Literature DB >> 32479180

Reporting and Implementing Interventions Involving Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.

David W Bates1, Andrew Auerbach2, Peter Schulam3, Adam Wright1, Suchi Saria3.   

Abstract

Increasingly, interventions aimed at improving care are likely to use such technologies as machine learning and artificial intelligence. However, health care has been relatively late to adopt them. This article provides clinical examples in which machine learning and artificial intelligence are already in use in health care and appear to deliver benefit. Three key bottlenecks toward increasing the pace of diffusion and adoption are methodological issues in evaluation of artificial intelligence-based interventions, reporting standards to enable assessment of model performance, and issues that need to be addressed for an institution to adopt these interventions. Methodological best practices will include external validation, ideally at a different site; use of proactive learning algorithms to correct for site-specific biases and increase robustness as algorithms are deployed across multiple sites; addressing subgroup performance; and communicating to providers the uncertainty of predictions. Regarding reporting, especially important issues are the extent to which implementing standardized approaches for introducing clinical decision support has been followed, describing the data sources, reporting on data assumptions, and addressing biases. Although most health care organizations in the United States have adopted electronic health records, they may be ill prepared to adopt machine learning and artificial intelligence. Several steps can enable this: preparing data, developing tools to get suggestions to clinicians in useful ways, and getting clinicians engaged in the process. Open challenges and the role of regulation in this area are briefly discussed. Although these techniques have enormous potential to improve care and personalize recommendations for individuals, the hype regarding them is tremendous. Organizations will need to approach this domain carefully with knowledgeable partners to obtain the hoped-for benefits and avoid failures.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479180     DOI: 10.7326/M19-0872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  15 in total

1.  Comparing the predictive value of screening to the use of electronic health record data for detecting future suicidal thoughts and behavior in an urban pediatric emergency department: A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Emily E Haroz; Christopher Kitchen; Paul S Nestadt; Holly C Wilcox; Jordan E DeVylder; Hadi Kharrazi
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2021-09-13

2.  Monitoring Approaches for a Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease Machine Learning Model.

Authors:  Keith E Morse; Conner Brown; Scott Fleming; Irene Todd; Austin Powell; Alton Russell; David Scheinker; Scott M Sutherland; Jonathan Lu; Brendan Watkins; Nigam H Shah; Natalie M Pageler; Jonathan P Palma
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.

Authors:  Isaac S Chua; Michal Gaziel-Yablowitz; Zfania T Korach; Kenneth L Kehl; Nathan A Levitan; Yull E Arriaga; Gretchen P Jackson; David W Bates; Michael Hassett
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review.

Authors:  David W Bates; David Levine; Ania Syrowatka; Masha Kuznetsova; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Angela Rui; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Kyu Rhee
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Artificial intelligence prediction model for overall survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on a 21-gene molecular prognostic score system.

Authors:  Qiliang Peng; Yi Shen; Kai Fu; Zheng Dai; Lu Jin; Dongrong Yang; Jin Zhu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking.

Authors:  Kushan De Silva; Siew Lim; Aya Mousa; Helena Teede; Andrew Forbes; Ryan T Demmer; Daniel Jönsson; Joanne Enticott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Prediction Models of Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: Analyses Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database and a Chinese Cohort.

Authors:  Mo Tang; Lihao Gao; Bin He; Yufei Yang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Identifying Actionability as a Key Factor for the Adoption of 'Intelligent' Systems for Drug Safety: Lessons Learned from a User-Centred Design Approach.

Authors:  George I Gavriilidis; Vlasios K Dimitriadis; Marie-Christine Jaulent; Pantelis Natsiavas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Leveraging artificial intelligence for pandemic preparedness and response: a scoping review to identify key use cases.

Authors:  Ania Syrowatka; Masha Kuznetsova; Ava Alsubai; Adam L Beckman; Paul A Bain; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Jianying Hu; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Kyu Rhee; David W Bates
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Validation of a machine learning algorithm for early severe sepsis prediction: a retrospective study predicting severe sepsis up to 48 h in advance using a diverse dataset from 461 US hospitals.

Authors:  Hoyt Burdick; Eduardo Pino; Denise Gabel-Comeau; Carol Gu; Jonathan Roberts; Sidney Le; Joseph Slote; Nicholas Saber; Emily Pellegrini; Abigail Green-Saxena; Jana Hoffman; Ritankar Das
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.