Airton Mota Moreira; Claudia Costa Leite; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Francisco Cesar Carnevale; Natally Horvat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Long-Term Efficacy and Recurrence Prediction of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Zhong-Wei Xu; Chun-Gao Zhou; Wei Tian; Hai-Bin Shi; Sheng Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Therapies for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review of Currently Available Techniques Including Prostatic Artery Embolization, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Prostatic Urethral Lift, Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device and Aquablation.

Authors:  Tiago Bilhim; Patrick Betschart; Pavel Lyatoshinsky; Gautier Müllhaupt; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Penile Glans Necrosis following Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Rare but Serious Complication.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2021-03-13

Review 6.  A state-of-art review on the preservation of sexual function among various minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Impact on erectile and ejaculatory domains.

Authors:  Brian Hung Shin Ng; Eric Chung
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

7.  Advanced image guidance for prostatic artery embolization - a multicenter technical note.

Authors:  Francisco Cesar Carnevale; Timothy McClure; Farah Cadour; Vincent Vidal; André Moreira de Assis; Airton Mota Moreira; Arthur Diego Dias Rocha; Aya Rebet; Charles Nutting
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2021-08-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.