Literature DB >> 32483929

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmological emergency department visits.

Marco Pellegrini1, Matilde Roda1, Enrico Lupardi1, Natalie Di Geronimo1, Giuseppe Giannaccare2, Costantino Schiavi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483929      PMCID: PMC7300851          DOI: 10.1111/aos.14489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor, The novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) appeared in the Chinese city of Wuhan and precipitously extended across the globe. On the evening of 9 March 2020, the Italian Government ordered a national lockdown to limit social interactions and contain the spread of the infection. As evident in other epidemics, peoples’ fear of infection may affect their utilization patterns of health services and reduce the access to health care (Chang et al. 2004). We have previously noted a significant change in the trends of eye injuries since the beginning of the lockdown (Pellegrini et al. 2020). Herein, we aimed to assess the influence of COVID‐19 on ophthalmological emergency department visits. We reviewed the charts of all patients presenting to the ophthalmological emergency department of the S.Orsola‐Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy) during 6 weeks of national lockdown (from March 10 to 20 April 2020), and compared them with those of the same period of the previous year. Retrieved data included patients' demographics, diagnosis and need for hospital admission. Diagnoses were categorized as unlikely to be emergent, likely to be emergent, and not determined, as previously described (Channa et al. 2016). The total number of ophthalmological emergency department visits during the 2019 study period was 2902 and decreased to 776 in the 2020 study period. Mean age of patients increased from 50.6 ± 22.6 to 53.2 ± 20.5 years (p = 0.003, Student's t‐test), and the proportion of children and adolescents decreased (from 10% to 5.3%). The percentage of males increased from 50.9% to 55.7% (p = 0.017, chi‐squared test). The conditions diagnosed in the two study periods are reported in Table 1. In the 2020 study period, the percentage of possibly emergent diagnoses increased (from 30.7% to 38.1%), while unlikely to be emergent diagnoses decreased (from 65.9% to 57.3%; p < 0.001, chi‐squared test). Patients requiring hospital admission were 27 in the 2019 study period (the indication was retinal detachment in 22 cases, open globe injury in two, corneal ulcer in one, angle closure glaucoma in one, and anterior migration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in one) and nine in the 2020 study period (retinal detachment in eight cases and open globe injury in one).
Table 1

Ophthalmological emergency department diagnoses in the 2019 study period (from March 10 to 20 April 2019) and 2020 study period (from March 10 to 20 April 2020).

Diagnosis2019 period2020 period
Unlikely to be emergent, No. (%)
Conjunctivitis812 (28.0)148 (19.1)
Hordeolum, chalazion, dermatitis313 (10.8)65 (8.4)
Subconjunctival haemorrhage204 (7.0)28 (3.6)
Dry eye disease177 (6.1)49 (6.3)
Posterior vitreous detachment170 (5.9)70 (9.0)
Other visual disturbances91 (3.1)36 (4.6)
Retinopathy66 (2.3)28 (3.6)
Entropion, ectropion, trichiasis38 (1.3)11 (1.4)
Cataract21 (0.7)5 (0.6)
Epiphora19 (0.7)5 (0.6)
Possibly emergent, No. (%)
Foreign body on external eye229 (7.9)79 (10.2)
Corneal abrasion217 (7.5)76 (9.8)
Keratitis115 (4.0)32 (4.1)
Contusion of eyeball99 (3.4)23 (3.0)
Ocular hypertension46 (1.6)19 (2.4)
Uveitis31 (1.1)12 (1.5)
Corneal ulcer27 (0.9)6 (0.8)
Retinal detachment22 (0.8)8 (1.0)
Retinal break22 (0.8)8 (1.0)
Cranial nerve palsy21 (0.7)12 (1.5)
Retinal vascular occlusion17 (0.6)5 (0.6)
Vitreous haemorrhage15 (0.5)4 (0.5)
Eyelid laceration15 (0.5)3 (0.4)
Optic neuropathy14 (0.5)8 (1.0)
Open globe injury2 (0.1)1 (0.1)
Not determined, No. (%)
Surgery‐related problems22 (0.8)11 (1.4
Other77 (2.7)24 (3.1)
Total2902776
Ophthalmological emergency department diagnoses in the 2019 study period (from March 10 to 20 April 2019) and 2020 study period (from March 10 to 20 April 2020). During 6 weeks of national lockdown for COVID‐19, there was a 73% decrease in the number of ophthalmological emergency department visits compared to the same period of the previous year. This may be at least partially due to the measures applied during the lockdown. For instance, social distancing and school closure may limit the spread of infectious conjunctivitis, particularly among children and adolescents. In addition, many patients may choose to manage nonurgent conditions by themselves or through remote communication (e.g. via telephone or video) with their ophthalmologists. Therefore, it is understandable that the percentage of nonemergent diagnoses decreased. However, there was a substantial reduction also of potentially serious conditions, including those requiring urgent surgery such as retinal detachment. This may reflect the patients' reticence towards risking coronavirus exposure in healthcare settings, as reported anecdotally even for life‐threatening conditions such as myocardial infarction (Krumholz 2020). In agreement with this, a recent study documented a substantial decrease in paediatric emergency department visits across five Italian hospitals during the lockdown. In some cases, delayed access to hospital care due to the fear of infection resulted in intensive care unit admission or even death (Lazzerini et al. 2020). The reduced access to health care represents a serious public health concern, and patients with urgent ophthalmological conditions avoiding specialized treatment are at high risk of permanent vision loss. Therefore, it is essential to inform patients on the importance of not delaying needed ophthalmological treatment.
  4 in total

1.  The impact of the SARS epidemic on the utilization of medical services: SARS and the fear of SARS.

Authors:  Hong-Jen Chang; Nicole Huang; Cheng-Hua Lee; Yea-Jen Hsu; Chi-Jeng Hsieh; Yiing-Jenq Chou
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Epidemiology of Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits.

Authors:  Roomasa Channa; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Joseph K Canner; R Sterling Haring; Eric B Schneider; David S Friedman
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19.

Authors:  Marzia Lazzerini; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Apicella; Federico Marchetti; Fabio Cardinale; Gianluca Trobia
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-04-09

4.  Changing trends of ocular trauma in the time of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Marco Pellegrini; Matilde Roda; Natalie Di Geronimo; Enrico Lupardi; Giuseppe Giannaccare; Costantino Schiavi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total
  29 in total

1.  Changing trends in ophthalmological emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  José Escribano Villafruela; Antonio de Urquía Cobo; Fátima Martín Luengo; Víctor Antón Modrego; María Chamorro González-Cuevas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  How COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Children and Adolescents Use of the Emergency Department: the Experience of a Secondary Care Pediatric Unit in Central Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Vierucci; Caterina Bacci; Cristina Mucaria; Francesca Dini; Giovanni Federico; Michela Maielli; Angelina Vaccaro
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-23

3.  To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown on patient care at a tertiary-care ophthalmology institute.

Authors:  Naresh Babu; Piyush Kohli; Chitaranjan Mishra; Sagnik Sen; Dhipak Arthur; Deepesh Chhablani; Girish Baliga; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits for Neurological Diseases in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed K Bamaga; Omar Alharbi; Majed Bajuaifer; Abdulrahman Batarfi; Khalid H Althobaiti; Bader AlQusaibi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-21

5.  Retrospective analysis of ophthalmology referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prepandemic.

Authors:  Amanda Schlenker; Carol Tadrous; Geoffrey Ching; Alfonso Iovieno; Nawaaz Nathoo; Tom Liu; Sonia N Yeung
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  COVID-19's Influence on Ocular Emergency Visits at a Tertiary Referral Center and Its Relationship to Emergency Indications by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Sharon Armarnik; Michael Kinori; Amir Abd Elkader; Sharon Blum Meirovitch; Noa Kapelushnik; Shiran Madgar; Hila Goldberg; Oded Sagiv; Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; Ayelet Priel
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  The effect of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on consultation numbers, consultation reasons and performed services in primary care: results of a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Ingmar Schäfer; Heike Hansen; Agata Menzel; Marion Eisele; Daniel Tajdar; Dagmar Lühmann; Martin Scherer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  Retinal detachment during COVID-19 era: a review of challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Amirhossein Roshanshad; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Spektrum Augenheilkd       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Ophthalmological emergencies and the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

Authors:  Chiara Posarelli; Maria Novella Maglionico; Giuseppe Covello; Pasquale Loiudice; Alessandro Cipriano; Massimo Santini; Michele Figus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decreased retinal detachments during a COVID-19 lockdown period in Colorado.

Authors:  Austin Rohl; Ashton Kalhorn; Jasleen Singh; Naresh Mandava
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.