| Literature DB >> 32478682 |
Ada Gjyrezi1, Fang Xie2, Olga Voznesensky2, Prateek Khanna2, Carla Calagua2, Yang Bai1, Justin Kung3, Jim Wu3, Eva Corey4, Bruce Montgomery5, Sandrine Mace6, Diego A Gianolio7, Glenn J Bubley2, Steven P Balk2, Paraskevi Giannakakou1,8, Rupal S Bhatt2.
Abstract
Despite widespread use of taxanes, mechanisms of action and resistance in vivo remain to be established, and there is no way of predicting who will respond to therapy. This study examined prostate cancer (PCa) xenografts and patient samples to identify in vivo mechanisms of taxane action and resistance. Docetaxel drug-target engagement was assessed by confocal anti-tubulin immunofluorescence to quantify microtubule bundling in interphase cells and aberrant mitoses. Tumor biopsies from metastatic PCa patients obtained 2 to 5 days after their first dose of docetaxel or cabazitaxel were processed to assess microtubule bundling, which correlated with clinical response. Microtubule bundling was evident in PCa xenografts 2 to 3 days after docetaxel treatment but was decreased or lost with acquired resistance. Biopsies after treatment with leuprolide plus docetaxel showed extensive microtubule bundling as did biopsies obtained 2 to 3 days after initiation of docetaxel or cabazitaxel in 2 patients with castration-resistant PCa with clinical responses. In contrast, microtubule bundling in biopsies 2 to 3 days after the first dose of docetaxel was markedly lower in 4 nonresponding patients. These findings indicate that taxanes target both mitotic and interphase cells in vivo and that resistance is through mechanisms that impair drug-target engagement. Moreover, the findings suggest that microtubule bundling after initial taxane treatment may be a predictive biomarker for clinical response.Entities:
Keywords: Oncology; Prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32478682 PMCID: PMC7259995 DOI: 10.1172/JCI132184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Invest ISSN: 0021-9738 Impact factor: 14.808