Literature DB >> 32480555

Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV.

Tao Duan1, Bangyou Zheng1, Wei Guo2, Seishi Ninomiya2, Yan Guo3, Scott C Chapman1.   

Abstract

Ground cover is an important physiological trait affecting crop radiation capture, water-use efficiency and grain yield. It is challenging to efficiently measure ground cover with reasonable precision for large numbers of plots, especially in tall crop species. Here we combined two image-based methods to estimate plot-level ground cover for three species, from either an ortho-mosaic or undistorted (i.e. corrected for lens and camera effects) images captured by cameras using a low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Reconstructed point clouds and ortho-mosaics for the whole field were created and a customised image processing workflow was developed to (1) segment the 'whole-field' datasets into individual plots, and (2) 'reverse-calculate' each plot from each undistorted image. Ground cover for individual plots was calculated by an efficient vegetation segmentation algorithm. For 79% of plots, estimated ground cover was greater from the ortho-mosaic than from images, particularly when plants were small, or when older/taller in large plots. While there was a good agreement between the ground cover estimates from ortho-mosaic and images when the target plot was positioned at a near-nadir view near the centre of image (cotton: R2=0.97, sorghum: R2=0.98, sugarcane: R2=0.84), ortho-mosaic estimates were 5% greater than estimates from these near-nadir images. Because each plot appeared in multiple images, there were multiple estimates of the ground cover, some of which should be excluded, e.g. when the plot is near edge within an image. Considering only the images with near-nadir view, the reverse calculation provides a more precise estimate of ground cover compared with the ortho-mosaic. The methodology is suitable for high throughput phenotyping for applications in agronomy, physiology and breeding for different crop species and can be extended to provide pixel-level data from other types of cameras including thermal and multi-spectral models.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 32480555     DOI: 10.1071/FP16123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Plant Biol        ISSN: 1445-4416            Impact factor:   3.101


  9 in total

1.  Quantification of light interception within image-based 3-D reconstruction of sole and intercropped canopies over the entire growth season.

Authors:  Binglin Zhu; Fusang Liu; Ziwen Xie; Yan Guo; Baoguo Li; Yuntao Ma
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Estimation of maize plant height and leaf area index dynamics using an unmanned aerial vehicle with oblique and nadir photography.

Authors:  Yingpu Che; Qing Wang; Ziwen Xie; Long Zhou; Shuangwei Li; Fang Hui; Xiqing Wang; Baoguo Li; Yuntao Ma
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  High-throughput field crop phenotyping: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Seishi Ninomiya
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.014

4.  Land-based crop phenotyping by image analysis: consistent canopy characterization from inconsistent field illumination.

Authors:  Joshua Chopin; Pankaj Kumar; Stanley J Miklavcic
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.993

Review 5.  Genebank Phenomics: A Strategic Approach to Enhance Value and Utilization of Crop Germplasm.

Authors:  Giao N Nguyen; Sally L Norton
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29

6.  Haplotype analysis from unmanned aerial vehicle imagery of rice MAGIC population for the trait dissection of biomass and plant architecture.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogawa; Toshihiro Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tsunematsu; Noriko Kanno; Yasunori Nonoue; Jun-Ichi Yonemaru
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Impact of Varying Light and Dew on Ground Cover Estimates from Active NDVI, RGB, and LiDAR.

Authors:  David M Deery; David J Smith; Robert Davy; Jose A Jimenez-Berni; Greg J Rebetzke; Richard A James
Journal:  Plant Phenomics       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Large-scale field phenotyping using backpack LiDAR and CropQuant-3D to measure structural variation in wheat.

Authors:  Yulei Zhu; Gang Sun; Guohui Ding; Jie Zhou; Mingxing Wen; Shichao Jin; Qiang Zhao; Joshua Colmer; Yanfeng Ding; Eric S Ober; Ji Zhou
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Automatic Microplot Localization Using UAV Images and a Hierarchical Image-Based Optimization Method.

Authors:  Sara Mardanisamani; Tewodros W Ayalew; Minhajul Arifin Badhon; Nazifa Azam Khan; Gazi Hasnat; Hema Duddu; Steve Shirtliffe; Sally Vail; Ian Stavness; Mark Eramian
Journal:  Plant Phenomics       Date:  2021-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.