Literature DB >> 32482958

Patient Reported Outcomes in Microbial Keratitis.

Megan M Tuohy1, Leslie M Niziol1, Shazhad I Mian1, Dena Ballouz1, David Bosch2, Maria A Woodward2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to study the patient-reported outcomes of patients with microbial keratitis (MK) using the 9-item National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-9).
METHODS: Using the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative ophthalmology electronic health record repository, patients with MK and control patients who completed the NEI VFQ-9 within 7 days of their appointment were identified. The questionnaire is scored as a mean of the 9 items on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Composite and individual item scores were compared between groups using the analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In total, 916 questionnaires were completed from patients with acute MK (n = 84), nonacute MK (n = 30), MK with a corneal transplant (n = 21), from controls seen in a satellite comprehensive ophthalmology clinic (n = 528), and controls seen at a subspecialty ophthalmology clinic (n = 253). The mean NEI VFQ-9 composite scores per group were 66.6 (SD = 26.8), 78.1 (SD = 17.1), 58.6 (SD =21.6), 88.0 (SD = 10.2), and 83.5 (SD = 13.0), respectively (P < 0.0001). Both patients with acute MK and patients with MK requiring transplant reported significantly worse function than nonacute MK, comprehensive, and specialty patients. Patients with nonacute MK reported significantly worse function than comprehensive control patients (all Tukey-adjusted P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Patients who had or eventually require corneal transplant for management of their MK report worse visual function than patients with nonacute MK. This may be important in helping physicians counsel their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32482958      PMCID: PMC7781206          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   3.152


  25 in total

1.  Impact of cataract surgery on vision-related life performances: the usefulness of Real-Life Vision Test for cataract surgery outcomes evaluation.

Authors:  W Ni; X Li; Z Hou; H Zhang; W Qiu; W Wang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Corneal injuries: incidence and risk factors in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Andreza Werli-Alvarenga; Flávia Falci Ercole; Fernando Antônio Botoni; José Aloísio Dias Massote Mourão Oliveira; Tânia Couto Machado Chianca
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

4.  Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Seasonal, geographic, and antimicrobial resistance patterns in microbial keratitis: 4-year experience in eastern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nina Ni; Enoch M Nam; Kristin M Hammersmith; Parveen K Nagra; Amir A Azari; Benjamin E Leiby; Yang Dai; F Abigail Cabrera; Jenny F Ma; Calvin E Lambert; Stephanie E Honig; Christopher J Rapuano
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract.

Authors:  E P Steinberg; J M Tielsch; O D Schein; J C Javitt; P Sharkey; S D Cassard; M W Legro; M Diener-West; E B Bass; A M Damiano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05

7.  Trends and Associations in Hospitalizations Due to Corneal Ulcers in the United States, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Rachel Lee; Edward E Manche
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  Vision-related quality of life in corneal graft recipients.

Authors:  S T Mak; A C-m Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests.

Authors:  A Carta; L Braccio; M Belpoliti; L Soliani; F Sartore; S A Gandolfi; G Maraini
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status.

Authors:  C M Mangione; R S Phillips; J M Seddon; M G Lawrence; E F Cook; R Dailey; L Goldman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.