| Literature DB >> 32481535 |
Heejin Kim1, Ki Hong Kim2, Ki Jeong Hong2, Yunseo Ku3, Sang Do Shin2, Hee Chan Kim4.
Abstract
Monitoring cerebral circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential to improve patients' prognosis and quality of life. We assessed the feasibility of non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) parameters as predictive factors of cerebral resuscitation in a ventricular fibrillation (VF) swine model. After 1 min untreated VF, four cycles of basic life support were performed and the first defibrillation was administered. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was confirmed if a palpable pulse persisted for 20 min. Otherwise, one cycle of advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) and defibrillation were administered immediately. Successfully defibrillated animals were continuously monitored. If sustained ROSC was not achieved, another cycle of ACLS was administered. Non-ROSC was confirmed when sustained ROSC did not occur after 10 ACLS cycles. EEG and hemodynamic parameters were measured during experiments. Data measured for approximately 3 s right before the defibrillation attempts were analyzed to investigate the relationship between the recovery of carotid blood flow (CBF) and non-invasive EEG parameters, including time- and frequency-domain parameters and entropy indices. We found that time-domain magnitude and entropy measures of EEG correlated with the change of CBF. Further studies are warranted to evaluate these EEG parameters as potential markers of cerebral circulation during CPR.Entities:
Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); carotid blood flow (CBF); cerebral circulation; electroencephalogram (EEG); hemodynamic data
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32481535 PMCID: PMC7313692 DOI: 10.3390/s20113052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experimental setup: (a) LUCAS2 chest compression system installed on the chest of animals; (b) A single-channel electroencephalography (EEG) device mounted on the forehead.
Figure 2The entire test scenario: (a) flow chart from surgical procedure to basic life support (BLS), advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS), and termination; (b) brief timeline of the test protocol.
EEG parameters considered in this study.
| EEG Parameters | Definition | Domain |
|---|---|---|
| Magnitude | Maximal Amplitude during the Epoch (unit: µV) | Time |
| SynchFastSlow | log(B0.5–47 Hz/B40–47 Hz) | Frequency |
| BetaR | log(P30–47 Hz/P11–20 Hz) | Frequency |
| DeltaR | log(P8–20 Hz/P1–4 Hz) | Frequency |
| AlphaPR | P8–13 Hz/P0.5–47 Hz | Frequency |
| BetaPR | P13–30 Hz/P0.5–47 Hz | Frequency |
| DeltaPR | P0.5–4 Hz/P0.5–47 Hz | Frequency |
| ThetaPR | P4–8 Hz/P0.5–47 Hz | Frequency |
| BG_Alpha+ | P8–47 Hz/P0.5–47 Hz | Frequency |
| Log energy entropy |
| Entropy |
| Rényi entropy |
| Entropy |
Abbreviation: Pa–b Hz, the sum of spectral power from a–b Hz; Ba–b Hz, the sum of bispectral activity from a–b Hz; , probability distribution function of signal ; of Rényi entropy was 0.5.
Figure 3Comparison of EEG over time between return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and non-ROSC cases: (a) EEG waveforms obtained from animals with successful defibrillation after fourth BLS session and sustained ROSC confirmed after follow-up monitoring for 20 min (Test 6); (b) EEG waveforms obtained from animals in which ROSC was not achieved until the end of experiment (Test 5). Dashed lines denote the level of ±5 µV, the limits of the isoelectric state.
Pearson correlation coefficients between EEG parameters and the recovery rates of CBF.
| EEG Parameters | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Magnitude | 0.778 | <0.001 |
| SynchFastSlow | 0.210 | 0.228 |
| BetaR | −0.329 | 0.016 |
| DeltaR | 0.196 | 0.032 |
| AlphaPR | 0.189 | 0.048 |
| BetaPR | 0.323 | 0.001 |
| DeltaPR | 0.032 | 0.797 |
| ThetaPR | −0.354 | 0.004 |
| BG_Alpha+ | 0.262 | 0.006 |
| Log energy entropy | 0.781 | <0.001 |
| Rényi entropy | 0.784 | <0.001 |
Figure 4Scatter plots between EEG parameters and the recovery of CBF. Correlation coefficients were denoted above the plots: (a) magnitude; (b) log energy entropy; (c) Rényi entropy.
Figure 5Results of one-way ANOVA: (a) magnitude; (b) log energy entropy; (c) Rényi entropy. Asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance at the p < 0.001 level. Error bars indicate the upper and lower extreme values of the data.
Results of multiple comparisons between groups in three EEG parameters.
| Magnitude | Log Energy Entropy | Rényi Entropy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I/ | Mean Difference/ | Mean Difference/ | Mean Difference/ | |
| 1 | 2 | −10.39/1.24 | −1375.15/164.65 | −2.69/0.319 |
| 1 | 3 | −13.34/1.37 | −1590.42/164.87 | −3.13/0.321 |
| 1 | 4 | −15.15/2.39 | −1720.80/190.02 | −3.38/0.434 |
| 2 | 3 | −2.95/1.30 | −215.27/87.24 | −0.442/0.171 |
| 2 | 4 | −4.75/2.35 | −345.65/128.60 | −0.695/0.338 |
| 3 | 4 | −1.80/2.41 | −130.39/128.87 | −0.253/0.340 |
Differences were obtained by Group I minus Group II.
Figure 6Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (blue) for three EEG parameters: (a) magnitude; (b) log energy entropy; (c) Rényi entropy. Red dots indicate the optimal cut-off points, and the diagonal lines (green) indicate random chance.
Results of the ROC curve analysis for EEG parameters.
| EEG Parameter | AUC | Standard | True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) | False | Cut-off Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnitude | 0.904 | 0.033 | 0.889 | 0.244 | 12.802 |
| Log energy entropy | 0.896 | 0.035 | 0.833 | 0.211 | 739.543 |
| Rényi entropy | 0.885 | 0.037 | 0.861 | 0.263 | 8.919 |
Abbreviation AUC: Area under the curve.