Literature DB >> 32479205

Cardiovascular Risk of Isolated Systolic or Diastolic Hypertension in Young Adults.

Hokyou Lee1,2, Yuichiro Yano3, So Mi Jemma Cho4, Jong Heon Park5, Sungha Park2,6, Donald M Lloyd-Jones7, Hyeon Chang Kim1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding health outcomes associated with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), or systolic and diastolic hypertension (SDH) among young adults with stage 1 hypertension, defined using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure (BP) guideline.
METHODS: From a nationwide health screening database, we included 6 424 090 participants, aged 20 to 39 years, who were not taking antihypertensive medication at the baseline examination in 2003 to 2007. Participants were categorized as having normal BP (untreated systolic BP [SBP] <120/diastolic BP [DBP] <80 mm Hg; n=2 665 310); elevated BP (SBP 120-129/DBP <80 mm Hg; n=705 344); stage 1 IDH (SBP <130/DBP 80-89 mm Hg; n=1 271 505); stage 1 ISH (SBP 130-139/DBP <80 mm Hg; n=255 588); stage 1 SDH (SBP 130-139/DBP 80-89 mm Hg; n=711 503); and stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140, DBP ≥90 mm Hg; n=814 840). The primary outcome was composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and CVD-related death.
RESULTS: The median age of the participants was 30 years and 60.9% were male. Over a median follow-up of 13.2 years, 44 070 new CVD events occurred. With normal BP as the reference, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for CVD events were 1.14 (1.09-1.18) for elevated BP, 1.32 (1.28-1.36) for stage 1 IDH, 1.36 (1.29-1.43) for stage 1 ISH, 1.67 (1.61-1.72) for stage 1 SDH, and 2.40 (2.33-2.47) for stage 2 hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults, stage 1 ISH, IDH, and SDH were all associated with higher CVD risks than normal BP. The CVD risks of stage 1 ISH and IDH were similar to each other but lower than the risk of stage 1 SDH. Categorizing young adults with stage 1 hypertension further into stage 1 ISH, IDH, and SDH may improve risk stratification for identifying high-risk individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; guideline; hypertension; young adult

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479205     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  30 in total

Review 1.  Is Isolated Diastolic Hypertension an Important Phenotype?

Authors:  Cesar A Romero; Aldo H Tabares; Marcelo Orias
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  New wrinkles in hypertension management 2022.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.108

3.  Hypertension Subtypes, Mortality Risk, and Differential Effects Between Two Hypertension Guidelines.

Authors:  Hui Mai; Chao Li; Kangyu Chen; Zhenqiang Wu; Xuanyi Liang; Yongjuan Wang; Tao Chen; Fengjian Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 4.  Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Korea.

Authors:  Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Baseline and change in serum uric acid predict the progression from prehypertension to hypertension: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xue Tian; Anxin Wang; Yingting Zuo; Shuohua Chen; Dapeng Mo; Licheng Zhang; Shouling Wu; Yanxia Luo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  BP in Young Adults with CKD and Associations with Cardiovascular Events and Decline in Kidney Function.

Authors:  Alexander J Kula; David K Prince; Joseph T Flynn; Nisha Bansal
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Association between isolated systolic hypertension in young adults and future cardiovascular mortality: three clues prove it.

Authors:  Giacomo Pucci; Rosa Curcio; Marco D'Abbondanza; Gaetano Vaudo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Sex Differences in the Prevalence, Outcomes and Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Paul J Connelly; Gemma Currie; Christian Delles
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Guideline-Driven Management of Hypertension: An Evidence-Based Update.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; Jackson T Wright; Sandra J Taler; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  A cohort study and meta-analysis of isolated diastolic hypertension: searching for a threshold to guide treatment.

Authors:  Alan P Jacobsen; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Kelly Arps; Seamus P Whelton; Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Michael J Blaha; Bruce M Psaty; Roger S Blumenthal; Wendy S Post; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 35.855

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.