| Literature DB >> 32482867 |
Valentina Rotondi1,2,3,4, Ridhi Kashyap5,3,4, Luca Maria Pesando6,7, Simone Spinelli2, Francesco C Billari2,8.
Abstract
For billions of people across the globe, mobile phones enable relatively cheap and effective communication, as well as access to information and vital services on health, education, society, and the economy. Drawing on context-specific evidence on the effects of the digital revolution, this study provides empirical support for the idea that mobile phones are a vehicle for sustainable development at the global scale. It does so by assembling a wealth of publicly available macro- and individual-level data, exploring a wide range of demographic and social development outcomes, and leveraging a combination of methodological approaches. Macro-level analyses covering 200+ countries reveal that mobile-phone access is associated with lower gender inequality, higher contraceptive uptake, and lower maternal and child mortality. Individual-level analyses of survey data from sub-Saharan Africa, linked with detailed geospatial information, further show that women who own a mobile phone are better informed about sexual and reproductive health services and empowered to make independent decisions. Payoffs are larger among the least-developed countries and among the most disadvantaged micro-level clusters. Overall, our findings suggest that boosting mobile-phone access and coverage and closing digital divides, particularly among women, can be powerful tools to attain empowerment-related sustainable development goals, in an ultimate effort to enhance population health and well-being and reduce poverty.Entities:
Keywords: SDGs; gender equality; mobile phones
Year: 2020 PMID: 32482867 PMCID: PMC7306795 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909326117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.ICT penetration worldwide from 1993 to 2017. ICT penetration by world region 1993 to 2017 is shown in . Source: our elaboration from ITU data.
Fig. 2.Global correlations between mobile-phone diffusion and sustainable development outcomes. (Left) Correlations between mobile-phone diffusion and sustainable development outcomes by geographical areas. (Right) Standardized coefficients from univariate models regressing mobile-phone diffusion on sustainable development outcomes by GDP per-capita quintiles. The gray dashed line corresponds to zero, i.e., no association, while the darker and lighter bands surrounding the white circle correspond to the 95 and 90% confidence intervals, respectively. Source: our elaboration from ITU, World Bank, and UN data. Analyses are based on all available data for 209 countries from 1993 to 2017.
Associations between mobile-phone diffusion and sustainable development outcomes, by GDP per-capita quintiles
| 1) | 2) | 3) | 4) | |
| Gender inequality index | Contraceptive prevalence | Maternal mortality | Child mortality | |
| Panel 1: Q1 to Q2 | ||||
| Mobile phone subpopulation/population | −0.146* (0.073) | 0.078** (0.036) | −0.184*** (0.063) | −0.300*** (0.066) |
| Education: low align="center"er sector, 25+ y old | 0.170 (0.244) | 0.207** (0.094) | −0.199 (0.218) | −0.152 (0.357) |
| GDP per capita | −1.682 (1.256) | −0.885 (0.660) | 1.143 (0.927) | −0.624 (0.928) |
| Population density | −2.744 (3.610) | 1.525* (0.801) | 1.577 (1.275) | 1.039 (1.996) |
| N | 194 | 210 | 241 | 243 |
| Within | 0.247 | 0.396 | 0.339 | 0.399 |
| Panel 2: Q3 to Q5 | ||||
| Mobile phone subpopulation/population | −0.099*** (0.020) | 0.058* (0.035) | −0.016** (0.006) | −0.063*** (0.012) |
| Education: lower sector, 25+ y old | −0.286*** (0.071) | 0.018 (0.098) | −0.003 (0.009) | −0.022 (0.019) |
| GDP per capita | −0.161** (0.078) | −0.225 (0.144) | −0.015 (0.010) | −0.041 (0.030) |
| Population density | −0.171* (0.091) | 2.968 (2.178) | 0.032** (0.015) | 0.130*** (0.036) |
| N | 852 | 516 | 911 | 902 |
| Within | 0.559 | 0.089 | 0.160 | 0.447 |
| Panel 3: Overall sample | ||||
| Mobile phone subpopulation/population | −0.102*** (0.020) | 0.062* (0.033) | −0.014** (0.006) | −0.057*** (0.011) |
| to Q2 | −0.008 (0.063) | −0.016 (0.072) | −0.066 (0.048) | 0.022 (0.072) |
| Q1 to Q2 | −0.021 (0.038) | 0.023 (0.044) | −0.162*** (0.058) | −0.267*** (0.063) |
| subpopulation/population | ||||
| Controls | ||||
| N | 1,046 | 726 | 1,152 | 1,145 |
| ;Within | 0.499 | 0.153 | 0.297 | 0.453 |
Panel data fixed-effects models (standardized coefficients) are shown. SEs robust to heteroskedasticity are reported in parentheses. Control variables: educational attainment (lower secondary education, population 25+ y old), GDP per capita, and population density. Time span: 1993 to 2017. Data are linearly interpolated when missing. *P < 0.10, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01.
Fig. 3.Individual-level effects of mobile-phone ownership on sustainable development outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Shown are coefficient estimates for the effect of owning a mobile phone on outcomes related to women’s decision making, knowledge about health-seeking behaviors, and health. Models are estimated on DHS women’s samples from seven sub-Saharan African countries (2015 to 2017). Whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals. Covariates used in the models are education, age, household size, employment status, radio and TV ownership, urban, local development (nightlights). Country and year fixed effects are included. SEs are clustered at the cluster level. The bottom two outcomes (tested for HIV and at least one atenatal visit) are estimates from the subset of women who had at least one birth in the last year and for whom we know that the area in which they live was covered by cellular signal in the year preceding the birth. Source: our elaboration from augmented DHS data.
Fig. 4.Marginal effects of the interaction between mobile-phone ownership and local development. The plots show the marginal effects of the interaction between mobile-phone ownership and local development as proxied by nightlights. Spatial information is converted into a scale (0 to 60, here truncated at 30 for visual purposes) whereby lower values correspond to lower development and higher values correspond to higher development (note that the scale itself does not matter). Source: our elaboration from augmented DHS data.