Literature DB >> 32479183

Randomized Controlled Trials of Electronic Health Record Interventions: Design, Conduct, and Reporting Considerations.

Mark J Pletcher1, Valerie Flaherman1, Nader Najafi1, Sajan Patel1, Robert J Rushakoff1, Ari Hoffman1, Andrew Robinson1, Russell J Cucina1, Charles E McCulloch1, Ralph Gonzales1, Andrew Auerbach1.   

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems can be configured to deliver novel EHR interventions that influence clinical decision making and to support efficient randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and costs of those interventions. In designing RCTs of EHR interventions, one should carefully consider the unit of randomization (for example, patient, encounter, clinician, or clinical unit), balancing concerns about contamination of an intervention across randomization units within clusters (for example, patients within clinical units) against the superior control of measured and unmeasured confounders that comes with randomizing a larger number of units. One should also consider whether the key computational assessment components of the EHR intervention, such as a predictive algorithm used to target a subgroup for decision support, should occur before randomization (so that only 1 subgroup is randomized) or after randomization (including all subgroups). When these components are applied after randomization, one must consider expected heterogeneity in the effect of the differential decision support across subgroups, which has implications for overall impact potential, analytic approach, and sample size planning. Trials of EHR interventions should be reviewed by an institutional review board, but may not require patient-level informed consent when the interventions being tested can be considered minimal risk or quality improvement, and when clinical decision making is supported, rather than controlled, by an EHR intervention. Data and safety monitoring for RCTs of EHR interventions should be conducted to guide institutional pragmatic decision making about implementation and ensure that continuing randomization remains justified. Reporting should follow the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, with extensions for pragmatic trials and cluster RCTs when applicable, and should include detailed materials to enhance reproducibility.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479183     DOI: 10.7326/M19-0877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  1 in total

1.  Temporal Trends in Clinical Evidence of 5-Year Survival Within Electronic Health Records Among Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer Managed With Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy.

Authors:  Jue Hou; Rachel Zhao; Tianrun Cai; Brett Beaulieu-Jones; Thany Seyok; Kumar Dahal; Qianyu Yuan; Xin Xiong; Clara-Lea Bonzel; Claire Fox; David C Christiani; Thomas Jemielita; Katherine P Liao; Kai-Li Liaw; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.