Literature DB >> 32483996

Frequency Threshold for Ablation During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: How High Can You Go?

Ali H Aldoukhi1, Kristian M Black1, Timothy L Hall2, William W Roberts1,2, Khurshid R Ghani1.   

Abstract

Purpose: We performed in vitro studies to assess the relationship of pulse frequency on stone ablation during contact laser lithotripsy and determine if there is a threshold after which its effect on lithotripsy is limited.
Methods: BegoStones were fragmented using a Ho:YAG laser (P120 Moses) and a 230 μm fiber at 0.5 J on long pulse (LP) and Moses distance (MD) modes in contact with the stone. The relationship between the number of pulses (1-40 Hz) on stone crater volume was assessed using three-dimensional confocal microscopy and nonlinear-segmented regression. To simulate a painting technique, we assessed fragmentation (mg/second) at 20, 40, and 60 Hz, with the fiber moving at a speed of 1 and 3 mm/second, respectively. High-speed imaging was used to record ablation.
Results: When the laser fiber was fixed, after 13.0 (LP) and 15.4 (MD) pulses, greater pulse frequency did not lead to a significant increase in stone crater volume. Fragmentation was greatest at higher frequencies and faster fiber speed. Increasing the frequency from 20 to 60 Hz at 3 mm/second increased fragmentation by 82% and 61% for LP and MD modes, respectively. Using high-speed data, if the laser fiber is moving at 1 mm/second, a hypothetical frequency threshold for ablation was calculated to be 52 and 61.6 Hz for LP and MD modes, respectively.
Conclusion: Increasing the fiber speed increases stone ablation when using high frequency settings. When the fiber is fixed there is a threshold after which increasing the pulse frequency leads to minimal gain in ablation. The exact value for threshold when the fiber is moving needs further study. Our study serves to provide insight for parameter selection and safety of laser lithotripsy for dusting technique.

Keywords:  Moses; dusting; frequency; holmium laser; kidney stone; lithotripsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483996     DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  Mechanisms of Pulse Modulated Holmium:YAG Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jason B King; Nitesh Katta; Joel M H Teichman; James W Tunnell; Thomas E Milner
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

3.  Cavitation Plays a Vital Role in Stone Dusting During Short Pulse Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Derek S Ho; Gaoming Xiang; Georgy Sankin; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 4.  New Generation Pulse Modulation in Holmium:YAG Lasers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Antoni Sánchez-Puy; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Pietro Diana; Michael Baboudjian; Alberto Piana; Irene Girón; Andrés K Kanashiro; Oriol Angerri; Pablo Contreras; Brian H Eisner; Josep Balañà; Francisco M Sánchez-Martín; Félix Millán; Joan Palou; Esteban Emiliani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The Role of Cavitation in Energy Delivery and Stone Damage During Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Derek S Ho; Dominick Scialabba; Russell S Terry; Xiaojian Ma; Junqin Chen; Georgy N Sankin; Gaoming Xiang; Robert Qi; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  The Effects of Scanning Speed and Standoff Distance of the Fiber on Dusting Efficiency during Short Pulse Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Daiwei Li; Wenjun Yu; Zhiteng Ma; Chenhang Li; Gaoming Xiang; Yuan Wu; Junjie Yao; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Moses and Moses 2.0 for Laser Lithotripsy: Expectations vs. Reality.

Authors:  Mariela Corrales; Alba Sierra; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.