| Literature DB >> 32483305 |
Jian Yang1, Hongchen Jiang2,3, Wen Liu1, Liuqin Huang1, Jianrong Huang1, Beichen Wang1, Hailiang Dong4,5, Rosalie K Chu6, Nikola Tolic6.
Abstract
Lakes receive large amounts of terrestrially derived dissolved organic matter (tEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32483305 PMCID: PMC7608266 DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0689-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Physicochemical conditions of the sampled lake waters.
| Lake | GPS location | Temperature (°C) | Salinity (g l−1) | pH | TDN (mg l−1) | TDP (mg l−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHL | 36°33.4′N/ 100°43.3′E | 10.3 | 1 | 9.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| QHL | 36°33.3′N/ 100°37.5′E | 11.2 | 13 | 9.4 | 4.6 | 0.1 |
| TSL | 37°11.6′N/ 96°53.3′E | 16.1 | 30 | 9.1 | 6.9 | 0.1 |
| GHL | 37°08.2′N/ 97°34.6′E | 9.6 | 90 | 8.6 | 12.5 | 0.1 |
| XCDL | 37°27.2′N/ 95°30.6′E | 9.3 | 126 | 8.6 | 14.9 | 0.1 |
| CKL | 36°45.1′N/ 99°04.8′E | 13.5 | 358 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 0.2 |
Microbial cell counts in the studied microcosm treatments at the time points of day 0 and day 7.
| Lake | Day 0 | Day 7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. (cells ml−1) | SD (cells ml−1) | Avg. (cells ml−1) | SD (cells mL−1) | |
| EHL | 2.80 × 105 | 6.21 × 103 | 7.76 × 105 | 1.49 × 105 |
| QHL | 6.77 × 105 | 4.35 × 104 | 9.88 × 105 | 1.93 × 105 |
| TSL | 6.86 × 105 | 2.17 × 104 | 9.29 × 105 | 2.17 × 104 |
| GHL | 3.11 × 105 | 8.70 × 104 | 5.81 × 105 | 9.32 × 103 |
| XCDL | 1.05 × 105 | 1.30 × 104 | 4.92 × 106 | 8.54 × 105 |
| CKL | 4.38 × 105 | 7.14 × 104 | 5.82 × 106 | 6.40 × 105 |
Avg. average cell abundance, SD standard deviation.
Fig. 1Microbial community composition variations in the experimental treatments between at the beginning (day 0) and the end (day 7) of the incubation.
Concentrations of DOC in the experimental treatments and their corresponding abiotic controls.
| Lake | Treatment_day 0 | Treatment_day 7 | Abiotic control_day 7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | Avg. ± SD(mg l−1) | |
| EHL | 20.05 ± 0.71 | 18.63 ± 0.29 | 19.72 ± 0.07 |
| QHL | 26.39 ± 0.12 | 21.52 ± 0.29 | 26.22 ± 0.06 |
| TSL | 31.35 ± 0.84 | 28.15 ± 0.72 | 31.00 ± 0.50 |
| GHL | 21.35 ± 0.23 | 18.73 ± 0.23 | 21.05 ± 0.17 |
| XCDL | 20.33 ± 0.26 | 18.68 ± 0.06 | 20.16 ± 0.09 |
| CKL | 75.00 ± 1.00 | 68.50 ± 0.50 | 74.50 ± 0.50 |
Avg. average DOC concentration, SD standard deviation.
Fig. 2Difference of DOM molecular composition in the studied lake microcosms.
Venn plots (a) showing the numbers of DOM molecular formulae in each defined category among the studied lakes, and van Krevelen diagrams (b) showing the H/C and O/C ratios of each defined category among the studied lakes.
Fig. 3Networks showing the associations between microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and DOM molecular formulae in the experimental treatments.
(a) showed the topology of the whole networks, and (b) showed the topology of the sub-networks, each representing one identfied module . Size of nodes is proportional to the node degree. For clarity, only the microbial OTU nodes were labeled in the networks.
Fig. 4Roles of the microbial OTUs and molecular formulae identified as the network nodes.