Literature DB >> 32479225

Incorrect Provider Directories Associated With Out-Of-Network Mental Health Care And Outpatient Surprise Bills.

Susan H Busch1, Kelly A Kyanko2.   

Abstract

Mental health services are up to six times more likely than general medical services to be delivered by an out-of-network provider, in part because many psychiatrists do not accept commercial insurance. Provider directories help patients identify in-network providers, although directory information is often not accurate. We conducted a national survey of privately insured patients who received specialty mental health treatment. We found that 44 percent had used a mental health provider directory and that 53 percent of these patients had encountered directory inaccuracies. Those who encountered inaccuracies were more likely (40 percent versus 20 percent) to be treated by an out-of-network provider and four times more likely (16 percent versus 4 percent) to receive a surprise outpatient out-of-network bill (that is, they did not initially know that a provider was out of network). A federal standard for directory accuracy, stronger enforcement of existing laws with insurers liable for directory errors, and additional monitoring by regulators may be needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to care; Health care providers; Health policy; In-network providers; Insurance providers; Mental health; Mental health services; Network adequacy; Out-of-network providers; Psychiatrists; Surprise billing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479225      PMCID: PMC7497897          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  26 in total

1.  Improving provider directory accuracy: can machine-readable directories help?

Authors:  Michael Adelberg; Austin Frakt; Daniel Polsky; Michelle Kitchman Strollo
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Marketplace Plans With Narrow Physician Networks Feature Lower Monthly Premiums Than Plans With Larger Networks.

Authors:  Daniel Polsky; Zuleyha Cidav; Ashley Swanson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Adverse effects of prohibiting narrow provider networks.

Authors:  David H Howard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Secret Shoppers Find Access To Providers And Network Accuracy Lacking For Those In Marketplace And Commercial Plans.

Authors:  Simon F Haeder; David L Weimer; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Networks In ACA Marketplaces Are Narrower For Mental Health Care Than For Primary Care.

Authors:  Jane M Zhu; Yuehan Zhang; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Availability of outpatient care from psychiatrists: a simulated-patient study in three U.S. cities.

Authors:  Monica Malowney; Sarah Keltz; Daniel Fischer; J Wesley Boyd
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Population Of US Practicing Psychiatrists Declined, 2003-13, Which May Help Explain Poor Access To Mental Health Care.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Joanna K Seirup; Harold Alan Pincus; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns Among Psychiatrists Who Do Not Accept Private Insurance.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Chima D Ndumele; Christine F Loveridge; Kelly A Kyanko
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  'Phantom networks' of managed behavioral health providers: an empirical study of their existence and effect on patients in two New Jersey counties.

Authors:  Russell Holstein; David P Paul
Journal:  Hosp Top       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

10.  Differential Reimbursement of Psychiatric Services by Psychiatrists and Other Medical Providers.

Authors:  Tami L Mark; William Olesiuk; Mir M Ali; Laura J Sherman; Ryan Mutter; Judith L Teich
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  7 in total

1.  Variation in network adequacy standards in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Jane M Zhu; Daniel Polsky; Cameron Johnstone; K John McConnell
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.247

2.  Quantifying Balance Billing for Out-of-Network Behavioral Health Care in Employer-Sponsored Insurance.

Authors:  Sarah A Friedman; Haiyong Xu; Francisca Azocar; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Surprise Bills from Outpatient Providers: a National Survey.

Authors:  Kelly A Kyanko; Susan H Busch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Medicaid Managed Care Network Adequacy Standards for Mental Health Care Access: Balancing Flexibility and Accountability.

Authors:  Jane M Zhu; Joshua Breslau; K John McConnell
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-05-14

5.  Does Primary Care Fill the Gap in Access to Specialty Mental Health Care? A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Kelly A Kyanko; Leslie A Curry; Danya E Keene; Ryan Sutherland; Krishna Naik; Susan H Busch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Assessment of Perceptions of Mental Health vs Medical Health Plan Networks Among US Adults With Private Insurance.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Kelly Kyanko
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

7.  Access to Care, Cost of Care, and Satisfaction With Care Among Adults With Private and Public Health Insurance in the US.

Authors:  Charlie M Wray; Meena Khare; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.