| Literature DB >> 32483305 |
Jian Yang1, Hongchen Jiang2,3, Wen Liu1, Liuqin Huang1, Jianrong Huang1, Beichen Wang1, Hailiang Dong4,5, Rosalie K Chu6, Nikola Tolic6.
Abstract
Lakes receive large amounts of terrestrially derived dissolved organic matter (tDOM). However, little is known about how aquatic microbial communities interact with tDOM in lakes. Here, by performing microcosm experiments we investigated how microbial community responded to tDOM influx in six Tibetan lakes of different salinities (ranging from 1 to 358 g/l). In response to tDOM addition, microbial biomass increased while dissolved organic carbon (DOC) decreased. The amount of DOC decrease did not show any significant correlation with salinity. However, salinity influenced tDOM transformation, i.e., microbial communities from higher salinity lakes exhibited a stronger ability to utilize tDOM of high carbon numbers than those from lower salinity. Abundant taxa and copiotrophs were actively involved in tDOM transformation, suggesting their vital roles in lacustrine carbon cycle. Network analysis indicated that 66 operational taxonomic units (OTUs, affiliated with Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidia, Bacilli, Gammaproteobacteria, Halobacteria, Planctomycetacia, Rhodothermia, and Verrucomicrobiae) were associated with degradation of CHO compounds, while four bacterial OTUs (affiliated with Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidia and Gammaproteobacteria) were highly associated with the degradation of CHOS compounds. Network analysis further revealed that tDOM transformation may be a synergestic process, involving cooperation among multiple species. In summary, our study provides new insights into a microbial role in transforming tDOM in saline lakes and has important implications for understanding the carbon cycle in aquatic environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32483305 PMCID: PMC7608266 DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0689-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Physicochemical conditions of the sampled lake waters.
| Lake | GPS location | Temperature (°C) | Salinity (g l−1) | pH | TDN (mg l−1) | TDP (mg l−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHL | 36°33.4′N/ 100°43.3′E | 10.3 | 1 | 9.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| QHL | 36°33.3′N/ 100°37.5′E | 11.2 | 13 | 9.4 | 4.6 | 0.1 |
| TSL | 37°11.6′N/ 96°53.3′E | 16.1 | 30 | 9.1 | 6.9 | 0.1 |
| GHL | 37°08.2′N/ 97°34.6′E | 9.6 | 90 | 8.6 | 12.5 | 0.1 |
| XCDL | 37°27.2′N/ 95°30.6′E | 9.3 | 126 | 8.6 | 14.9 | 0.1 |
| CKL | 36°45.1′N/ 99°04.8′E | 13.5 | 358 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 0.2 |
Microbial cell counts in the studied microcosm treatments at the time points of day 0 and day 7.
| Lake | Day 0 | Day 7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. (cells ml−1) | SD (cells ml−1) | Avg. (cells ml−1) | SD (cells mL−1) | |
| EHL | 2.80 × 105 | 6.21 × 103 | 7.76 × 105 | 1.49 × 105 |
| QHL | 6.77 × 105 | 4.35 × 104 | 9.88 × 105 | 1.93 × 105 |
| TSL | 6.86 × 105 | 2.17 × 104 | 9.29 × 105 | 2.17 × 104 |
| GHL | 3.11 × 105 | 8.70 × 104 | 5.81 × 105 | 9.32 × 103 |
| XCDL | 1.05 × 105 | 1.30 × 104 | 4.92 × 106 | 8.54 × 105 |
| CKL | 4.38 × 105 | 7.14 × 104 | 5.82 × 106 | 6.40 × 105 |
Avg. average cell abundance, SD standard deviation.
Fig. 1Microbial community composition variations in the experimental treatments between at the beginning (day 0) and the end (day 7) of the incubation.
Concentrations of DOC in the experimental treatments and their corresponding abiotic controls.
| Lake | Treatment_day 0 | Treatment_day 7 | Abiotic control_day 7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | |
| EHL | 20.05 ± 0.71 | 18.63 ± 0.29 | 19.72 ± 0.07 |
| QHL | 26.39 ± 0.12 | 21.52 ± 0.29 | 26.22 ± 0.06 |
| TSL | 31.35 ± 0.84 | 28.15 ± 0.72 | 31.00 ± 0.50 |
| GHL | 21.35 ± 0.23 | 18.73 ± 0.23 | 21.05 ± 0.17 |
| XCDL | 20.33 ± 0.26 | 18.68 ± 0.06 | 20.16 ± 0.09 |
| CKL | 75.00 ± 1.00 | 68.50 ± 0.50 | 74.50 ± 0.50 |
Avg. average DOC concentration, SD standard deviation.
Fig. 2Difference of DOM molecular composition in the studied lake microcosms.
Venn plots (a) showing the numbers of DOM molecular formulae in each defined category among the studied lakes, and van Krevelen diagrams (b) showing the H/C and O/C ratios of each defined category among the studied lakes.
Fig. 3Networks showing the associations between microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and DOM molecular formulae in the experimental treatments.
(a) showed the topology of the whole networks, and (b) showed the topology of the sub-networks, each representing one identfied module . Size of nodes is proportional to the node degree. For clarity, only the microbial OTU nodes were labeled in the networks.
Fig. 4Roles of the microbial OTUs and molecular formulae identified as the network nodes.