Literature DB >> 32478390

Nocturnal pollination: an overlooked ecosystem service vulnerable to environmental change.

Callum J Macgregor1,2, Alison S Scott-Brown3.   

Abstract

Existing assessments of the ecosystem service of pollination have been largely restricted to diurnal insects, with a particular focus on generalist foragers such as wild and honey bees. As knowledge of how these plant-pollinator systems function, their relevance to food security and biodiversity, and the fragility of these mutually beneficial interactions increases, attention is diverting to other, less well-studied pollinator groups. One such group are those that forage at night. In this review, we document evidence that nocturnal species are providers of pollination services (including pollination of economically valuable and culturally important crops, as well as wild plants of conservation concern), but highlight how little is known about the scale of such services. We discuss the primary mechanisms involved in night-time communication between plants and insect pollen-vectors, including floral scent, visual cues (and associated specialized visual systems), and thermogenic sensitivity (associated with thermogenic flowers). We highlight that these mechanisms are vulnerable to direct and indirect disruption by a range of anthropogenic drivers of environmental change, including air and soil pollution, artificial light at night, and climate change. Lastly, we highlight a number of directions for future research that will be important if nocturnal pollination services are to be fully understood and ultimately conserved.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial light at night; biodiversity; climate change; plant-insect interactions; pollinators; pollution

Year:  2020        PMID: 32478390     DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20190134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci        ISSN: 2397-8554


  7 in total

1.  Negative effects of light pollution on pollinator visits are outweighed by positive effects on the reproductive success of a bat-pollinated tree.

Authors:  Henry F Dzul-Cauich; Miguel A Munguía-Rosas
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-01-07

2.  Moths complement bumblebee pollination of red clover: a case for day-and-night insect surveillance.

Authors:  Jamie Alison; Jake M Alexander; Nathan Diaz Zeugin; Yoko L Dupont; Evelin Iseli; Hjalte M R Mann; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.812

3.  Continuous video capture, and pollinia tracking, in Platanthera (Orchidaceae) reveal new insect visitors and potential pollinators.

Authors:  Genevieve E van der Voort; Scott R Gilmore; Jamieson C Gorrell; Jasmine K Janes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 4.  Colour vision in nocturnal insects.

Authors:  Eric Warrant; Hema Somanathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Periodically taken photographs reveal the effect of pollinator insects on seed set in lotus flowers.

Authors:  Mihoko Nagai; Yohei Higuchi; Yusei Ishikawa; Wei Guo; Tokihiro Fukatsu; Yuki G Baba; Mayura B Takada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Mediterranean moth diversity is sensitive to increasing temperatures and drought under climate change.

Authors:  Britta Uhl; Mirko Wölfling; Claus Bässler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Pollinator biological traits and ecological interactions mediate the impacts of mosquito-targeting malathion application.

Authors:  Dongmin Kim; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena; Lawrence E Reeves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.