Literature DB >> 32479965

A spatial model for nutrient mitigation potential of blue mussel farms in the western Baltic Sea.

Andreas Holbach1, Marie Maar2, Karen Timmermann3, Daniel Taylor4.   

Abstract

Worldwide, coastal and marine policies are increasingly aiming for environmental protection, and eutrophication is a global challenge, particularly impairing near-coastal marine water bodies. In this context, mussel mitigation aquaculture is currently considered an effective tool to extract nutrients from such water bodies. Mussel mitigation farming using longline systems with loops of collector material is a well-developed technology and considered promising in the western Baltic Sea. Besides several spatially limited field studies, a suitable spatial model for site-specific implementation is still lacking. In this study, we present a modular spatial model, consisting of a spatial and temporal habitat factor model (Module 1), blue mussel growth model (Module 2), mussel farm model (Module 3), and an avoidance of food limitation model (Module 4). The modules integrate data from in situ monitoring, mussel growth experiments, and eco-physiological modelling for the western Baltic Sea, to estimate spatially explicit nutrient reduction potentials. The model is flexible with respect to farm setups and harvest times and considers natural variability, model uncertainty, and required hydrodynamics. Modelling results proved valid at all scales and modules, and point out key areas for efficient mussel mitigation farms in Danish, German and Swedish areas. Modelled long-term mean mitigation potentials for harvest in November reach up to 0.88 tN/ha and 0.05 tP/ha for a farm setup using 2 m depth-range of the water column and 3.0 tN/ha and 0.17 tP/ha using up to 8 m, respectively. For Danish water bodies, we demonstrate that in efficient areas, mitigation farms (18.8 ha, 90 km collector substrate in loops with 2 m depth-range) required <3.6% of the space to extract the target nitrogen loads for good ecological status. The developed approach could prove valuable for implementing environmental policies in aquatic systems, e.g. in situ nutrient mitigation, aquaculture spatial planning, and habitat suitability mapping.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coastal and marine policy; DEB-model; Geostatistical modelling; Habitat factor model; Marine mitigation measures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479965     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Comparing life history traits and tolerance to changing environments of two oyster species (Ostrea edulis and Crassostrea gigas) through Dynamic Energy Budget theory.

Authors:  Brecht Stechele; Marie Maar; Jeroen Wijsman; Dimitry Van der Zande; Steven Degraer; Peter Bossier; Nancy Nevejan
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  -Blue mussel (Mytilus spp.) cultivation in mesohaline eutrophied inner coastal waters: mitigation potential, threats and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Lukas Ritzenhofen; Anna-Lucia Buer; Greta Gyraite; Sven Dahlke; Annemarie Klemmstein; Gerald Schernewski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.