Leslie A Hamilton1, Katie J Suda2, R Eric Heidel3, Sharon L K McDonough4, Molly E Hunt5, Andrea S Franks6. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box 117, Knoxville, TN 37920, United States. Electronic address: lhamilt4@uthsc.edu. 2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, United States. Electronic address: ksuda@pitt.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: rheidel@utmck.edu. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, United States. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box 117, Knoxville, TN 37920, United States. Electronic address: huntme0790@gmail.com. 6. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box 117, Knoxville, TN 37920, United States. Electronic address: afranks@uthsc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Student pharmacists have significant exposure to online learning methods in their pre-pharmacy educational experiences. With decreasing resources and faculty shortages in pharmacy education, online delivery of course content is an efficient way to deliver pharmacy curricula while optimizing classroom time for active learning strategies. The purpose of this study was to assess student preferences associated with the utility of online learning methods such as online platforms, social media, and handheld devices. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary 43-question online survey was delivered to students at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States (US). Frequency statistics were used to establish prevalence of student preferences. RESULTS: Overall, 1873 students from 29 schools of pharmacy completed the survey. Of these students, 30% preferred a blended course structure (with online and classroom components) throughout the curriculum, as compared to 47% of students who preferred live lectures exclusively. Approximately 57% of students found smart phones very or extremely valuable for their academic success. Approximately 61% of students reported using their smart phones and 37% reported using their tablets "always" or "often" during the past year for academic activities; however, only 31% of students found paper textbooks very or extremely valuable for their academic success, with approximately 26% using them "always" or "often." CONCLUSIONS: US pharmacy students prefer a blend of traditional classroom and online learning methods. When updating and revising pharmacy curricula, colleges and schools of pharmacy should consider the inclusion of technology and online learning methodologies.
INTRODUCTION: Student pharmacists have significant exposure to online learning methods in their pre-pharmacy educational experiences. With decreasing resources and faculty shortages in pharmacy education, online delivery of course content is an efficient way to deliver pharmacy curricula while optimizing classroom time for active learning strategies. The purpose of this study was to assess student preferences associated with the utility of online learning methods such as online platforms, social media, and handheld devices. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary 43-question online survey was delivered to students at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States (US). Frequency statistics were used to establish prevalence of student preferences. RESULTS: Overall, 1873 students from 29 schools of pharmacy completed the survey. Of these students, 30% preferred a blended course structure (with online and classroom components) throughout the curriculum, as compared to 47% of students who preferred live lectures exclusively. Approximately 57% of students found smart phones very or extremely valuable for their academic success. Approximately 61% of students reported using their smart phones and 37% reported using their tablets "always" or "often" during the past year for academic activities; however, only 31% of students found paper textbooks very or extremely valuable for their academic success, with approximately 26% using them "always" or "often." CONCLUSIONS: US pharmacy students prefer a blend of traditional classroom and online learning methods. When updating and revising pharmacy curricula, colleges and schools of pharmacy should consider the inclusion of technology and online learning methodologies.
Authors: Amer Mahmoud Sindiani; Nail Obeidat; Eman Alshdaifat; Lina Elsalem; Mustafa M Alwani; Hasan Rawashdeh; Ahmad S Fares; Tamara Alalawne; Loai Issa Tawalbeh Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2020-10-02
Authors: Russell H Palmer; Morgan K Moulton; Rebecca H Stone; Devin L Lavender; Michael Fulford; Beth Bryles Phillips Journal: Pharm Pract (Granada) Date: 2022-03-07