Literature DB >> 32482477

Why Reintervention After Total Knee Arthroplasty Fails? A Consecutive Cohort of 1170 Surgeries.

Axel Schmidt1, Cécile Batailler1, Timothy Lording2, Roger Badet3, Elvire Servien4, Sébastien Lustig5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze why contemporary reintervention after total knee arthroplasty (RiTKA) fails.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2010, from a multicenter cohort of 1170 RiTKAs, we assessed all failures of RiTKA requiring additional surgery. All indications for the index reintervention were included. The minimum follow-up period was 3 years.
RESULTS: A total of 192 (16.4%) patients required additional surgery after RiTKA (re-reintervention). The mean follow-up period was 7.7 years. Mean age was 69.2 years. The mean time to re-reintervention was 9.6 months with 90.1% of rTKA failure occurring within the first two years. Infection was the main cause of new surgery after RiTKA (47.9%; n = 92/192). Other causes included extensor mechanism pathology (14.6%), stiffness (13.5%), pain (6.8%), aseptic loosening (5.2%), laxity (5.2%), periprosthetic fracture (3.6%), and wound pathology (3.1%). In four groups, the main indication for re-reintervention was recurrence of the pathology leading to the first reintervention: RiTKA for infection (59/355, 16.6%, P < .05), stiffness (18/174, 10.3%, P < .05), extensor mechanism failure (9/167, 5.4%, P < .05), and RiTKA for pain (4/137, 2.9%, P = .003). Global survival curve analysis found 87.9% survivorship without re-reintervention at one year and 83% at eight years.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary RiTKA failures mainly occur in the first two postoperative years. Infection is the main cause of failure in RiTKA. Recurrence of the initial pathology occurs in four groups of RiTKA and is the main indication for re-reintervention in these groups; infection (16.6%), stiffness (10.3%), extensor mechanism failure (5.4%), and pain (2.9%).
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  painful total knee arthroplasty; periprosthetic joint infection; reintervention after TKA; revision arthroplasty failure mode; revision total knee arthroplasty; revision total knee arthroplasty failure

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32482477     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Antibiotics in Bone Cements Used for Prosthesis Fixation: An Efficient Way to Prevent Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Andréa Cara; Mathilde Ballet; Claire Hemery; Tristan Ferry; Frédéric Laurent; Jérôme Josse
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-20

2.  Revision arthroplasty after unicompartimental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nike Walter; Johannes Weber; Maximilian Kerschbaum; Edmund Lau; Steven M Kurtz; Volker Alt; Markus Rupp
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Recent trends in revision knee arthroplasty in Germany.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Nike Walter; Edmund Lau; Michael Worlicek; Steven M Kurtz; Volker Alt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.