| Literature DB >> 32478276 |
Jundan Zhou1, Min Ge1, Youqi Han1, Jiaxin Ni1, Xun Huang1, Shiyan Han1, Zhibin Peng2, Yudong Li1, Shujun Li1.
Abstract
Fluorescent carbon dots (CDs) have numerous important applications, but enhancing the fluorescence emission and overcoming fluorescence quenching are still big challenges. Here, fluorescence-enhanced carbon dots (named hr-CDs) were prepared from sustainable hydrogenated rosin, using a simple hydrothermal method in a water solvent. The hr-CDs were mainly composed of graphitized carbon cores with surface functional groups. With the increase in the concentration to hr-CDs aqueous solutions, the distance between the carbon cores decreased, which resulted in the formation of J aggregates and the enhanced blue fluorescence emission. Even in the solid state, the hr-CDs show fluorescence emission because the surface functional groups could prevent π-π stacking interactions between the carbon cores. The hr-CDs show excellent resistance to photobleaching under intense ultraviolet light (200 mW/cm2). Vibrations and rotations of graphitized carbon core are restricted by low temperature and high viscosity, leading to increased radiative transition and thus increase in fluorescence intensity. The pH value in the range of 3.99-9.87 and anions have little effect on the fluorescence emission of hr-CDs. The fluorescence emission of the hr-CDs was selectively quenched by Fe3+ and can thus be used to detect Fe3+. The hr-CDs also have good biocompatibility and show the same ability in cell nuclear staining as 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32478276 PMCID: PMC7254789 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Schematic Illustration Showing Preparation of Fluorescence Enhancement Carbon Dots from Hydrogenated Rosin
Figure 1(a) TEM image of hr-CDs (inset: high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM)). (b) UV–vis spectra of solutions of hydrogenated rosin (10 μg/mL) and hr-CDs (10 μg/mL). (c) FTIR spectra of hr-CDs and hydrogenated rosin. (d) 1H NMR spectra of hr-CDs. High-resolution XPS C 1s (e) and O 1s (f) of hr-CDs.
Figure 2(a) Fluorescence spectra of an aqueous solution of hr-CDs (20 μg/mL) at different excitation wavelengths (inset: photograph showing the fluorescence of aqueous solution of hr-CDs under 365 nm ultraviolet irradiation). (b) Fluorescence spectra of the aqueous solutions of hr-CDs with different concentrations (Ex = 310 nm). (c) Fluorescence spectra of solid hr-CDs (inset: photograph showing fluorescence of solid hr-CDs under 365 nm ultraviolet irradiation). (d) Fluorescence intensity of aqueous solution of hr-CDs (10 μg/mL) and DAPI (10 μg/mL) after irradiation with UV lamp (200 mW/cm2) for different periods of time.
Figure 3(a) Changes in the fluorescence intensity of the aqueous solutions of hr-CDs (10 μg/mL) at different pH values. (b) Changes in the fluorescence intensity of aqueous solutions of hr-CDs (20 μg/mL) at different temperatures. (c) Changes in the fluorescence intensity of solutions of hr-CDs (20 μg/mL) in different mixtures of water and glycerol. (d, e) Fluorescence intensity ratio of an aqueous solution of hr-CDs (20 μg/mL) on the addition of different ions (F0 and F are fluorescence intensities without and with ions, respectively). (f) Dependence of F0/F on the concentration of Fe3+ ions over the range 0–340 μM (inset: linear relationship of F0/F versus the concentration of Fe3+ ions over the concentration range 0–60 μM).
Figure 4(a, b) Relative viability of MG-63 and HUVECs incubated with a series of gradient concentrations of hr-CDs for 24 h. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by flow cytometry using (c) MG-63 cells and (d) HUVECs treated with hr-CDs (50 μg/mL) for 72 h.
Figure 5Fluorescence images of (a) MG-63 cells and (b) HUVECs stained by DAPI and incubated with hr-CDs for 10 h. Imaging stained by DAPI in nucleus (I), imaging stained by hr-CDs in nucleus (II), and overlays of the previous two (III).