Literature DB >> 32479829

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation.
FINDINGS: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28-2·40], p<0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65-3·22], p<0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3-5 versus grades 1-2 (2·35 [1·57-3·53], p<0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01-2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06-2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01-2·31], p=0·047).
INTERPRETATION: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479829      PMCID: PMC7259900          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has now spread to most countries, with WHO declaring a COVID-19 pandemic on March 11, 2020. The pandemic has tested the resilience of health-care systems, including hospitals, which were largely unprepared for the scale of the pandemic. Patients having surgery are a vulnerable group at risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in hospital and might be particularly susceptible to subsequent pulmonary complications, due to the pro-inflammatory cytokine and immunosuppressive responses to surgery and mechanical ventilation.3, 4 Evidence of the safety of performing surgery in SARS-CoV-2-exposed hospitals is urgently needed. Before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, high-quality, multinational observational studies established overall baseline rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (up to 10%) and subsequent mortality (up to 3%) after surgery.5, 6, 7 With initiatives such as the UK's National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), mortality was improving even in high-risk groups. Guidelines have been published for the management of surgical patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic,9, 10, 11 but they are based solely on expert opinion. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality needs to be established in order to enable surgeons and patients to make evidence-based decisions during the pandemic. This study reports the clinical outcomes of patients who had surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the impact of pulmonary complications. Evidence before this study We searched PubMed and Embase on March 15, 2020, for studies reporting on surgical patients during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We used the search terms “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “coronavirus”, and “pandemic”, in combination with “surgery”, and applied no language or date restrictions. We identified 13 articles (12 from China and one from Singapore), all of which provided clinical guidance, with none reporting patient-level outcomes. Added value of this study This international, observational, cohort study provides cross-specialty, patient-level outcomes data for patients who had surgery and acquired perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. 1128 patients were included across 24 countries. Overall 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128 patients). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) patients; these patients accounted for 82·6% (219 of 265) of all deaths. Independent risk factors for mortality were male sex, age 70 years or older, American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5, surgery for malignant disease, emergency surgery, and major surgery. Implications of all the available evidence Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. These pulmonary complication and mortality rates are greater than those reported for even the highest-risk patients before the pandemic. Thresholds for surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice; men aged 70 years and older who have emergency or major elective surgery are at particularly high risk of mortality. Consideration should be given for postponing non-critical procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. When hospitals recommence routine surgery, this will be in hospital environments that remain exposed to SARS-CoV-2, so strategies should be developed to reduce in-hospital SARS-CoV-2 transmission and mitigate the risk of postoperative complications.

Methods

Study design

We did an international, multicentre, observational cohort study in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who had surgery at 235 hospitals in 24 countries (appendix p 10). Data release and ethical considerations were discussed with an independent data monitoring and ethics committee. We collected only routine, anonymised data with no change to clinical care pathways. In the UK, the study was registered at each site as either a clinical audit or service evaluation; at the lead centre (University Hospital Birmingham) it was approved as clinical audit, with registration CARMS-15986. In other countries, local principal investigators were responsible for contacting competent research ethics committees to obtain local or national approvals in line with applicable regulations, as well as seeking approvals from data protection officers. In some participating hospitals, informed patient consent was taken, whereas in other countries the requirement for patient consent was waived by local research ethics committees.

Participants

Each participating hospital included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. Surgery was defined as any procedure done by a surgeon in an operating theatre under general, regional, or local anaesthesia. Patients undergoing surgery for any indication were eligible, including benign disease, cancer, trauma, and obstetrics. The study included children and adults, but individual hospitals had the option to apply local age cutoffs, if appropriate. If patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection had multiple operations, the procedure closest to the time of confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as the index procedure. Participating hospitals prospectively screened patients for eligibility to ensure that all patients fulfilling eligibility criteria were captured. However, the study was initiated after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had peaked in some regions, so retrospective data collection was permitted if collaborators were able to identify and include all eligible patients. The importance of working across surgical specialties to identify all eligible patients was highlighted in site training, because incomplete case ascertainment could introduce bias, if patients with less severe disease were missed. Site investigators were provided with a range of written materials setting out possible strategies to capture consecutive eligible patients. In addition, investigators were invited to join social media groups and teleconferences for the purpose of troubleshooting site-specific recruitment issues and shared learning.

Procedures

Laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on viral RNA detection by quantitative RT-PCR. Sampling, including nasal swabs or bronchoalveolar lavage, and analyses were done according to individual hospital protocols. As quantitative RT-PCR testing was not available at all participating hospitals, patients were also included based on either clinical or radiological findings. Clinical diagnosis consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection was made by a senior physician and based on clinical presentation of symptoms highly indicative of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including cough, fever, and myalgia. Radiological diagnosis was based on thorax CT, in keeping with locally implemented protocols. All patients included initially based on clinical or radiological criteria who subsequently had laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection and returned a negative result were excluded from the study. Data were collected online using the Research Electronic Data Capture web application. Demographic variables recorded included age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification. Age was collected as a categorical variable by deciles of age. ASA at the time of surgery was analysed as grades 1–2 versus grades 3–5. The timing of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was recorded as either preoperative or postoperative. Clinical symptoms present at the time of hospital admission were recorded for emergency admissions. Physiological variables recorded (respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood pressure) were based on readings taken immediately before surgery. The quick sequential organ failure assessment score was calculated on the basis of individual variables recorded immediately before surgery. Operative variables included urgency (elective or emergency surgery), primary procedure completed, and anaesthesia used (local, regional, or general). Emergency surgery was defined as procedures classified by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death as immediate, urgent, or expedited. Grade of surgery was categorised on the basis of the Bupa schedule of procedures as either minor (minor or intermediate according to the Bupa schedule) or major (major or complex major according to the Bupa schedule). Before locking of the dataset for analysis, the senior local principal investigator for each hospital was asked to confirm data completeness and that all eligible patients had been entered into the database.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, with the day of surgery defined as day 0. The key secondary outcome measure was the rate of pulmonary complications, a composite outcome adapted from the Prevention of Respiratory Insufficiency after Surgical Management trial.15, 16 Pulmonary complications were defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or unexpected postoperative ventilation; these are the most frequent COVID-19-related pulmonary complications in medical patients. Unexpected postoperative ventilation was defined as either any episode of non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after initial extubation after surgery; or patient could not be extubated as planned after surgery. Additional secondary outcomes included pulmonary embolism, intensive care unit admission, reoperation, 7-day mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Statistical analysis

The study was done according to STROBE guidelines for observational studies. Continuous data were tested for distribution, with normally distributed data presented as mean and 95% CI, and differences between groups were tested using the unpaired t test. The χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical data. Missing data were included in flowcharts and descriptive analyses, allowing denominators to remain consistent in calculations. Multilevel logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Models included factors that occurred before the outcome of interest. Country was included as a random effect with hospital nested within country, in both the unadjusted and adjusted models. The primary adjusted model included preoperative variables to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. Secondary models identified predictors of 7-day mortality and pulmonary complications. Sensitivity analyses were done, including only patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; and only patients with preoperatively confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analyses were done using Stata, version 15.1 for Mac.

Role of the funding source

The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author and analysis group had full access to all the data in the study and the corresponding author and the writing committee had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Results

At the time of analysis (May 2, 2020), 30-day follow-up had been reached for 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020. 605 (53·6%) of 1128 patients were men and 523 (46·4%) were women, 214 (19·0%) were younger than 50 years, 353 (31·3%) were aged 50–69 years, and 558 (49·5%) were aged 70 years or older, with age missing for three patients (table 1).
Table 1

Baseline and demographic characteristics

30-day mortality
Pulmonary complications
No (n=845)Yes (n=268)p valueNo (n=526)Yes (n=577)p value
Age....<0·0001....0·00023
<29 years56 (100%)0..39 (70·9%)16 (29·1%)..
30–49 years146 (94·2%)9 (5·8%)..86 (55·8%)68 (44·2%)..
50–69 years277 (79·8%)70 (20·2%)..159 (46·0%)187 (54·0%)..
≥70 years364 (65·9%)188 (34·1%)..240 (44·0%)305 (56·0%)..
Missing21..21..
Sex....<0·0001....0·0028
Male424 (71·1%)172 (28·9%)..252 (42·8%)337 (57·2%)..
Female417 (81·6%)94 (18·4%)..270 (53·1%)238 (46·9%)..
Ambiguous1 (50·0%)1 (50·0%)..1 (50·0%)1 (50·0%)..
Missing31..31..
American Society of Anesthesiologists grade....<0·0001....<0·0001
1–2344 (88·4%)45 (11·6%)..235 (60·6%)153 (39·4%)..
3–5475 (68·7%)216 (31·3%)..278 (40·6%)407 (59·4%)..
Missing267..1317..
Number of comorbidities....<0·0001....0·00017
None107 (93·0%)8 (7·0%)..73 (63·5%)42 (36·5%)..
One192 (82·8%)40 (17·2%)..115 (50·7%)112 (49·3%)..
Two or more527 (70·8%)217 (29·2%)..322 (43·5%)418 (56·5%)..
Missing193..165..
Comorbidities
Current smoker80 (75·5%)26 (24·5%)0·90942 (40·0%)63 (60·0%)0·097
Asthma57 (73·1%)21 (26·9%)0·54236 (48·0%)39 (52·0%)0·955
Cancer146 (77·2%)43 (22·8%)0·63992 (48·9%)96 (51·1%)0·707
Chronic kidney disease109 (66·5%)55 (33·5%)0·002264 (39·3%)99 (60·7%)0·020
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease75 (64·7%)41 (35·3%)0·002744 (37·9%)72 (62·1%)0·026
Congestive heart failure55 (64·7%)30 (35·3%)0·01229 (34·5%)55 (65·5%)0·012
Dementia48 (55·2%)39 (44·8%)<0·000130 (35·3%)55 (64·7%)0·017
Diabetes207 (73·9%)73 (26·1%)0·367124 (44·1%)157 (55·9%)0·166
Hypertension399 (71·0%)163 (29·0%)0·00010253 (45·3%)305 (54·7%)0·114
Myocardial infarction70 (63·1%)41 (36·9%)0·0008439 (35·4%)71 (64·6%)0·0068
Peripheral vascular disease67 (62·0%)41 (38·0%)0·0003848 (44·4%)60 (55·6%)0·477
Stoke or transient ischaemic attack55 (61·1%)35 (38·9%)0·0006145 (50·0%)45 (50·0%)0·647
Symptoms at admission*
No symptoms reported111 (77·6%)32 (22·4%)0·28178 (56·5%)60 (43·5%)0·020
Symptoms reported499 (73·3%)182 (26·7%)..309 (45·6%)368 (54·4%)..
Abdominal pain193 (77·5%)56 (22·5%)0·134122 (49·4%)125 (50·6%)0·472
Dyspnoea83 (61·9%)51 (38·1%)0·0004932 (23·9%)102 (76·1%)<0·0001
Cough108 (73·0%)40 (27·0%)0·74655 (37·2%)93 (62·8%)0·0054
Diarrhoea18 (69·2%)8 (30·8%)0·57112 (46·2%)14 (53·8%)0·890
Fatigue42 (70·0%)18 (30·0%)0·46018 (30·0%)42 (70·0%)0·0048
Fever >38°C177 (76·6%)54 (23·4%)0·28994 (40·9%)136 (59·1%)0·018
Haemoptysis2 (66·7%)1 (33·3%)0·7711 (33·3%)2 (66·7%)0·623
Myalgia27 (79·4%)7 (20·6%)0·4659 (26·5%)25 (73·5%)0·012
Nausea or vomiting100 (79·4%)26 (20·6%)0·13862 (49·6%)63 (50·4%)0·607
Sputum7 (41·2%)10 (58·8%)0·00186 (35·3%)11 (64·7%)0·309
Other209 (70·6%)87 (29·4%)0·094139 (47·3%)155 (52·7%)0·930
Preoperative respiratory support
None or oxygen only805 (76·4%)249 (23·6%)0·134520 (49·7%)526 (50·3%)<0·0001
Non-invasive ventilation12 (80·0%)3 (20·0%)0·7101 (6·7%)14 (93·3%)0·0014
Invasive ventilation31 (66·0%)16 (34·0%)0·1032 (4·3%)45 (95·7%)<0·0001
Last available values before surgery
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg129·0 (22·6)131·7 (26·0)0·118129·9 (22·0)129·7 (24·6)0·896
Respiratory rate, rpm18·1 (5·5)18·7 (8·8)0·21117·5 (5·6)18·9 (7·1)0·0013
Heart rate, bpm85·0 (18·3)83·0 (19·0)0·13083·4 (16·9)85·3 (19·6)0·081
qSOFA score....0·011....<0·0001
0572 (76·3%)178 (23·7%)..382 (51·3%)362 (48·7%)..
1155 (77·5%)45 (22·5%)..73 (36·7%)126 (63·3%)..
≥237 (59·7%)25 (40·3%)..9 (14·8%)52 (82·2%)..
Missing8120..6237..

Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113%) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103%). Percentages are presented in rows. bpm=beats per min. qSOFA=quick sequential organ failure assessment. rpm=breaths per minutes.

Data only presented for emergency patients.

Data presented as mean with SD.

Baseline and demographic characteristics Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113%) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103%). Percentages are presented in rows. bpm=beats per min. qSOFA=quick sequential organ failure assessment. rpm=breaths per minutes. Data only presented for emergency patients. Data presented as mean with SD. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) of 1128 patients and postoperatively in 806 (71·5%), with timing of diagnosis missing for 28 patients. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was confirmed by laboratory testing in 969 (85·9%) patients, radiological findings in 80 (7·1%), and clinical findings in 68 (6·0%), with method of diagnosis missing for 11 patients. Overall, 357 (31·6%) had preoperative thorax CT and the most common radiological finding was ground glass opacity (table 2).
Table 2

Preoperative assessment

30-day mortality
Pulmonary complications
No (n=845)Yes (n=268)p valueNo (n=526)Yes (n=577)p value
Haemoglobin, g/L*118·6 (24·7)116·1 (24·1)0·150118·5 (23·5)117·6 (25·4)0·537
Missing184..157..
White blood cell count, ×109 per L*10·5 (7·6)10·6 (6·8)0·85910·1 (5·1)10·8 (8·9)0·169
Missing194..158..
Preoperative chest x-ray....0·0041....<0·0001
Not performed320 (79·4%)83 (20·6%)..232 (58·0%)168 (42·0%)..
Yes: normal321 (77·4%)94 (22·6%)..205 (49·8%)207 (50·2%)..
Yes: abnormal199 (68·9%)90 (31·1%)..84 (29·4%)202 (70·6%)..
Missing51..50..
Preoperative thorax CT
Not performed598 (78·1%)168 (21·9%)0·013376 (49·5%)384 (50·5%)0·077
Performed: normal96 (75·0%)32 (25·0%)0·79660 (47·6%)66 (52·4%)0·987
Performed: consolidation44 (75·9%)14 (24·14%)0·99123 (39·7%)35 (60·3%)0·208
Performed: ground glass opacity57 (71·3%)23 (28·7%)0·31031 (39·2%)48 (60·8%)0·119
Performed: pulmonary infiltration27 (67·5%)13 (32·5%)0·20513 (33·3%)26 (66·7%)0·068
Performed: other abnormality50 (61·0%)32 (39·0%)0·001030 (37·0%)51 (63·0%)0·046
SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis....0·719....0·085
Laboratory confirmed727 (76·0%)230 (24·0%)..454 (47·9%)493 (52·1%)..
Radiological (CT thorax)58 (72·5%)22 (27·5%)..29 (36·3%)51 (63·7%)..
Clinical53 (77·9%)15 (22·1%)..36 (52·9%)32 (47·1%)..
Missing71..71..
Timing of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis....0·128....0·155
Preoperative231 (78·8%)62 (21·2%)..148 (51·0%)142 (49·0%)..
Postoperative595 (74·4%)205 (25·6%)..367 (46·2%)428 (53·8%)..
Missing191..117..

Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103). Percentages are presented in rows. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Last available blood test results from before surgery, presented as mean with SD.

Preoperative assessment Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103). Percentages are presented in rows. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Last available blood test results from before surgery, presented as mean with SD. Emergency surgery was done in 835 (74·0%) of 1128 patients and elective surgery in 280 (24·8%; table 3), with urgency missing for 13 patients. Indications for surgery were benign disease in 615 (54·5%), cancer in 278 (24·6%), and trauma in 227 (20·1%), with indication missing for eight patients. 251 (22·3%) procedures were categorised as minor and 841 (74·6%) as major, with grade of surgery missing for 36 patients. Procedures included gastrointestinal and general (373 [33·1%]), orthopaedic (302 [26·8%]), cardiothoracic (86 [7·6%]), hepatobiliary (62 [5·5%]), obstetric (51 [4·5%]), vascular (45 [4·0%]), head and neck (40 [3·5%]), neurosurgery (39 [3·5%]), urological (37 [3·3%]), and other (58 [5·1%]) surgeries. Procedure type was missing for 36 patients. A full breakdown of procedures is in the appendix (pp 11–14).
Table 3

Operative details

30-day mortality
Pulmonary complications
No (n=845)Yes (n=268)p valueNo (n=526)Yes (n=577)p value
Urgency of surgery....0·020....0·873
Elective225 (80·9%)53 (19·1%)..130 (46·9%)147 (53·1%)..
Emergency610 (74·0%)214 (26·0%)..387 (47·5%)428 (52·5%)..
Missing101..92..
Anaesthesia....0·383....0·488
Local34 (69·4%)15 (30·6%)..24 (49·0%)25 (51·0%)..
Regional119 (78·8%)32 (21·2%)..78 (51·7%)73 (48·3%)..
General658 (75·2%)217 (24·8%)..403 (46·5%)464 (53·5%)..
Missing344..2115..
Surgical diagnosis....0·030....0·502
Benign or obstetric case480 (78·3%)133 (21·7%)..281 (46·3%)326 (53·7%)..
Cancer183 (72·9%)68 (27·1%)..114 (45·6%)136 (54·4%)..
Trauma157 (70·1%)67 (29·9%)..112 (50·5%)110 (49·6%)..
Missing250..195..
Grade of surgery....0·00055....0·022
Minor209 (83·6%)41 (16·4%)..132 (53·2%)116 (46·8%)..
Major607 (72·9%)226 (27·1%)..372 (45·0%)455 (55·0%)..
Missing291..226..
Specialty....<0·0001....<0·0001
Breast3 (100·0%)0 (0%)..2 (66·6%)1 (33·3%)..
Cardiac33 (66·0%)17 (34·0%)..3 (5·9%)48 (94·1%)..
Gastrointestinal and general286 (76·9%)86 (23·1%)..172 (46·4%)199 (53·6%)..
Gynaecology20 (95·2%)1 (4·8%)..16 (76·2%)5 (23·8%)..
Head and neck32 (80·0%)8 (20·0%)..10 (25·6%)29 (74·4%)..
Hepatobiliary50 (84·8%)9 (15·2%)..29 (50·9%)28 (49·1%)..
Neurosurgery31 (81·6%)7 (18·4%)..19 (50·0%)19 (50·0%)..
Obstetrics50 (98·0%)1 (2·0%)..26 (51·0%)25 (49·0%)..
Ophthalmology4 (100·0%)0 (0%)..3 (75·0%)1 (25·0%)..
Orthopaedics213 (71·2%)86 (28·8%)..165 (55·7%)131 (44·3%)..
Other19 (73·1%)7 (26·9%)..11 (42·3%)15 (57·7%)..
Plastic and reconstructive3 (100·0%)0 (0%)..1 (33·3%)2 (66·7%)..
Thoracic20 (57·1%)15 (42·9%)..12 (34·3%)23 (65·7%)..
Urology25 (67·6%)12 (32·4%)..15 (42·3%)20 (57·1%)..
Vascular27 (60·0%)18 (40·0%)..20 (44·4%)25 (55·6%)..
Missing29 (96·7%)1 (3·3%)..22 (78·6%)6 (21·4%)..

Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103). Percentages are presented in rows.

Operative details Data only presented for patients with 30-day mortality outcome available (n=1113) and pulmonary complications outcome available (n=1103). Percentages are presented in rows. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Men had higher 30-day mortality than women (28·4% [172 of 605] vs 18·2% [94 of 517], p<0·0001). Patients aged 70 years or older had higher mortality than patients younger than 70 years (33·7% [188 of 558] vs 13·9% [79 of 567], p<0·0001). Mortality was higher after emergency surgery (25·6% [214 of 835]) than elective surgery (18·9% [53 of 280]; p=0·023; figure 1). Men had higher mortality rates than women, and men and women aged 70 years or older had higher rates than those younger than 70 years (figure 2).
Figure 1

30-day mortality rates by timing of surgery and development of pulmonary complications

Patients with missing data are included in denominators (appendix p 21). Pulmonary complications are pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Figure 2

30-day mortality rates by patient subgroup

Grade of surgery was classified based on the Bupa Schedule as either minor (minor or intermediate in Bupa Schedule) or major (major or complex major in Bupa Schedule).

30-day mortality rates by timing of surgery and development of pulmonary complications Patients with missing data are included in denominators (appendix p 21). Pulmonary complications are pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. 30-day mortality rates by patient subgroup Grade of surgery was classified based on the Bupa Schedule as either minor (minor or intermediate in Bupa Schedule) or major (major or complex major in Bupa Schedule). In adjusted analyses (figure 3; appendix p 15), predictors of 30-day mortality were male sex (OR 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p<0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p<0·0001), ASA grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p<0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52, [1·01–2·31], p=0·047).
Figure 3

Adjusted model of predictors for 30-day mortality

1037 patients with complete data were included in the adjusted model. Of the patients excluded because of missing data, seven had died and 84 patients had not died at 30 days. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. *Adjusted odds ratio reported per unit increase in white blood cell count (×109).

Adjusted model of predictors for 30-day mortality 1037 patients with complete data were included in the adjusted model. Of the patients excluded because of missing data, seven had died and 84 patients had not died at 30 days. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. *Adjusted odds ratio reported per unit increase in white blood cell count (×109). 7-day mortality was 5·2% (59 of 1128; table 4). In adjusted analyses (appendix p 16), having ASA grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 was associated with increased odds of 7-day mortality (OR 2·52 [95% CI 1·10–5·77], p<0·029), whereas postoperative diagnosis was associated with decreased risk (0·25 [0·13–0·46], p<0·0001).
Table 4

Postoperative outcomes

Urgency
Grade of surgery
Elective (n=280)Emergency (n=835)p valueMinor (n=251)Major (n=841)p value
Mortality
7-day7 (2·5%)52 (6·2%)0·0158 (3·2%)51 (6·1%)0·074
30-day53 (18·9%)214 (25·6%)0·02041 (16·3%)226 (26·9%)0·00055
Missing2 (0·7%)11 (1·3%)..1 (0·4%)8 (1·0%)..
Pulmonary complications
Composite of pulmonary complications147 (52·5%)428 (51·3%)0·873116 (46·2%)455 (54·1%)0·022
Pneumonia118 (42·1%)334 (40·0%)0·52794 (37·5%)355 (42·2%)0·178
Acute respiratory distress syndrome41 (14·6%)119 (14·3%)0·87233 (13·2%)127 (15·1%)0·442
Unexpected postoperative ventilation....0·262....0·160
Non-invasive ventilation2331..1241..
Invasive ventilation40156..41153..
Missing321..414..
Duration of invasive ventilation....0·049....0·023
1–23 h1632..741..
24–47 h527..328..
48–71 h221..320..
≥72 h1779..2966..
Missing240676..209686..
Pulmonary embolism
30-day4 (1·4%)18 (2·2%)0·4498 (3·2%)14 (1·7%)0·132
Missing321..414..
Postoperative intensive care unit admission....0·0034....0·177
None158 (56·4%)570 (68·3%)..177 (70·5%)538 (64·0%)..
Planned64 (22·9%)189 (22·6%)..46 (18·3%)203 (24·1%)..
Unplanned from theatre16 (5·7%)25 (3·0%)..10 (4·0%)31 (3·7%)..
Unplanned from ward23 (8·2%)38 (4·6%)..17 (6·8%)43 (5·1%)..
Missing19 (6·8%)13 (1·6%)..1 (0·4%)26 (3·1%)..
Reoperation....0·0015....0·487
Reoperated53 (18·9%)101 (12·1%)..39 (15·5%)115 (13·7%)..
Not reoperated209 (74·6%)717 (85·9%)..207 (82·5%)702 (83·5%)..
Missing18 (6·4%)17 (2·0%)..5 (2·0%)24 (2·9%)..
Length of stay
Median (IQR), days13 (5–28)16 (7–28)0·01210 (3–27)17 (8–29)<0·0001
>30 days64 (22·9%)168 (20·1%)0·35252 (20·7%)176 (20·9%)0·911
Missing2 (0·7%)11 (1·3%)..1 (0·4%)8 (1·0%)..

Urgency data missing for 13 patients and grade of surgery data missing for 36 patients. Percentages shown are based on the denominator of patients in the subgroup.

Postoperative outcomes Urgency data missing for 13 patients and grade of surgery data missing for 36 patients. Percentages shown are based on the denominator of patients in the subgroup. 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients had at least one pulmonary complication (figure 4): 456 (40·4%) had pneumonia, 240 (21·3%) had unexpected ventilation, and 162 (14·4%) had ARDS. Patients who developed pulmonary complications had a higher 30-day mortality than those who did not (38·0% [219 of 577] versus 8·7% [46 of 526], p<0·0001). Pulmonary complications had occurred in 219 (81·7%) of 268 patients who died. Among patients who developed pulmonary complications, 30-day mortality was highest in those who developed ARDS (102 [63·0%] of 162). Pulmonary complications were associated with high 30-day mortality rates across elective patients with a postoperative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (39 [28·3%] of 138), emergency patients with a preoperative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (53 [39·6%] of 134), and emergency patients with a postoperative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (125 [43·1%] of 290; figure 1). Pulmonary complication rates were similar in patients with laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection (493 [50·9%] of 969 vs 32 [47·1%] of 68, p=0·543).
Figure 4

30-day mortality rates associated with components of pulmonary complications

Relationships between the pulmonary complications are in the appendix (p 20). *Mortality data were missing for 15 patients; pulmonary complications data were also missing for 14 of these patients, the other one patient had a pulmonary complication (unexpected ventilation).

30-day mortality rates associated with components of pulmonary complications Relationships between the pulmonary complications are in the appendix (p 20). *Mortality data were missing for 15 patients; pulmonary complications data were also missing for 14 of these patients, the other one patient had a pulmonary complication (unexpected ventilation). In adjusted analyses (figure 5; appendix p 17) pulmonary complications were independently associated with ASA grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·74 [95% CI 1·89–3·99], p<0·0001).
Figure 5

Adjusted model of predictors for pulmonary complications

1029 patients with complete data are included in the adjusted model. Of the patients excluded because of missing data, 19 developed pulmonary complications and 80 patients did not. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Adjusted model of predictors for pulmonary complications 1029 patients with complete data are included in the adjusted model. Of the patients excluded because of missing data, 19 developed pulmonary complications and 80 patients did not. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. At 30 days, pulmonary embolism had occurred in 22 (2·0%) of 1128 patients. The 30-day mortality rate in patients with pulmonary embolism was similar to that in patients who did not have pulmonary embolism (five [22·7%] of 22 vs 263 [23·8%] of 1106, p=0·909). In a sensitivity analysis including only patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, the overall 30-day mortality rate was 23·7% (230 of 969), and pulmonary complications occurred in 493 (50·9%) of 969 patients. In adjusted analyses (appendix p 18), predictors of 30-day mortality were consistent with the main analysis: male sex, age 70 years or older, ASA grades 3–5, cancer surgery, and emergency surgery. The only independent predictor for 30-day pulmonary complications was ASA grades 3–5. In a sensitivity analysis including only patients with preoperatively diagnosed SARS-CoV-2, the overall 30-day mortality rate was 21·1% (62 of 294), and pulmonary complications occurred in 142 (48·3%) of 294 patients. In adjusted analyses (appendix p 19), predictors of 30-day mortality were male sex and ASA grades 3–5. The only independent predictor for 30-day pulmonary complications was ASA grades 3–5.

Discussion

This study identified that postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. This has direct implications for clinical practice around the world. The increased risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection should be balanced against the risks of delaying surgery in individual patients; this study identified men, people aged 70 years or older, those with comorbidities (ASA grades 3–5), those having cancer surgery, and those needing emergency or major surgery as being most vulnerable to adverse outcomes. Thresholds for surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice. Men aged 70 years and over who have emergency or major elective surgery are at particularly high risk of mortality, although minor elective surgery is also associated with higher-than-usual mortality. During SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, consideration should be given for postponing non-critical procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Postoperative outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are substantially worse than pre-pandemic baseline rates of pulmonary complications and mortality. The overall 30-day mortality in this study was 23·8%, and was high across all patient subgroups; all-cause mortality rates were 18·9% in elective patients, 25·6% in emergency patients, 16·3% in patients who had minor surgery, and 26·9% in patients who had major surgery. SARS-CoV-2-infected patients had greater mortality than even the highest-risk subgroups of the UK's NELA. The 2019 NELA report presented 30-day mortality rates of 16·9% in patients with a high preoperative risk of death, 16·8% in patients with an unexpected critical care admission, and 23·4% in frail patients older than 70 years. The mortality rates identified in this study are also higher than those previously reported across international settings; a study across 58 countries, including low-income and middle-income countries, reported a 30-day mortality of 14·9% in the high-risk subgroup who had emergency midline laparotomy. Postoperative mortality rates in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with postoperative pulmonary complications approach those of the sickest patients with community-acquired COVID-19 who are admitted to intensive care. Mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 was mainly in those who had postoperative pulmonary complications, which was about 50% of patients. This rate is far higher than the pre-pandemic baseline; in the POPULAR multicentre, prospective, observational study of 211 hospitals from 28 European countries in 2014–15, the pulmonary complication rate was 8%. In our study, ARDS had the highest mortality rate of the different complications (mortality 63·0%) and occurred much more frequently (20%) than reported in the pre-pandemic African Surgical Outcomes Study (0·05%). In another study of high-risk ASA grade 3 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in seven US centres, 0·2% developed ARDS, with an overall mortality related to postoperative pulmonary complications of 2·3%. Even considering differences in the case-mix, the incidence of and mortality associated with pulmonary complications in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients is disproportionately high. This study has limitations. Protocols for laboratory testing and radiological interpretation were not standardised across participating centres. We describe outcomes in the early phases of the pandemic when routine testing was not available across all sites; setting study inclusion criteria requiring laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 would have excluded some infected patients. Therefore, patients who did not have a laboratory test or CT scan were eligible for inclusion on the basis of clinical diagnosis. Only a minority of patients (6·0%) were included on the basis of a clinical diagnosis and these patients had similar clinical outcomes to patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. The limitations of laboratory testing mean that some infected patients were excluded from the study based on false negative laboratory test results. Future studies need to make recommendations on the role of preoperative testing in patient selection for surgery. The study included patients having any type of surgery and although this has produced generalisable results, it is possible that in large hospitals investigators might have not identified all patients. To mitigate this, the importance of identifying and enrolling all eligible patients was highlighted in training packages for local site investigators and strategies to support comprehensive patient identification were shared regularly with all sites. Final case ascertainment and data completeness were confirmed with local principal investigators, creating as robust a dataset as possible. As far as we are aware, this is the first international study assessing mortality rates after surgery in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the first that reaches across all surgical specialties.24, 25, 26, 27 It was not feasible for all participating hospitals, many of which were experiencing significant stress, to collect data on all patients who had surgery during the pandemic period. Consequently, this study's findings should be interpreted with caution because they have been benchmarked against pulmonary complication and mortality rates from high-quality pre-pandemic studies, rather than against contemporaneous non-SARS-CoV-2-infected comparators. Data were collected in hospitals with ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection outbreaks, which were predominantly in Europe and North America at the time of this study. As the pandemic continues, the evidence this study provides will be relevant to countries where large-scale outbreaks might take place in the future. To facilitate rapid study approvals, this study has focused on key outcomes (mortality and pulmonary complications) that can be collected using routine data. To support decision making by patients and surgeons, future studies should collect longer-term and patient-centred outcomes. When hospitals resume routine surgery, it is likely to be in environments that remain exposed to SARS-CoV-2. In the future, routine preoperative screening for SARS-CoV-2 might be possible with rapid tests that have low false positive rates, but hospital-acquired infection would remain a challenge.12, 28 Strategies are urgently required to minimise in-hospital SARS-CoV-2 transmission and mitigate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients whose surgery cannot be delayed. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com on June 9, 2020

Data sharing

Data sharing requests will be considered by the management group upon written request to the corresponding author. Deidentified participant data or other prespecified data will be available subject to a written proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
  22 in total

1.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Gyorgy Frendl; Juraj Sprung; Daryl J Kor; Bala Subramaniam; Ricardo Martinez Ruiz; Jae-Woo Lee; William G Henderson; Angela Moss; Nitin Mehdiratta; Megan M Colwell; Karsten Bartels; Kerstin Kolodzie; Jadelis Giquel; Marcos Francisco Vidal Melo
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  [Recommendations for general surgery clinical practice in novel coronavirus pneumonia situation].

Authors:  K X Tao; B X Zhang; P Zhang; P Zhu; G B Wang; X P Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-14

5.  The LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications: An observational study.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Luiz Guilherme V da Costa; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Jaume Canet; Göran Hedenstierna; Samir Jaber; Michael Hiesmayr; Markus W Hollmann; Gary H Mills; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Rupert Pearse; Christian Putensen; Werner Schmid; Paolo Severgnini; Hermann Wrigge; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The Prevention of Respiratory Insufficiency after Surgical Management (PRISM) Trial. Report of the protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of CPAP to prevent respiratory complications and improve survival following major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; Tom E Abbott; Richard Haslop; Tahania Ahmad; Brennan C Kahan; Claudia Filipini; Andrew Rhodes; Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Performing abdominal surgery during the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a single-centred, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  M Cai; G Wang; L Zhang; J Gao; Z Xia; P Zhang; Z Wang; K Cai; G Wang; K Tao
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Surgery in COVID-19 patients: operational directives.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Gennaro Perrone; Massimo Chiarugi; Francesco Di Marzo; Luca Ansaloni; Ildo Scandroglio; Pierluigi Marini; Mauro Zago; Paolo De Paolis; Francesco Forfori; Ferdinando Agresta; Alessandro Puzziello; Domenico D'Ugo; Elena Bignami; Valentina Bellini; Pietro Vitali; Flavia Petrini; Barbara Pifferi; Francesco Corradi; Antonio Tarasconi; Vittoria Pattonieri; Elena Bonati; Luigi Tritapepe; Vanni Agnoletti; Davide Corbella; Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  COVID-19 Outbreak and Surgical Practice: Unexpected Fatality in Perioperative Period.

Authors:  Ali Aminian; Saeed Safari; Abdolali Razeghian-Jahromi; Mohammad Ghorbani; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 13.787

View more
  517 in total

1.  Rigour will be important post-COVID-19.

Authors:  Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Inflammatory and coagulative pathophysiology for the management of burn patients with COVID-19: systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  S Al-Benna
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Neophytos Petrides; Safiyah Ismail; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

4.  The safety of anaesthetists and intensivists during the first COVID-19 surge supports extension of use of airborne protection PPE to ward staff.

Authors:  Tim M Cook; Kariem El-Boghdadly; Jules Brown; Anthony E Pickering
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Strategies for the delay of surgery in the management of resectable hepatobiliary malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  S Bennett; K Søreide; S Gholami; P Pessaux; C Teh; E Segelov; H Kennecke; H Prenen; S Myrehaug; D Callegaro; J Hallet
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hytham K S Hamid
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lewis Meecham; Julien Al Shakarchi; Habib P Rahman; Isaac K Nyamekye
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Harsha Shanthanna; Vishal Uppal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Spinal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  James Riley; Rajat Verma
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

10.  Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  James C Glasbey; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Joana F F Simoes; Omar Omar; Elizabeth Li; Mary L Venn; Mohammad K Abou Chaar; Vita Capizzi; Daoud Chaudhry; Anant Desai; Jonathan G Edwards; Jonathan P Evans; Marco Fiore; Jose Flavio Videria; Samuel J Ford; Ian Ganly; Ewen A Griffiths; Rohan R Gujjuri; Angelos G Kolias; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Ana Minaya-Bravo; Siobhan C McKay; Helen M Mohan; Keith J Roberts; Carlos San Miguel-Méndez; Peter Pockney; Richard Shaw; Neil J Smart; Grant D Stewart; Sudha Sundar Mrcog; Raghavan Vidya; Aneel A Bhangu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.